Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple reports have outlined the potential benefits of the laparoscopic approach to colon surgery. Recently, randomized control trials have demonstrated the safety of applying these techniques to colorectal cancer. This study examined the long-term follow-up assessment of patients after laparoscopic colorectal cancer resections and compared them with a large prospective database of open resections. A total of 231 resections were performed for adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum between 1992 and 2004. Of these 231 resections, 93 were rectal (40.3%) and 138 were colonic (59.7%). A total of 8 (3.2%) of the resections were performed as emergencies, and 27 (11.7%) were converted to open surgery. The mean follow-up period was 35.84 months (range, 0–132 months). The disease recurred in 51 of the patients (22.1%) before death, involving 14 (6.1%) local and 37 (16%) distant recurrences. Only two patients had wound recurrences (0.8%), and both patients had widespread peritoneal recurrence at the time of diagnosis. The overall survival rate was 65.3% at 60 months and 60.3% at 120 months. The disease-free survival rate was 58% at 60 months and 56% at 120 months. Laparoscopic techniques can be applied to a wide range of colorectal malignancies without sacrificing oncologic results during a long-term follow-up period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short term outcomes after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91: 1111–1114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett C, Stryker S, Rosario FM, Adams J, Beart R (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1,194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132: 41–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bretangol F, Lelong B, Luarent C, Moutardier V, Rullier A, Monges G, Delpero JR, Rullier E (2005) The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 19: 892–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Feliciotti F, Paganini AM, Guerreri M, Sanctis A, Campagnacci R, Lezoche E (2002) Results of laparoscopic vs open resections for colon cancer in patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Surg Endosc 16: 1158–1161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fleshman J, Wexner SD, Anvari M, La Tulippe JF, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Read TE, Nogueras J, Weiss EG (1999) Laparoscopic vs. open abdominoperineal resection for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42: 930–939

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffman GC, Baker JW, Fitchett CW, Vansant JH (1994) Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy: initial experience. Ann Surg 219: 732–743

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong D, Lewis M, Tabet J, Anvari M (2002) Prospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open resection for benign colorectal disease. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 238–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hong D, Tabet H, Anvari M (2001) Laparoscopic vs open resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 10–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ichihara T, Takada M, Fukumoto S, Kuroda T (2004) Lymphadenectomy along the middle colic artery in laparoscopic resection of transverse colon. Hepatogastroenterology 51: 454–456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacob BP, Salky B (2005) Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: an 11-year retrospective review with 5 year survival rates. Surg Endosc 19: 643–649

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jessup JM, McGinnis LS, Steele GD, Menck HR, Winchester DP (1996) The National Cancer Data Base report on colon cancer. Cancer 78: 918–926

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson PM, Malatjalian D, Porter GA (2002) Adequacy of nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study. J Gastrointest Surg 6: 883–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kapiteilijn E, Putter H, van de Velde CJH (2002) Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in the Netherlands. Br J Surg 89: 1142–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique J, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359: 2224–2229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leroy J, Jamali L, Forbes L, Smith M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2004) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery. Surg Endosc 18: 281–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lujan HJ, Plasencia G, Jacobs M, Viamonte M, Hartmann RF (2002) Long-term survival after laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: complete five-year follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 45: 491–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martling AL, Holm T, Rutqvist LE, Moral BJ, Heald RJ, Cedermark B (2000) Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the county of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project. Lancet 356: 93–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Morino M, Parini U, Giraudo G, Salval M, Brachet Contul R, Garrone C (2003) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg 237: 335–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Murty M, Enker WE, Martz J (2000) Current status of total mesorectal excision and autonomic nerve preservation in rectal cancer. Semin Surg Oncol 19: 321–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand H, Fleshman J, Anvari M, Stryker J, Beart RW, Hellinger M, Flanagan R, Peters W, Ota D (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350: 2050–2059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Phillips EH, Franklin M, Carroll B, Fallas MJ, Ramos R, Rosenthal D (1992) Laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 216: 703–707

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schiedeck THK, Schwandner O, Baca I, Baehrlehner E, Konradt J, Kockerling F, Kuthe A, Buerk C, Herold A, Bruch HP (2000) Laparoscopic surgery for the cure of colorectal cancer: results of a German five-year study. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Gregoire R, Burpee S, Poulin E (2003) Could laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery become the standard of care? A review and experience with 750 procedures. Can J Surg 46: 432–440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC (2001) Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44: 217–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wexner SD, Reissman P, Pfeifer J, Bernstein M, Geron N (1996) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis of 140 cases. Surg Endosc 10: 133–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the assistance of Catherine Gill Pottruff in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Anvari.

Additional information

Presented at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) meeting, Hollywood FL, USA, 12–16 April 2005

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sample, C.B., Watson, M., Okrainec, A. et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20, 30–34 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0253-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0253-z

Keywords

Navigation