Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Eating Assessment Tool-10 Predicts Aspiration in Adults with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adults with COPD frequently present with dysphagia, which often leads to clinical complications and hospital admissions. This study investigates the ability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) to predict aspiration during objective dysphagia evaluation in adults with stable COPD. Thirty adults (20 male, 10 female; mean age = 69.07 ± 16.82) with stable COPD attended an outpatient dysphagia clinic for a fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in an acute teaching hospital (January 2015–November 2016). During evaluations, individuals completed an EAT-10 rating scale followed immediately by a standardised FEES exam. Aspiration status during FEES was rated using the penetration–aspiration scale by clinicians blinded to EAT-10 scores. Data were retrospectively analysed. Significant differences in mean EAT-10 scores were found between aspirators (16.3; SEM = 2.165) and non-aspirators (7.3; SEM = 1.009) (p = 0.000). The EAT-10 predicted aspiration with a high level of accuracy (AUC = 0.88). An EAT-10 cut-off value of >9 presented a sensitivity of 91.67, specificity of 77.78 with positive and negative likelihood ratios of 4.12 and 0.11, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 73.30 and 93.30, respectively. Diagnostic odds ratio was 38.50 (p < 0.01, CI 3.75–395.42). EAT-10 is a quick, easy to administer tool, which can accurately predict the presence of aspiration in adults with COPD. The scale can also very accurately exclude the absence of aspiration, helping clinicians to determine the need for onward referral for a comprehensive dysphagia evaluation. This may ultimately reduce clinical complications and hospital admissions resulting from dysphagia in this clinical population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vestbo J. COPD: definition and phenotypes. Clin Chest Med. 2014;35(1):1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis. Management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (GOLD). 2008. Accessed 26 Jan 2009.

  3. Mannino DM. COPD: epidemiology, prevalence, morbidity and mortality, and disease heterogeneity. Chest. 2002;121:121S–6S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pifarre R, Falguera M, Vicente-de-Vera C, Nogues C. Characteristics of community-acquired pneumonia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2007. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2007.05.011.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cvejic L, Harding R, Churchward T, Turton A, Finlay P, Massey D, Bardin PG, Guy P. Laryngeal penetration and aspiration in individuals with stable COPD. Respirology. 2011;16:269–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mokhlesi B, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, Stangl CA, Corbridge TC. Oropharyngeal deglutition in stable COPD. Chest. 2002;121(2):361–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shaker R, Li Q, Ren J, Townsend WF, Dodds WJ, Martin BJ, Kern MK, Rynders A. Coordination of deglutition and phases of respiration: effect of aging, tachypnea, bolus volume, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Physiol. 1992;263(5.1):750–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gross DR, Atwood CW, Ross SB, Olszewski JW, Eichhorn KA. The coordination of breathing and swallowing in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179:559–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin-Harris B. Clinical implications of respiratory—swallowing interactions. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;16(3):194–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Good-Fratturelli MD, Curlee RF, Holle JL. Prevalence and nature of dysphagia in VA patients with COPD referred for videofluoroscopic swallow examination. J Commun Disord. 2000;33(2):93–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zheng Z, Wu Z, Liu N, Chen P, Hou P, Wang X, Fu Y, Liang W, Chen R. Silent aspiration in patients with exacerbation of COPD. Eur Respir J. 2016;48(2):570–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stein M, Williams AJ, Grossman F, Weinberg AS, Zuckerbraun L. Cricopharyngeal dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest. 1990;97(2):347–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clayton NA, Carnaby-Mann GD, Peters MJ, Ing AJ. The effect of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on laryngopharyngeal sensitivity. Ear Nose Throat J. 2012;91(9):370–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Coelho CA. Preliminary findings on the nature of dysphagia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Dysphagia. 1987;2(1):28–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Takada K, Matsumoto S, Kojima E, Iwata S, Okachi S, Ninomiya K, Morioka H, Tanaka K, Enomoto Y. Prospective evaluation of the relationship between acute exacerbations of COPD and gastroesophageal reflux disease diagnosed by questionnaire. Respir Med. 2011;105(10):1531–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chatila WM, Thomashow BM, Minai OA, Criner GJ, Make BJ. Comorbidities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5(4):549–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kobayashi S, Kubo H, Yanai M. Impairment of the swallowing reflex in exacerbations of COPD. Thorax. 2007;62(11):1017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Schermer TRJ, Saris CGJ, Van Den Bosch WJHM, Chavannes NH, Van Schayck CP, Dekhuijzen PNR, Van Weel C. Exacerbations and associated healthcare cost in patients with COPD in general practice. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2016. doi:10.4081/monaldi.2006.558.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, Leonard RJ. Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008;117(12):919–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheney DM, Siddiqui MT, Litts JK, Kuhn MA, Belafsky PC. The ability of the 10-item eating assessment tool (EAT-10) to predict aspiration risk in persons with dysphagia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124(5):351–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Plowman EK, Tabor LC, Robison R, Gaziano J, Dion C, Watts SA, Vu T, Gooch C. Discriminant ability of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 to detect aspiration in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28(1):85–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Arrese LC, Carrau R, Plowman EK. Relationship between the Eating Assessment Tool-10 and objective clinical ratings of swallowing function in individuals with head and neck cancer. Dysphagia. 2016;32:83–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rofes L, Arreola V, Mukherjee R, Clave P. Sensitivity and specificity of the Eating Assessment Tool and the volume-viscosity swallow test for clinical evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;26(9):1256–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wakabayashi H, Matsushima M. Dysphagia assessed by the 10-item Eating Assessment Tool is associated with nutritional status and activities of daily living in elderly individuals requiring long-term care. J Nutr Health Aging. 2016;20(1):22–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration–aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11(2):93–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Colodny N. Interjudge and intrajudge reliabilities in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (Fees®) using the penetration–aspiration scale: a replication study. Dysphagia. 2002;17(4):308–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kelly AM, Drinnan MJ, Leslie P. Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare? Laryngoscope. 2007;117(10):1723–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pisegna JM, Langmore SE. Parameters of instrumental swallowing evaluations: describing a diagnostic dilemma. Dysphagia. 2016;31(3):462–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. MedCalc, Version 16.4.3 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium). 2016. https://www.medcalc.org.

