Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Meningioma surgery in the very old—validating prognostic scoring systems

  • Clinical Article - Brain Tumors
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Several studies acknowledge a higher risk of morbidity and mortality following intracranial meningioma surgery in the elderly, yet there is no consensus with regards to risk factors. Four prognostic scoring systems have been proposed. To evaluate their usefulness, we assess the very old meningioma patients in our neuro-oncological database according to the four methods, and correlate the findings with mortality and morbidity.

Methods

We retrospectively calculated scores according to the Clinical-Radiological Grading System (CRGS), the Sex, Karnofsky Performance Scale, American Society of Anesthesiology Class, Location of Tumor, and Peritumoral Edema grading system (SKALE), the Geriatric Scoring System (GSS) and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) from all patients aged 80–90 years who had primary surgery for intracranial meningiomas 2003–2013 (n = 51), and related our findings to morbidity and mortality.

Results

The mortality rates were 3.9 %, 5.9 % and 15.7 % at 30-days, 3-months and 1-year post-surgery. The rate of complications requiring surgery was 13.7 %, 5.9 % had evacuation of intracerebral hematomas and two patients (3.9 %) had surgery for intracranial infection/osteitis. 15.7 % of the patients were neurologically worsened on discharge. The patients with SKALE scores ≤ 8 had significantly increased mortality rates. The GSS, the CRGS and the CCI were not found to correlate with mortality.

Conclusions

Retrospectively evaluating four proposed scoring systems, we find that the SKALE score reflects the mortality at 1 month and 1 year following primary surgery for intracranial meningiomas in our very old patients. It may represent a helpful adjunct to their preoperative assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arienta C, Caroli M, Crotti F, Villani R (1990) Treatment of intracranial meningiomas in patients over 70 years old. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 107:47–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Awad IA, Kalfas I, Hahn JF, Little JR (1989) Intracranial meningiomas in the aged: surgical outcome in the era of computed tomography. Neurosurgery 24:557–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Black P, Kathiresan S, Chung W (1998) Meningioma surgery in the elderly: a case–control study assessing morbidity and mortality. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 140:1013–1016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boviatsis EJ, Bouras TI, Kouyialis AT, Themistocleous MS, Sakas DE (2007) Impact of age on complications and outcome in meningioma surgery. Surg Neurol 68:407–411, discussion 411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buhl R, Hasan A, Behnke A, Mehdorn HM (2000) Results in the operative treatment of elderly patients with intracranial meningioma. Neurosurg Rev 23:25–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Caroli M, Locatelli M, Prada F, Beretta F, Martinelli-Boneschi F, Campanella R, Arienta C (2005) Surgery for intracranial meningiomas in the elderly: a clinical-radiological grading system as a predictor of outcome. J Neurosurg 102:290–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 40:373–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen-Inbar O, Soustiel JF, Zaaroor M (2010) Meningiomas in the elderly, the surgical benefit and a new scoring system. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152:87–97, discussion 97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen-Inbar O, Sviri GE, Soustiel JF, Zaaroor M (2011) The Geriatric Scoring System (GSS) in meningioma patients–validation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153:1501–1508, discussion 1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cornu P, Chatellier G, Dagreou F, Clemenceau S, Foncin JF, Rivierez M, Philippon J (1990) Intracranial meningiomas in elderly patients. Postoperative morbidity and mortality. Factors predictive of outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 102:98–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Curry WT, McDermott MW, Carter BS, Barker FG 2nd (2005) Craniotomy for meningioma in the United States between 1988 and 2000: decreasing rate of mortality and the effect of provider caseload. J Neurosurg 102:977–986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. D'Andrea G, Roperto R, Caroli E, Crispo F, Ferrante L (2005) Thirty-seven cases of intracranial meningiomas in the ninth decade of life: our experience and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 56:956–961, discussion 956–961

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Djindjian M, Caron JP, Athayde AA, Fevrier MJ (1988) Intracranial meningiomas in the elderly (over 70 years old). A retrospective study of 30 surgical cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 90:121–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gerlach R, Raabe A, Scharrer I, Meixensberger J, Seifert V (2004) Post-operative hematoma after surgery for intracranial meningiomas: causes, avoidable risk factors and clinical outcome. Neurol Res 26:61–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gijtenbeek JM, Hop WC, Braakman R, Avezaat CJ (1993) Surgery for intracranial meningiomas in elderly patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 95:291–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Grossman R, Mukherjee D, Chang DC, Bennett R, Brem H, Olivi A, Quinones-Hinojosa A (2011) Preoperative Charlson comorbidity score predicts postoperative outcomes among older intracranial meningioma patients. World Neurosurg 75:279–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hall WH, Ramachandran R, Narayan S, Jani AB, Vijayakumar S (2004) An electronic application for rapidly calculating Charlson comorbidity score. BMC Cancer 4:94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Karnofsky DA, Buchenal JH (1949) The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: MacLeod CM (ed) Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. Columbia University Press, New York, p 196

    Google Scholar 

  19. Konglund A, Rogne SG, Lund-Johansen M, Scheie D, Helseth E, Meling TR (2013) Outcome following surgery for intracranial meningiomas in the aging. Acta Neurol Scand 127:161–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lieu AS, Howng SL (1998) Surgical treatment of intracranial meningiomas in geriatric patients. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 14:498–503

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mastronardi L, Ferrante L, Qasho R, Ferrari V, Tatarelli R, Fortuna A (1995) Intracranial meningiomas in the 9th decade of life: a retrospective study of 17 surgical cases. Neurosurgery 36:270–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McGrail KM, Ojemann RG (1994) The surgical management of benign intracranial meningiomas and acoustic neuromas in patients 70 years of age and older. Surg Neurol 42:2–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Patil CG, Veeravagu A, Lad SP, Boakye M (2010) Craniotomy for resection of meningioma in the elderly: a multicentre, prospective analysis from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81:502–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pompili A, Cacciani L, Cattani F, Caroli F, Crecco M, Mastrostefano R, Mazzitelli MR, Raus L (1997) Intracranial meningiomas in the elderly. Minerva Med 88:229–236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pompili A, Callovini G, Delfini R, Domenicucci M, Occhipinti E (1998) Is surgery useful in very old patients with intracranial meningioma? Lancet 351:337–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Proust F, Verdure L, Toussaint P, Bellow F, Callonec F, Menard JF, Freger P (1997) Intracranial meningioma in the elderly. Postoperative mortality, morbidity and quality of life in a series of 39 patients over 70 years of age. Neurochirurgie 43:15–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Riffaud L, Mazzon A, Haegelen C, Hamlat A, Morandi X (2007) Surgery for intracranial meningiomas in patients older than 80 years. Presse Med 36:197–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sacko O, Sesay M, Roux FE, Riem T, Grenier B, Liguoro D, Loiseau H (2007) Intracranial meningioma surgery in the ninth decade of life. Neurosurgery 61:950–954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Saklad M (1941) Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 2:281–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schul DB, Wolf S, Krammer MJ, Landscheidt JF, Tomasino A, Lumenta CB (2012) Meningioma surgery in the elderly: outcome and validation of 2 proposed grading score systems. Neurosurgery 70:555–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Statistics-Norway (2012) Deaths 2012. https://www.ssb.no/en/table/05375 Accessed 18 June 2013

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Elisabeth Elgesem for her kind assistance, and for her work with organizing and maintaining our neuro-oncological database. We also thank Are Hugo Pripp at the Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Health Economy, OUS, for his kind advice.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ane Konglund.

Additional information

Comment

The modified SKALE score for evaluating very elderly patients for meningioma surgery may prove of use to surgeons attempting risky procedures at the extremes of age, in order to inform their patients and relatives.

Michael Powell

London, UK

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Konglund, A., Rogne, S.G., Helseth, E. et al. Meningioma surgery in the very old—validating prognostic scoring systems. Acta Neurochir 155, 2263–2271 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1872-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1872-0

Keywords

Navigation