Abstract
Introduction
This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the association between elevated serum estradiol (E 2) levels on the human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration day and in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy and birth outcomes in the long GnRH-agonist protocol.
Methods
This study analyzed the data of 3393 infertile women who underwent initial fresh IVF. The patients were categorized into high and low E 2 groups based on their serum E 2 levels on the hCG day. Pregnancy and birth outcomes were compared.
Results
The implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate were all significantly higher in the high E 2 group than in the low E 2 group (p < 0.05). The good-quality embryo rate and abortion rate did not significantly differ between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the mode of delivery, gestational age, birth weight, and fetal gender between the two groups. Furthermore, there were no differences in the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and fetal malformation between the two groups in 860 single live births. Subgroup analysis of singleton pregnancies in the high E 2 (E 2 ≥ 3757 pg/mL) group revealed a significant increase in abortion rate in the age group of ≥37 years.
Conclusions
Elevated serum E 2 levels associated with controlled ovarian stimulation did not increase the risks of preterm birth, low birth weight, and fetal malformation. High E 2 on the hCG day had no detrimental effect on the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Polat M, Bozdag G, Yarali H (2014) Best protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted reproductive technologies: fact or opinion? Semin Reprod Med 32(4):262–271. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1375178
Pittaway DE, Wentz AC (1983) Evaluation of the exponential rise of serum estradiol concentrations in human menopausal gonadotropin-induced cycles. Fertil Steril 40(6):763–767
Kalra SK, Ratcliffe SJ, Coutifaris C, Molinaro T, Barnhart KT (2011) Ovarian stimulation and low birth weight in newborns conceived through in vitro fertilization. Obstet Gynecol 118(4):863–871. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822be65f
Chenette PE, Sauer MV, Paulson RJ (1990) Very high serum estradiol levels are not detrimental to clinical outcome of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 54(5):858–863
Gelety TJ, Buyalos RP (1995) The influence of supraphysiologic estradiol levels on human nidation. J Assist Reprod Genet 12(7):406–412
Simon C, Cano F, Valbuena D, Remohi J, Pellicer A (1995) Clinical evidence for a detrimental effect on uterine receptivity of high serum oestradiol concentrations in high and normal responder patients. Hum Reprod 10(9):2432–2437
Ng EH (2000) What is the threshold value for serum estradiol levels associated with adverse IVF outcomes? Fertil Steril 73(5):1071–1072
Wu Z, Li R, Ma Y, Deng B, Zhang X, Meng Y et al (2012) Effect of HCG-day serum progesterone and oestradiol concentrations on pregnancy outcomes in GnRH agonist cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 24(5):511–520. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.003
Kyrou D, Popovic-Todorovic B, Fatemi HM, Bourgain C, Haentjens P, Van Landuyt L et al (2009) Does the estradiol level on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration have an impact on pregnancy rates in patients treated with rec-FSH/GnRH antagonist? Hum Reprod 24(11):2902–2909. doi:10.1093/humrep/dep290
Wu CH, Kuo TC, Wu HH, Yeh GP, Tsai HD (2007) High serum estradiol levels are not detrimental to in vitro fertilization outcome. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 46(1):54–59. doi:10.1016/S1028-4559(08)60108-4
Hu XL, Feng C, Lin XH, Zhong ZX, Zhu YM, Lv PP et al (2014) High maternal serum estradiol environment in the first trimester is associated with the increased risk of small-for-gestational-age birth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(6):2217–2224. doi:10.1210/jc.2013-3362
Sunkara SK, La Marca A, Seed PT, Khalaf Y (2015) Increased risk of preterm birth and low birthweight with very high number of oocytes following IVF: an analysis of 65 868 singleton live birth outcomes. Hum Reprod 30(6):1473–1480. doi:10.1093/humrep/dev076
Pereira N, Reichman DE, Goldschlag DE, Lekovich JP, Rosenwaks Z (2015) Impact of elevated peak serum estradiol levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on the birth weight of term singletons from fresh IVF-ET cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 32(4):527–532. doi:10.1007/s10815-015-0434-1
Zhang N, Hao CF, Zhuang LL, Liu XY, Gu HF, Liu S et al (2013) Prediction of IVF/ICSI outcome based on the follicular output rate. Reprod Biomed Online. 27(2):147–153. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.04.012
Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K et al (2009) International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril 92(5):1520–1524. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009
Imudia AN, Goldman RH, Awonuga AO, Wright DL, Styer AK, Toth TL (2014) The impact of supraphysiologic serum estradiol levels on peri-implantation embryo development and early pregnancy outcome following in vitro fertilization cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 31(1):65–71. doi:10.1007/s10815-013-0117-8