  30. Dollaghan CA. The handbook for evidence-based practice in communication disorders. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes Publishing Company; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Almirall J, Rofes L, Serra-Prat M, Icart R, Palomera E, Arreola V, Clave P. Oropharyngeal dysphagia is a risk factor for community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly. Eur Respir J. 2013;41:923–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ickenstein GW, Riecker A, Höhlig C, Müller R, Becker U, Reichmann H, Prosiegel M. Pneumonia and in-hospital mortality in the context of neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia (NOD) in stroke and a new NOD step-wise concept. J Neurol. 2010;257:1492–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hinchey JA, Shephard T, Furie K, Smith D, Wang D, Tonn S. Formal dysphagia screening protocols prevent pneumonia. Stroke. 2005;36:1972–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rofes L, Arreola V, Romea M, Palomera E, Almirall J, Cabré M, Serra-Prat M, Clavé P. Pathophysiology of oropharyngeal dysphagia in frail elderly. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010;22:851.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA, Bossuyt PM. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Speyer R, Cordier R, Kertscher B, Heijnen BJ. Psychometric properties of questionnaires on functional health status in oropharyngeal dysphagia: a systematic literature review. BioMed Res Int. 2014. doi:10.1155/2014/458678.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Cordier R, Joosten A, Clavé P, Schindler A, Bülow M, Demir N, Serel Arslan S, Speyer R. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) using rasch analysis. Dysphagia. 2016;32:250–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland

    Julie Regan & Vânia De Aguiar

  2. Speech and Language Therapy Department, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin 24, Ireland

    Julie Regan & Susan Lawson

Authors
  1. Julie Regan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan Lawson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vânia De Aguiar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Regan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Regan, J., Lawson, S. & De Aguiar, V. The Eating Assessment Tool-10 Predicts Aspiration in Adults with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Dysphagia 32, 714–720 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9822-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9822-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation