Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Treatment deviating from guidelines does not influence status epilepticus prognosis

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Status epilepticus (SE) prognosis is related to nonmodifiable factors (age, etiology), but the exact role of drug treatment is unclear. This study was undertaken to address the prognostic role of treatment adherence to guidelines (TAG). We prospectively studied over 26 months a cohort of adults with incident SE (excluding postanoxic). TAG was assessed in terms of drug doses (±30 % of recommendations) and medication sequence; its prognostic impact on mortality and return to baseline conditions was adjusted for etiology, SE severity [Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS)], and comorbidities. Of 225 patients, 26 (12 %) died and 82 (36 %) were discharged with a new handicap; TAG was observed in 142 (63 %). On univariate analysis, age, etiology, SE severity, and comorbidities were significantly related to outcome, while TAG was associated with neither outcome nor likelihood of SE control. Logistic regression for mortality identified etiology [odds ratio (OR) 18.8, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 4.3–82.8] and SE severity (STESS ≥3; OR 1.7, 95 % CI 1.2–2.4) as independent predictors, and for lack of return to baseline, again etiology (OR 7.4, 95 % CI 3.9–14.0) and STESS ≥3 (OR 1.7, 95 % CI 1.4–2.2). Similar results were found for the subgroup of 116 patients with generalized-convulsive SE. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses confirmed that TAG did not improve outcome prediction. This study of a large SE cohort suggests that treatment adherence to recommendations using current medications seems to play a negligible prognostic role (class III), confirming the importance of the biological background. Awaiting further treatment trials, it appears mandatory to apply resources towards identification of new therapeutic approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Commission on Epidemiology and Prognosis, International League Against Epilepsy (1993) Guidelines for epidemiologic studies on epilepsy. Epilepsia 34:592-596

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alvarez V, Januel JM, Burnand B, Rossetti AO (2012) Role of comorbidities in outcome prediction after status epilepticus. Epilepsia 53:e89–e92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aranda A, Foucart G, Ducasse JL, Grolleau S, McGonigal A, Valton L (2010) Generalized-convulsive status epilepticus management in adults: a cohort study with evaluation of professional practice. Epilepsia 51:2159–2167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Coeytaux A, Jallon P, Galobardes B, Morabia A (2000) Incidence of status epilepticus in French-speaking Switzerland: (EPISTAR). Neurology 55:693–697

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. DeLorenzo RJ, Hauser WA, Towne AR, Boggs JG, Pellock JM, Penberthy L, Garnett L, Fortner CA, Ko D (1996) A prospective, population-based epidemiologic study of status epilepticus in Richmond, Virginia. Neurology 46:1029–1035

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Drislane FW, Blum AS, Lopez MR, Gautam S, Schomer DL (2009) Duration of refractory status epilepticus and outcome: loss of prognostic utility after several hours. Epilepsia 50:1566–1571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Govoni V, Fallica E, Monetti VC, Guerzoni F, Faggioli R, Casetta I, Granieri E (2007) Incidence of Status Epilepticus in Southern Europe: a Population Study in the Health District of Ferrara, Italy. Eur Neurol 59:120–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holtkamp M (2011) Treatment strategies for refractory status epilepticus. Curr Opin Crit Care 17:94–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Holtkamp M, Othman J, Buchheim K, Meierkord H (2005) Predictors and prognosis of refractory status epilepticus treated in a neurological intensive care unit. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:534–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Knake S, Rosenow F, Vescovi M, Oertel WH, Mueller HH, Wirbatz A, Katsarou N, Hamer HM (2001) Incidence of status epilepticus in adults in Germany: a prospective, population-based study. Epilepsia 42:714–718

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Koubeissi M, Alshekhlee A (2007) In-hospital mortality of generalized-convulsive status epilepticus: a large US sample. Neurology 69:886–893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leppert D, Stoeckli HR, Fuhr P (2005) Directives pour le traitement de l’état de mal épileptique. Schweizerische Aerztezeitung 86. www.saez.ch/status_epilepticus_f.pdf

  14. Logroscino G, Hesdorffer DC, Cascino G, Annegers JF, Hauser WA (1997) Short-term mortality after a first episode of status epilepticus. Epilepsia 38:1344–1349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lowenstein DH, Alldredge BK (1998) Status epilepticus. N Engl J Med 338:970–976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lowenstein DH, Bleck T, Macdonald RL (1999) It’s time to revise the definition of status epilepticus. Epilepsia 40:120–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Marchi N, Granata T, Freri E, Ciusani E, Ragona F, Puvenna V, Teng Q, Alexopolous A, Janigro D (2011) Efficacy of anti-inflammatory therapy in a model of acute seizures and in a population of pediatric drug resistant epileptics. PLoS ONE 6:e18200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Meierkord H, Boon P, Engelsen B, Gocke K, Shorvon S, Tinuper P, Holtkamp M (2010) EFNS guideline on the management of status epilepticus in adults. Eur J Neurol 17:348–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Minicucci F, Muscas G, Perucca E, Capovilla G, Vigevano F, Tinuper P (2006) Treatment of status epilepticus in adults: guidelines of the Italian League against Epilepsy. Epilepsia 47(Suppl 5):9–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Muayqil T, Rowe BH, Ahmed SN (2007) Treatment adherence and outcomes in the management of convulsive status epilepticus in the emergency room. Epileptic Disord 9:43–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Neligan A, Shorvon SD (2011) Prognostic factors, morbidity and mortality in tonic-clonic status epilepticus: a review. Epilepsy Res 93:1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Novy J, Logroscino G, Rossetti AO (2010) Refractory status epilepticus: a prospective observational study. Epilepsia 51:251–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Outin H, Blanc T, Vinatier I (2009) Emergency and intensive care unit management of status epilepticus in adult patients and children (new-born excluded). Societe de reanimation de langue francaise experts recommendations. Rev Neurol (Paris) 165:297–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rabinstein AA (2010) Management of status epilepticus in adults. Neurol Clin 28:853–862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ravizza T, Balosso S, Vezzani A (2011) Inflammation and prevention of epileptogenesis. Neurosci Lett 497:223–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rossetti AO, Hurwitz S, Logroscino G, Bromfield EB (2006) Prognosis of status epilepticus: role of aetiology, age, and consciousness impairment at presentation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77:611–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rossetti AO, Logroscino G, Bromfield EB (2005) Refractory status epilepticus: effect of treatment aggressiveness on prognosis. Arch Neurol 62:1698–1702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rossetti, AO, Logroscino G, Milligan TA, Michaelides C, Ruffieux C, Bromfield EB (2008) Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS): a tool to orient early treatment strategy. J Neurol 255:1561–1566

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rossetti AO, Lowenstein DH (2011) Management of refractory status epilepticus in adults: still more questions than answers. Lancet Neurol 10:922–930

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rossetti AO, Novy J, Ruffieux C, Olivier P, Foletti GB, Hayoz D, Burnand B, Logroscino G (2009) Management and prognosis of status epilepticus according to hospital setting: a prospective study. Swiss Med Wkly 139:719–723

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Scholtes FB, Renier WO, Meinardi H (1994) Generalized-convulsive status epilepticus: causes, therapy, and outcome in 346 patients. Epilepsia 35:1104–1112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shneker BF, Fountain NB (2003) Assessment of acute morbidity and mortality in non-convulsive status epilepticus. Neurology 61:1066–1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shorvon S (2011) The treatment of status epilepticus. Curr Opin Neurol 24:165–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Silbergleit R, Durkalski V, Lowenstein D, Conwit R, Pancioli A, Palesch Y, Barsan W (2012) Intramuscular versus intravenous therapy for prehospital status epilepticus. N Engl J Med 366:591–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Towne AR, Pellock JM, Ko D, DeLorenzo RJ (1994) Determinants of mortality in status epilepticus. Epilepsia 35:27–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. van Rijckevorsel K, Boon P, Hauman H, Legros B, Ossemann M, Sadzot B, Schmedding E, van Zandijcke M (2006) Standards of care for non-convulsive status epilepticus: Belgian consensus recommendations. Acta Neurol Belg 106:117–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vignatelli L, Rinaldi R, Baldin E, Tinuper P, Michelucci R, Galeotti M, de Carolis P, D’Alessandro R (2008) Impact of treatment on the short-term prognosis of status epilepticus in two population-based cohorts. J Neurol 255:197–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu YW, Shek DW, Garcia PA, Zhao S, Johnston SC (2002) Incidence and mortality of generalized-convulsive status epilepticus in California. Neurology 58:1070–1076

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

A.O.R. received research grants from Pfizer, UCB, GSK, and Sandoz. All other authors do not have anything to disclose.

Ethical standard

This study has been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and has therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea O. Rossetti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rossetti, A.O., Alvarez, V., Januel, JM. et al. Treatment deviating from guidelines does not influence status epilepticus prognosis. J Neurol 260, 421–428 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6644-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-012-6644-x

Keywords

Navigation