Sharara FI, McClamrock HD (1999) High estradiol levels and high oocyte yield are not detrimental to in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 72(3):401–405
Yu Ng EH, Yeung WS, Yee Lan Lau E, So WW, Ho PC (2000) High serum oestradiol concentrations in fresh IVF cycles do not impair implantation and pregnancy rates in subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod 15(2):250–255
Taskin EA, Atabekoglu CS, Musali N, Oztuna D, Sonmezer M (2014) Association of serum estradiol levels on the day of hCG administration with pregnancy rates and embryo scores in fresh ICSI/ET cycles down regulated with either GnRH agonists or GnRH antagonists. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289(2):399–405. doi:10.1007/s00404-013-2984-8
Zavy MT, Craig LB, Wild RA, Kahn SN, O’Leary D, Hansen KR (2014) In high responding patients undergoing an initial IVF cycle, elevated estradiol on the day of hCG has no effect on live birth rate. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 12:119. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-12-119
Zhao Z, Li Y, Chen H, Huang L, Zhao F, Yu Q et al (2014) Xylaria nigripes mitigates spatial memory impairment induced by rapid eye movement sleep deprivation. Int J Clin Exp Med 7(2):356–362
Ulug U, Tosun S, Jozwiak EA, Mesut A, Sismanoglu A, Bahceci M (2006) Subclinical pregnancy losses among women undergoing in vitro fertilization with ICSI. J Assist Reprod Genet 23(6):261–267. doi:10.1007/s10815-006-9038-0
Chen CH, Zhang X, Barnes R, Confino E, Milad M, Puscheck E et al (2003) Relationship between peak serum estradiol levels and treatment outcome in in vitro fertilization cycles after embryo transfer on day 3 or day 5. Fertil Steril 80(1):75–79
Imudia AN, Awonuga AO, Doyle JO, Kaimal AJ, Wright DL, Toth TL et al (2012) Peak serum estradiol level during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is associated with increased risk of small for gestational age and preeclampsia in singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 97(6):1374–1379. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.028
Joo BS, Park SH, An BM, Kim KS, Moon SE, Moon HS (2010) Serum estradiol levels during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation influence the pregnancy outcome of in vitro fertilization in a concentration-dependent manner. Fertil Steril 93(2):442–446. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.066
Xing W, Lin H, Li Y, Yang D, Wang W, Zhang Q (2015) Is the GnRH antagonist protocol effective at preventing OHSS for potentially high responders undergoing IVF/ICSI? PLoS One 10(10):e0140286. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140286
Ma WG, Song H, Das SK, Paria BC, Dey SK (2003) Estrogen is a critical determinant that specifies the duration of the window of uterine receptivity for implantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(5):2963–2968. doi:10.1073/pnas.0530162100
Chen QJ, Sun XX, Li L, Gao XH, Wu Y, Gemzell-Danielsson K et al (2007) Effects of ovarian high response on implantation and pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (with GnRH agonist and rFSH). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86(7):849–854. doi:10.1080/00016340701415152
Valbuena D, Jasper M, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Simon C (1999) Ovarian stimulation and endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod 14(Suppl 2):107–111
Levi AJ, Drews MR, Bergh PA, Miller BT, Scott RT Jr (2001) Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation does not adversely affect endometrial receptivity in in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 76(4):670–674
Cai Q, Wan F, Huang K, Zhang H (2013) Does the number of oocytes retrieved influence pregnancy after fresh embryo transfer? PLoS One 8(2):e56189. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056189
Kalra SK, Ratcliffe SJ, Dokras A (2013) Is the fertile window extended in women with polycystic ovary syndrome? Utilizing the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry to assess the impact of reproductive aging on live-birth rate. Fertil Steril 100(1):208–213. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.055
Baird DT, Collins J, Egozcue J, Evers LH, Gianaroli L, Leridon H et al (2005) Fertility and ageing. Hum Reprod Update 11(3):261–276. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmi006
van Rooij IA, Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW, Habbema JD, te Velde ER (2003) Women older than 40 years of age and those with elevated follicle-stimulating hormone levels differ in poor response rate and embryo quality in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 79(3):482–488
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declared there were no competing interests involved.
Research involving human participants
The study is approved the ethical committee of Yuhuangding Hospital of Yantai, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University.
Informed consent
Written informed consents were obtained from all the study participants.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, M., Hao, C., Bao, H. et al. Effect of elevated estradiol levels on the hCG administration day on IVF pregnancy and birth outcomes in the long GnRH-agonist protocol: analysis of 3393 cycles. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295, 407–414 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4242-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-016-4242-3