Skip to main content
Log in

Soil microbial diversity and soil functioning affect competition among grasses in experimental microcosms

  • Plant Animal Interactions
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A gradient of microbial diversity in soil was established by inoculating pasteurized soil with microbial populations of different complexity, which were obtained by a combination of soil fumigation and filtering techniques. Four different soil diversity treatments were planted with six different grass species either in monoculture or in polyculture to test how changes of general microbial functions, such as catabolic diversity and nutrient recycling efficiency would affect the performance of the plant communities. Relatively harsh soil treatments were necessary to elicit visible effects on major soil processes such as decomposition and nitrogen cycling due to the high redundancy and resilience of soil microbial communities. The strongest effects of soil diversity manipulations on plant growth occurred in polycultures where interspecific competition between plants was high. In polycultures, soil diversity reduction led to a gradual, linear decline in biomass production of one subordinate grass species (Bromus hordeaceus), which was compensated by increased growth of two intermediate competitors (Aegilops geniculata, B. madritensis). This negative covariance in growth of competing grass species smoothed the effects of soil diversity manipulations at the plant community level. As a result, total shoot biomass production remained constant. Apparently the effects of soil diversity manipulations were buffered because functional redundancy at both, the microbial and the plant community level complemented each other. The results further suggests that small trade-offs in plant fitness due to general functional shifts at the microbial level can be significant for the outcome of competition in plant communities and thus diversity at much larger scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alphei J, Scheu S (1993) Effects of biocidal treatments on biological and nutritional properties of a mull-structured woodland soil. Geoderma 56:435–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JPE, Domsch KH (1978) A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 10:215–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck T, Joergensen RG, Kandeler E, Makeschin F, Nuss E, Oberholzer HR, Scheu S (1997) An inter-laboratory comparison of ten different ways of measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1023–1032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonkowski M, Scheu S (2004) Biotic interactions in the rhizosphere: effects on plant growth and herbivore development. In: Weisser W, Sieman E (eds) Insects and ecosystem functioning. Ecological studies,vol 173. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 71–91

  • Bonkowski M, Griffiths BS, Scrimgeour C (2000) Substrate heterogeneity and microfauna in soil organic ‘hotspots’ as determinants of nitrogen capture and growth of rye-grass. Appl Soil Ecol 14:37–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MA, Jones TH, Bardgett RD, Black H, Boag B, Bonkowski M, Cook R, Eggers T, Gange AC, Grayston SJ, Kandeler E, McCaig AE, Newington JE, Prosser J, Setälä H, Staddon PL, Tordoff GM, Tscherko D, Lawton JH (2002) Impacts of soil faunal community composition on model grassland ecosystems. Science 298:615–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT, Naylor RL, Vitousek PM, Reynolds HL, Hooper DU, Lavorel S, Sala OE, Hobbie SE, Mack MC, Diaz S (2000) Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Degens B P (1998) Decreases in microbial functional diversity do not result in corresponding changes in decomposition under different moisture conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1989–2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines SD, Rice WR (1990) Analysis of biological data when there are ordered expectations. Am Nat 135:310–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland JL, Mills AL (1991) Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon-source utilization. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:2351–2359

    Google Scholar 

  • Giller PS (1996) The diversity of soil communities the ‘poor man’s tropical rain forest’. Biodivers Conserv 5:135–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths BS, Ritz K, Bardgett RD, Cook R, Christensen S, Ekelund F, Sørensen SJ, Bååth E, Bloem J, de Ruiter PC, Dolfing J, Nicolardot B (2000) Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship. Oikos 90:279–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths BS, Bonkowski M, Roy J, Ritz K (2001) Functional stability substrate utilisation and biological indicators of soils following environmental impacts. Appl Soil Ecol 16:49–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth DL (1991) The fungal dimension of diversity: magnitude significance and conservation. Mycol Res 95:641–655

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden MGA, Klironomos JN, Ursic M, Moutoglis P, Streitwolf-Engel R, Boller T, Wiemken A, Sanders IR (1998) Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant diversity ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396:69–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heil M, Baldwin IT (2002) Fitness costs of induced resistance: emerging experimental support for a slippery concept. Trends Plant Sci 7:61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston MA (1997) Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110:449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klironomos JN (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417:67–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M (2001) Microbial diversity producer–decomposer interactions and ecosystem processes: a theoretical model. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:303–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, Bengtsson J, Grime JP, Hector A, Hooper DU, Huston MA, Raffaelli D, Schmid B, Tilman D, Wardle DA (2001) Ecology—biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294:804–808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P (2002) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning—synthesis and perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfadyen A (1970) Simple methods for measuring and maintaining the proportion of carbon dioxide in air for use in ecological studies on soil respiration. Soil Biol Biochem 2:9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrady-Steed J, Harris PM, Morin PJ (1997) Diversity regulates ecosystem predictability. Nature 390:162–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S, Li S (1997) Diversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390:507–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S, Hahn DR, Schuurman G (2000) Producer–decomposer co-dependency influences biodiversity effects. Nature 403:762–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Navas ML, Sonie L, Roy J (1997) The influence of elevated CO2 on species phenology growth and reproduction in a Mediterranean old-field community. Global Change Biol 3:523–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Page FC (1976) An illustrated key to freshwater and soil amoebae. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul EA, Clark FE (1989) Soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S (1992) Automated measurement of the respiratory response of soil microcompartments—active microbial biomass in earthworm faeces. Soil Biol Biochem 24:1113–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid B, Hector A, Huston M, Inchausti P, Nijs I, Leadley P, Tilman D (2002) The design and analysis of biodiversity experiments. In: Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning—Synthesis and perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 61–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh JS, Raghubanshi AS, Singh RS, Srivastava SC (1989) Microbial biomass acts as a source of plant nutrients in dry tropical forest and savanna. Nature 338:499–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan A, Meyer AH, Schmid B (2000) Plant diversity positively affects soil bacterial diversity in experimental grassland ecosystems. J Ecol 88:988–998

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1990) Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients: the elements of a predictive theory of competition. In: Grace JB, Tilman D (eds) Perspectives on plant competition. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 117–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Downing DA (1994) Diversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367:363–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torsvik V, Goksøyr J, Daae FL (1990) High diversity in DNA of soil bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:782–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyota K, Ritz K, Kuninaga S, Kimura M (1999) Impact of fumigation with metam sodium upon soil microbial community structure in two Japanese soils. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 45:207–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA (1999) Is ‘sampling effect’ a problem for experiments investigating biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships? Oikos 87:403–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Klironomos JN, Setälä H, van der Putten WH, Wall DH (2004) Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science 304:1629–1633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watkinson AR (1998) The role of the soil community in plant population dynamics. Trends Ecol Evol 13:171–172

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Stefan Scheu for helpful discussions during the planning of the experiment and for final comments on the manuscript and Bernhard Schmid for his invaluable statistical advice. Christian Collin, Laurette Sonie and Karola Bonkowski gave technical support. This work was funded by a ‘poste rouge’ from C.N.R.S to MB. This paper is a contribution to the GDR DIV-ECO 1936, the ACI program ‘Interaction entre biodiversité et fonctionnement dans les ecosystems’ and the BIOLOG program ’Microbial terrestrial biodiversity’ (project 7) by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Bonkowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonkowski, M., Roy, J. Soil microbial diversity and soil functioning affect competition among grasses in experimental microcosms. Oecologia 143, 232–240 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1790-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1790-1

Keywords

Navigation