Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term clinical, functional and radiological outcome 21 years after posterior or posterolateral fusion in childhood and adolescence isthmic spondylolisthesis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Long-term radiological studies have shown that a high rate of fusion can be achieved with posterolateral spondylodesis. Radiological findings, however, do not always correlate with patient satisfaction and outcome. No studies have been conducted on the long-term results of functional outcome, including spinal mobility and trunk strength measurements, after operative treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis, as compared with the reference population. Of 129 consecutive patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis operated on with spondylodesis between 1977 and 1987, 107 (83%) participated in the study. Posterior spondylodesis was performed in 29 (27%) patients and posterolateral spondylodesis in 78 (73%) patients. The average follow-up time was 20.9 years (range 15.1–26.2 years). Radiographs obtained preoperatively and at the 2-year and final follow-ups were assessed for quality of the fusion and degenerative changes. Outcome was assessed at the last follow-up by physical examination, spinal mobility and non-dynamometric trunk strength measurements, and calculation of Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores. The fusion rate was 66% after posterior fusion and 83% after posterolateral fusion. Degenerative changes in the lumbar intervertebral discs above the fusion level were noted in 13 (12%) patients. At the final follow-up 14% of patients reported back pain often or very often. The mean ODI score was 7.6 (0–68). Moderate disability was found in 6% of patients and severe disability in 1%; one patient was crippled. No correlation was found between disc degeneration or solidity of the fusion and the ODI score. Non-dynamometric trunk strength measurements corresponded with the reference values. Lumbar flexion, but not extension, was diminished when compared with that of the reference population. The overall long-term clinical outcome is good in patients with spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis operated on with posterior or posterolateral fusion. The clinical and radiological outcomes do not, however, appear to correlate with each other. Lumbar flexion is diminished, but the patients perform, on average, as well as the general population in non-dynamometric trunk strength measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alaranta H, Hurri H, Heliövaara M, Soukka A, Harju R (1994) Flexibility of the spine: normative values of goniometric and tape measurements. Scand J Rehabil Med 26:147–154

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alaranta H, Hurri H, Heliövaara M, Soukka A, Harju R (1994) Non-dynamometric trunk performance tests: reliability and normative data. Scand J Rehabil Med 26:211–215

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burkus JK, Lonstein JE, Winter RE, Denis F (1992) Long-term evaluation of adolescents treated operatively for spondylolisthesis. A comparison of in situ arthrodesis only with in situ arthrodesis and reduction followed by immobilization in a cast. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:693–704

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chou WY, Hsu CJ, Chang WN, Wong CY (2002) Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in elderly patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:39–43

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christensen FB, Hansen ES, Laursen M, Thomsen K, Bunger CE (2002) Long-term functional outcome of pedicle screw instrumentation as a support for posterolateral spinal fusion: randomized clinical study with a 5-year follow-up. Spine 27:1269–1277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL (2001) Radiologic findings and curve progression 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of brace and surgical treatment with matching control group of straight individuals. Spine 26:516–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubousset J (1997) Treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Clin Orthop 337:77–85

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Frennered AK, Danielson BI, Nachemson AL, Nordwall AB (1991) Midterm follow-up of young patients fused in situ for spondylolisthesis. Spine 16:409–416

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gehrchen PM, Dahl B, Katonis P, Blyme P, Tondevold E, Kiaer T (2002) No difference in clinical outcome after posterolateral lumbar fusion between patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis and those with degenerative disc disease using pedicle screw instrumentation: a comparative study of 112 patients with 4 years follow-up. Eur Spine J 11:423–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grzegorzewski A, Kumar SJ (2000) In situ posterolateral spine arthrodesis for grades III, IV, and V spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 20:506–511

    Google Scholar 

  12. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjonen T, Ylikoski M, Schlenzka D, Helenius M, Poussa M (2002) Comparison of long-term functional and radiologic outcomes after Harrington instrumentation and spondylodesis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of 78 patients. Spine 27:176–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jutte PC, Castelein RM (2002) Complications of pedicle screws in lumbar and lumbosacral fusions in 105 consecutive primary operations. Eur Spine J 11:594–598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Laurent LE, Einola S (1961) Spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Acta Orthop Scand 31:45–64

    Google Scholar 

  15. Laurent LE, Österman K (1976) Operative treatment of spondylolisthesis in young patients. Clin Orthop 117:85–91

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lonstein JE (1999) Spondylolisthesis in children: cause, natural history, and management. Spine 24:2640–2648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Loubresse de CG, Bon T, Deburge A, Lassale A, Benoit M (1996) Posterolateral fusion for radicular pain in isthmic spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop 323:194–201

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moller H, Hedlund R (2000) Instrumented and non-instrumented posterolateral fusion in adult spondylolisthesis— a prospective randomised study: part 2. Spine 25:1716–1721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Österman KE, Schlenzka D, Poussa M, Seitsalo S, Virta L (1993) Isthmic spondylolisthesis in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, epidemiology, and natural history with special reference to disc abnormality and mode of treatment. Clin Orthop 297:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saraste H, Broström LÅ, Aparisi T (1984) Prognostic radiographic aspects of spondylolisthesis. Acta Radiol Diagn 25:427–432

    Google Scholar 

  21. Seitsalo S (1990) Operative and conservative treatment of moderate spondylolisthesis in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:908–913

    Google Scholar 

  22. Seitsalo S, Österman K, Hyvärinen H, Tallroth K, Schlenzka D, Poussa M (1991) Progression of spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: a long-term follow-up of 272 patients. Spine 16:417–421

    Google Scholar 

  23. Seitsalo S, Schlenzka D, Poussa M, Österman K (1997) Disc degeneration in young patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis treated operatively or conservatively: a long-term follow-up. Eur Spine J 6:393–397

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thomsen K, Christensen FB, Eiskjaer SP, Hansen ES, Fruensgaard S, Bunger CE (1997) 1997 Volvo award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spine fusion: a prospective, randomised clinical study. Spine 22:2813–2822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Watkins MB (1953) Posterolateral fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 35:1014–1018

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wiltse LL, Winter RB (1983) Terminology and measurements of spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:768–772

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge The Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation, Instrumentarium Scientific Foundation and the Paulon Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommi S. Lamberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lamberg, T.S., Remes, V.M., Helenius, I.J. et al. Long-term clinical, functional and radiological outcome 21 years after posterior or posterolateral fusion in childhood and adolescence isthmic spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 14, 639–644 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0814-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0814-1

Keywords

Navigation