Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Course of pelvic lift during total hip arthroplasty

  • Hip Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The position of the cup makes a major contribution to the success of total hip arthroplasty (THA). In conventional implantation of the prosthesis without navigation, the surgeon relies on the spatial position of the pelvis. However, iatrogenic manipulation of the pelvis during different surgical steps constantly changes the position of the pelvis during the operation. The position of the pelvis is substantial for the correct placement of the cup. The objective of this study was to investigate and visualize the course of this pelvic lift and correlate it to certain surgical steps.

Materials and methods

Pelvic lift was measured in 67 patients during implantation of a THA. This was done by measuring acceleration using the SensorLog app on a smartphone. It was placed on the patient’s contralateral anterior superior iliac spine and recorded the movement of the pelvis throughout the whole surgical procedure. The position of the pelvis was allocated to each of eight relevant surgical steps during the operation. These surgical steps were normed over the time axis and transferred to a diagram.

Results

We found an average pelvic lift displacement of up to 14.9° upon placement in the figure-of-four position. This lift is particularly critical when exposing the acetabulum, as the true cup position can be unconsciously influenced. Average values of between 5.6° and 6.9° were found here.

Conclusions

When implanting a THA in supine position, the pelvis is not fixed on the operating table. Rather, the side to be operated on is lifted to a greater or lesser degree, depending on the surgical step to be performed. The retractor traction immediately before cup implantation should be minimized. Nevertheless, it should be taken into account that anteversion of the cup implant in relation to the table plane is systematically higher than in relation to the pelvic entry plane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harrison CL, Thomson AI, Cutts S, Rowe PJ, Riches PE (2014) Research synthesis of recommended acetabular cup orientations for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29:377–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nishii T, Sugano N, Miki H, Koyama T, Takao M, Yoshikawa H (2004) Influence of component positions on dislocation: computed tomographic evaluations in a consecutive series of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:162–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kummer FJ, Shah S, Iyer S, DiCesare PE (1999) The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation. J Arthroplasty 14:509–513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Patil S, Bergula A, Chen PC, Colwell CW, D’Lima DD (2003) Polyethylene wear and acetabular component orientation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85-A Suppl 4:56–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Walter WL, O’toole GC, Walter WK, Ellis A, Zicat BA (2007) Squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic hips: the importance of acetabular component orientation. J Arthroplasty 22:496–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Woo RY, Morrey BF (1982) Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 64:1295–1306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tai SM, Munir S, Walter WL, Pearce SJ, Walter WK, Zicat BA (2015) Squeaking in large diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30:282–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grammatopoulos G, Pandit HG, da Assunção R, Taylor A, McLardy-Smith P, De Smet KA, Murray DW, Gill HS (2014) Pelvic position and movement during hip replacement. Bone Jt J 96-B:876–883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Asayama I, Akiyoshi Y, Naito M, Ezoe M (2004) Intraoperative pelvic motion in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:992–997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanazawa M, Nakashima Y, Ohishi M, Hamai S, Motomura G, Yamamoto T, Fukushi J-I, Ushijima T, Hara D, Iwamoto Y (2016) Pelvic tilt and movement during total hip arthroplasty in the lateral decubitus position. Mod Rheumatol 26:435–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, Zurakowski D, Rubash HE, Freiberg AA, Malchau H (2010) The John Charnley award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:319–329

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Jt Surg Am 60:217–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Elkins JM, Callaghan JJ, Brown TD (2014) The 2014 Frank Stinchfield award: the “landing zone” for wear and stability in total hip arthroplasty is smaller than we thought: a computational analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:441–452

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Danoff JR, Bobman JT, Cunn G, Murtaugh T, Gorroochurn P, Geller JA, Macaulay W (2016) Redefining the acetabular component safe zone for posterior approach total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31:506–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Renkawitz T, Weber M, Springorum H-R, Sendtner E, Woerner M, Ulm K, Weber T, Grifka J (2015) Impingement-free range of movement, acetabular component cover and early clinical results comparing ‘femur-first’ navigation and “conventional” minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial. Bone Jt J 97:890–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Woerner M, Sendtner E, Springorum R, Craiovan B, Worlicek M, Renkawitz T, Grifka J, Weber M (2016) Visual intraoperative estimation of cup and stem position is not reliable in minimally invasive hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 87:225–230

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakashima Y, Hirata M, Akiyama M, Itokawa T, Yamamoto T, Motomura G, Ohishi M, Hamai S, Iwamoto Y (2014) Combined anteversion technique reduced the dislocation in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38:27–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weber M, Weber T, Woerner M, Craiovan B, Worlicek M, Winkler S, Grifka J, Renkawitz T (2015) The impact of standard combined anteversion definitions on gait and clinical outcome within one year after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 39:2323–2333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ezoe M, Naito M, Asayama I, Ishiko T, Fujisawa M (2005) Pelvic motion during total hip arthroplasty with translateral and posterolateral approaches. J Orthop Sci 10:167–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bauer R, Kerschbaumer F, Poisel S, Oberthaler W (1979) The transgluteal approach to the hip joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 95:47–49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Hardi Hauk for taking and providing the photographs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Brodt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brodt, S., Nowack, D., Krakow, L. et al. Course of pelvic lift during total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137, 129–133 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2601-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2601-y

Keywords

Navigation