Abstract
Local modification of the soil environment by individual plants may affect the performance and composition of associated plant species. The aromatic plant Thymus vulgaris has the potential to modify the soil through leaching of water-soluble compounds from leaves and litter decomposition. In southern France, six different thyme chemotypes can be distinguished based on the dominant monoterpene in the essential oil, which is either phenolic or non-phenolic in structure. We examine how soils from within and away from thyme patches in sites dominated by either phenolic or non-phenolic chemotypes affect germination, growth and reproduction of the associated grass species Bromus erectus. To do so, we collected seeds of B. erectus from three phenolic and three non-phenolic sites. Seeds and seedlings were grown on soils from these sites in a reciprocal transplant type experiment in the glasshouse. Brome of non-phenolic origin performed significantly better on its home soil than on soil from a different non-phenolic or a phenolic site. This response to local chemotypes was only observed on soil collected directly underneath thyme plants and not on soil in the same site (<5 m away) but where no thyme plants were present. This is preliminary evidence that brome plants show an adaptive response to soil modifications mediated by the local thyme chemotypes. Reproductive effort was consistently higher in brome of phenolic origin than in brome of non-phenolic origin (on both thyme- and grass-soil), indicating that life-history variation may be related to environmental factors which also contribute to the spatial differentiation of thyme chemotypes. Moreover, we found that brome growing on thyme-soil in general was heavier than when growing on grass-soil, regardless of the origin of the brome plants. This is concordant with thyme-soil containing higher amounts of organic matter and nitrogen than grass-soil. Our results indicate that patterns of genetic differentiation and local adaptation may modify competitive interactions and possible facilitation effects in natural communities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aronson J, Kigel J, Shmida A (1993) Reproductive allocation strategies in desert and Mediterranean populations of annual plants grown with and without water stress. Oecologia 93:336–342
Bertness MD, Callaway R (1994) Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol Evol 9:191–193
Boettcher SE, Kalisz PJ (1990) Single tree influence on soil properties in the mountains of eastern Kentucky. Ecology 71:1365–1372
Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD (2004) Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol Evol (in press)
Callaway RM (1995) Positive interactions among plants. Bot Rev 61:306–349
Callaway RM, Nadkarni NM, Mahall BE (1991) Facilitation and interference of Querqus Douglasii on understory productivity in Central California. Ecology 72:1484–1499
Callaway RM, Kikvidze Z, Kikodze D (2000) Facilitation by unpalatable weeds may conserve plant diversity in overgrazed meadows in the Caucasus Mountains. Oikos 89:275–282
Charley JL, West NE (1975) Plant-induced soil chemical patterns in some shrub-dominated semi-desert ecosystems of Utah. J Ecol 63:945–963
Franks SJ (2003) Facilitation in multiple life-history stages: evidence for nucleated succession in coastal dunes. Plant Ecol 168:1–11
Friedman J, Orshan G (1975) The distribution, emergence and survival of seedlings of Artemisia herba alba Asso in the Negev desert of Israel in relation to distance from the adult plants. J Ecol 63:627–632
Gouyon PH, Vernet P, Guillerm JL, Valdeyron G (1986) Polymorphisms and environment: the adaptive value of the oil polymorphisms in Thymus vulgaris L. Heredity 57:59–66
Granger R, Passet J (1973) Thymus vulgaris L. spontané de France: races chimiques et chemotaxonomie. Phytochemistry 12:1683–1691
Grime JP, Cornelissen JHC, Thompson K, Hodgson JG (1996) Evidence of a causal connection between anti-herbivore defence and the decomposition rate of leaves. Oikos 77:489–494
Heisey RM, Delwiche CC (1985) Allelopathic effects of Trichostema lanceolatum (Labiateae) in the California annual grassland. J Ecol 73:729–742
Herrera CM (2002) Topsoil properties and seedling recruitment in Lavandula latifolia: stage dependence and spatial decoupling of influential parameters. Oikos 97:260–270
Loissaint P (1973) Soil-vegetation relationships in Mediterranean ecosytems of southern France. In: di Castri F, Mooney HA (eds) Mediterranean Type Ecosystems. Origin and structure. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 199–210
Madritch MD, Hunter MD (2004) Phenotypic diversity and litter chemistry affect nutrient dynamics during litter decomposition in a two species mix. Oikos 105:125–131
Maestre FT, Bautista S, Cortina J (2003) Positive, negative, and net effects in grass-shrub interactions in Mediterranean semiarid grasslands. Ecology 2003:3186–3197
Martinez ML (2003) Facilitation of seedling establishment by an endemic shrub in tropical coastal sand dunes. Plant Ecol 168:333–345
McPherson JK, Muller CH (1969) Allelopathic effects of Adenostoma fasiculatum “chamise” in the California chaparral. Ecol Monogr 39:177–198
Mulder CPH, Uliassi DD, Doak DF (2001) Physical stress and diversity-productivity relationships: the role of positive interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6704–6708
Preston CA, Baldwin IT (1999) Positive and negative signals regulate germination in the post-fire annual Nicotiana attenuate. Ecology 80:481–494
Pugnaire FI, Armas C, Valladares F (2004) Soil as a mediator in plant-plant interactions in a semiarid community. J Veg Sci 15:85–92
Rice EL (1979) Allelopathy—an update. Bot Rev 45:15–109
Rousset O, Lepart J (2000) Positive and negative interactions at different life stages of a colonizing species (Quercus humilis). J Ecol 88:401–412
SAS (1999) SAS/STAT Users guide, version eight. SAS, Cary
Schenk HJ, Mahall BE (2002) Positive and negative plant interactions contribute to a north-south-patterned association between two desert shrub species. Oecologia 132:402–410
Tarayre M, Thompson JD, Escarré J, Linhart YB (1995) Intra-specific variation in the inhibitory effects of Thymus vulgaris (Labiatae) monoterpenes on seed germination. Oecologia 101:110–118
Tewksbury JJ, Lloyd JD (2001) Positive interactions under nurse-plants: spatial scale, stress gradients and benefactor size. Oecologia 127:425–434
Thompson JD (2002) Population structure and the spatial dynamics of genetic polymorphisms in thyme. In: Letchamo W, Saez F, Stahl-Biskup E (eds) Medicinal and aromatic plants—industrial profiles: the genus Thymus. Harwood Academic, Amsterdam, pp 44–74
Thompson JD, Chalchat JC, Michet A, Linhart YB, Ehlers B (2003) Qualitative and quantitative variation in monoterpene co-occurrence and composition in the essential oil of Thymus vulgaris chemotypes. J Chem Ecol 29:859–880
Vernet P, Guillerm JL, Gouyon PH (1977a) Le polymorphisme chimique de Thymus vulgaris L. (Labiée) I. Repartition des formes chimiques en relation avec certains facteurs écologiques. Oecol Plant 12:159–179
Vernet P, Guillerm JL, Gouyon PH (1977b) Le polymorphisme chimique de Thymus vulgaris L. (Labiée) II. Carte à l’echelle 5000 des formes chimiques dans la région de Saint-Martin-de-Londres (Herault-France). Oecol Plant 12:181–194
Vernet P, Gouyon PH, Valdeyron G (1986) Genetic control of the oil content in Thymus vulgaris L.: a case of polymorphism in a biosynthetic chain. Genetica 69:227–231
Vokou D, Margaris NS (1984) Effects of volatile oils from aromatic shrubs on soil microorganisms. Soil Biol Biochem 16:509–513
Vokou D, Margaris NS (1988) Decomposition of terpenes by soil microorganisms. Pedobiologia 31:413–419
Williamson GB (1990) Allelopathy, Koch’s postulates, and the Neck riddle. In: Grace JB, Tilman T (eds) Perspectives on plant competition. Academic, London, pp 143–162
Zinke PJ (1962) The pattern of influence of individual forest trees on soil properties. Ecology 43:130–133
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Maistre, C. Colin, A. Dos Santos and D. Degeuldre for their help with data collection in the field and greenhouse, M. Debussche and A. Dos Santos for identification of species emerging from the seed bank, T. Bataillon and S. Lavergne for statistical advice and Y. B. Linhart, S. Debain, K. Keefover-Ring and anonymous reviewers for helpful discussion and comments on preliminary versions of the manuscript. The study was financed by the European Science Foundation (Program LINKECOL), the Danish National Science Research Council (B.K.E.) and the CNRS (J.D.T.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ehlers, B.K., Thompson, J. Do co-occurring plant species adapt to one another? The response of Bromus erectus to the presence of different Thymus vulgaris chemotypes. Oecologia 141, 511–518 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1663-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1663-7