Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A randomized controlled trial comparing parenteral normal saline with and without 5 % dextrose on the course of labor in nulliparous women

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to compare intravenous normal saline with and without 5 % dextrose on the course of labor in nulliparous women in active phase of spontaneous labor.

Study design

In a randomized controlled trial, term, nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy in active labor were randomized into one of two groups receiving either normal saline or normal saline alternating with 5 % dextrose at rate of 175 ml/h. The primary outcome was total length of labor from onset of study fluid in vaginally delivered women. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were also analyzed.

Results

Of 250 women enrolled, in vaginally delivered subjects, there was significant difference in the duration of labor (p = 0.0) and prolonged labor (p = 0.01), with favorable results for women in 5 % dextrose alternating with normal saline. No statistically significant differences were observed in the cesarean section rates between the groups. The cord pH was significantly higher in neonates born to women in 5 % dextrose alternating with normal saline infusion as compared to normal saline alone (p = 0.01), however, no neonate in the study had acidemia.

Conclusion

Administration of a 5 % dextrose solution alternating with normal saline is a better parenteral fluid for significantly decreasing duration of labor in term vaginally delivered nulliparous women in spontaneous active labor as compared to normal saline alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Handa VL, Laros RK (1993) Active-phase arrest in labor: predictors of caesarean delivery in a nulliparous population. Obstet Gynecol 81:758–763

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Garite TJ, Weeks J, Peters-Phair K, Pattillo C, Brewster WR (2000) A randomized control trial on the effect of increased intra-venous hydration on the course of labor in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1544–1548

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eslamian L, Maroosi V, Pakneeyat Y (2006) Increased intravenous fluid intake and the course of labor in nulliparous women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 93:102–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shrivastava VK, Garite TJ, Jenkis SM et al (2009) A randomized double blinded control trial comparing parenteral normal saline with and without dextrose on the course of labor in nulliparas. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200:379e1–379e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Steingrimsdottir T, Ronquist G, Ulmsten U, Waldenstrom A (1995) Different energy metabolite pattern between uterine smooth muscle and striated rectus muscle in term pregnant women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 62:241–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Steingrimsdottir T, Ronquist G, Ulstenn U (1993) Energy economy in pregnant human uterus at term: studies on arteriovenous differences in metabolites of carbohydrate, fat and nucleotides. Eur J Obstet Gynecol and Reprod Biol 51:209–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maughan RJ, Noakes TD (1991) Fluid replacement and exercise stress. A brief review of studies on fluid replacement and some guidelines for the athlete. Sports Med 12:16–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Friedman EA (1978) Labor clinical evaluation and management, 2nd edn. Appleton Century Crofts, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Scheepers HCJ, Thans MCJ, de Jong PA et al (2002) A double blind, randomized, placebo controlled study on the influence of carbohydrate solution intake during labor. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1091:78–81

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tarnow-Mordi WO, Shaw JC, Liu D, Gardner DA, Flynn FV (1981) Iatrogenic hyponatremia of the newborn due to maternal fluid overload: a prospective study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 283:639–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Johansson S, Lindow S, Kapadia H, Norman M (2002) Perinatal water intoxication due to excessive oral intake during labor. Acta Paedtr 91:811–814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. West CR, Harding JE (2004) Maternal water intoxication as a cause of neonatal seizures. J Paediatr Child Health 40:709–710

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jamal A, Choobak N, Tabassomi F (2007) Intrapartum maternal glucose infusion and fetal acid base status. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 97:187–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DR RPGMC Kangra at Tanda, Set No. 112, Vivekanand Hostel, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India

    Chanderdeep Sharma

  2. PGIMER, Chandigarh, India

    Jasvinder Kalra, Rashmi Bagga & Praveen Kumar

Authors
  1. Chanderdeep Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jasvinder Kalra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rashmi Bagga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Praveen Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chanderdeep Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, C., Kalra, J., Bagga, R. et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing parenteral normal saline with and without 5 % dextrose on the course of labor in nulliparous women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286, 1425–1430 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2485-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2485-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation