Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tinnitus modifications after cochlear implantation

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tinnitus can be defined as a phantom sensation in the absence of an external sound. In our study, we evaluated the effect of cochlear implant on tinnitus evolution. Among adult, postlingually deaf patients who underwent cochlear implantation at our clinic, we selected 20 subjects with pre-implantation tinnitus (group A) and 10 subjects without pre-implantation tinnitus (group B). Pre- and post-surgery tinnitus was assessed through two questionnaires: the first one dealing with tinnitus characteristics and psychosocial impact, and the second one represented by THI, an internationally validated score of evaluation of the effects of tinnitus on patient’s emotions and activities of daily living. None of the patients belonging to group B developed tinnitus after surgery. As for group A, 40% of patients declared suppression of tinnitus, 30% attenuation of tinnitus after surgery, 25% reported tinnitus was unchanged and 5% reported worsening of tinnitus. In the nine patients with bilateral tinnitus (45%), after implantation tinnitus disappeared from both sides in four patients and attenuated bilaterally in four patients. A comparison between pre- and post-implantation THI scores showed decreased score in 65% of cases, unchanged score in 30% and increased score in 5%. The beneficial effect of cochlear implant on tinnitus, reported by a majority of patients, could be due to acoustic masking, to direct electrical stimulation of the acoustic nerve, and above all to a possible cochlear implantation dependent reorganization of the central auditory pathways and associative cerebral areas. In the light of these results, the authors propose (1) to include tinnitus in the selection criteria of which ear to implant; (2) to consider implantation eligibility for patients with bilateral severe hearing loss associated with severe tinnitus; and (3) to inform patients about the small risk of post-operative tinnitus worsening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eggermont J (2004) The neuroscience of tinnitus. Trends neurosci 27(11):676–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ottaviani A, Bergomi A et al. (1983) Eziopatogenesi. In: Motta G (Ed) Gli Acufeni. Atti LXX Congresso Nazionale della Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale. Bologna, maggio, pp 25–28

  3. Quaranta N, Wagstaff S, Baguley D (2004) Tinnitus and cochlear implantation. Int J Audiol 43:245–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Newman C, Jacobson G (1996) Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:143–148

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Soulière J, Kileny P, Zwolan T, Kemink J (1992) Tinnitus suppression following cochlear implantation: a multifactorial investigation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118:1291–1297

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aschendorff A, Pabst G, Kletzner T, Laszig R (1998) Tinnitus in cochlear implant users: the Freiburg experience. Int Tinnitus J 4:162–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Demajumdar R, Stoddart R (1999) Tinnitus, cochlear implants and how they affect patients. J Laryngol Otol Suppl 24:24–26

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Battmer R, Heermann R (1989) Suppression of tinnitus by electric stimulation in cochlear implant paients. HNO 37:148–152

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mo B, Harris S, Lindbaek M (2002) Tinnitus in cochlear implant patients: a comparison with other hearing-impaired patients. Int J Audiol 41:527–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rubenstein M, Tyler R (2003) Electrical suppression of tinnitus with high-rate pulse trains. Otol Neurotol 22:200–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fukuda Y, Albernaz P (1998) The AllHear cochlear implant and tinnitus. Int Tinnitus J 4(2):159–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yasuhiro, Osaki (2005) Neural mechanism of residual inhibition of tinnitus in cochlear implant users. Neuroreport 16(15):1625–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Giraud A, Price C (2001) Functional plasticity of language-related brain areas after cochlear implantation. Brain 124:1307–1316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jastreboff P (1990) Phantom auditory perception-tinnitus: mechanisms of generation and perception. Neurosci Res 8(4):221–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cianfrone G, Passi S (2004) Acufeni e iperacusia. Il trattamento riabilitativo. Audiol Newsl 8(1):3

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Walter Di Nardo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Nardo, W., Cantore, I., Cianfrone, F. et al. Tinnitus modifications after cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264, 1145–1149 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0352-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0352-7

Keywords

Navigation