Abstract
Objectives
Squamous carcinoma of the penis is rare but psychologically devastating and potentially fatal. Radiotherapy offers a penile-conserving treatment option without jeopardizing cure. We have used primary penile brachytherapy as the treatment of choice for T1, T2 and selected T3 patients since 1989 and present updated results for 67 patients.
Methods
Mean age was 60 years (range 22–93). Stage was T1 in 56%, T2: 33%, T3: 8%, and Tx: 3%. Grade was moderate or poorly differentiated in 48%. In Toronto after-loading pulse dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy (n = 41) was used for all treatments while Ottawa used manually loaded Iridium192 (n = 26). Two or three parallel planes of needles (median 6) were inserted using pre-drilled lucite templates for guidance and fixation; 60 Gy was delivered over 4–5 days.
Results
Median follow-up is 4 years (range 0.2–16.2). At 10 years, actuarial overall survival is 59%, cause specific survival 83.6%. Nine men died of penile cancer and eight of other causes with no evidence of recurrence. Penectomy was required for eight local failures and two necroses, for an actuarial penile preservation rate at 5 years of 88% and 10 years of 67%. The soft tissue necrosis rate is 12% and the urethral stenosis rate 9%. Six of 11 regional failures were salvaged by lymph node dissection ± external radiation. The other five all had concurrent distant failure and died of disease.
Conclusions
Brachytherapy is an effective treatment for T1, T2 and selected T3 SCC of the penis. Close follow-up is mandatory as local failures and many regional failures can be salvaged by surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Opjordsmoen S, Fossa SD (1994) Quality of life in patients treated for penile cancer. A follow-up study. Br J Urol 74:652–657
Ornellas AA, Seixas AL, Marota A et al (1994) Surgical treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: retrospective analysis of 350 cases. J Urol 151:1244–1249
Harden SV, Tan LT (2001) Treatment of localized carcinoma of the penis: a survey of current practice in the UK. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 13:284–287 quiz 288
Crook J, Grimard L, Tsihlias J et al (2002) Interstitial brachytherapy for penile cancer: an alternative to amputation. J Urol 167:506–511
Sobin LH (2002) WC: Penis (ICD-0 C60) in TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th edn. Wiley, New York
Pierquin B, Chassagne D, Wilson F (1987) Modern brachytherapy. Masoom Pub, New York
Armour EP, White JR, Armin A et al (1997) Pulsed low dose rate brachytherapy in a rat model: dependence of late rectal injury on radiation pulse size. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38:825–834
Chen CZ, Huang Y, Hall EJ et al (1997) Pulsed brachytherapy as a substitute for continuous low dose rate: an in vitro study with human carcinoma cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37:137–143
Fowler JF, Van Limbergen EF (1997) Biological effect of pulsed dose rate brachytherapy with stepping sources if short half-times of repair are present in tissues. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37:877–883
Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457
Pepe MS, Mori M (1993) Kaplan-Meier, marginal or conditional probability curves in summarizing competing risks failure time data? Stat Med 12:737–751
Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:163–170
McLean M, Akl AM, Warde P et al (1993) The results of primary radiation therapy in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 25:623–628
Soria JC, Fizazi K, Piron D et al (1997) Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: multivariate analysis of prognostic factors and natural history in monocentric study with a conservative policy. Ann Oncol 8:1089–1098
Rozan R, Albuisson E, Giraud B et al (1995) Interstitial brachytherapy for penile carcinoma: a multicentric survey (259 patients). Radiother Oncol 36:83–93
Zouhair A, Coucke PA, Jeanneret W et al (2001) Radiation therapy alone or combined surgery and radiation therapy in squamous-cell carcinoma of the penis? Eur J Cancer 37:198–203
Sarin R, Norman AR, Steel GG et al (1997) Treatment results and prognostic factors in 101 men treated for squamous carcinoma of the penis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38:713–722
Sagerman RH, Yu WS, Chung CT et al (1984) External-beam irradiation of carcinoma of the penis The treatment of early cancer of the penis with megavoltage x-rays. Radiology 152:183–185
Vujovic Olga GJB (2001) Davis Stewart: carcinoma of the penis: a treatment technique with external beam radiation. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can 34:495–497
Mazeron JJ, Langlois D, Lobo PA et al (1984) Interstitial radiation therapy for carcinoma of the penis using iridium 192 wires: the Henri Mondor experience (1970–1979). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 10:1891–1895
Kiltie AE, Elwell C, Close HJ et al (2000) Iridium-192 implantation for node-negative carcinoma of the penis: the Cookridge Hospital experience. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 12:25–31
Delannes M, Malavaud B, Douchez J et al (1992) Iridium-192 interstitial therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 24:479–483
Solsona E, Algaba F, Horenblas S, et al. (2008) European Association of Urology Guidelines. In: Office EG (ed) Guidelines on Penile Cancer. Arnhem, Netherlands, Drukkeril Gelderland bv pp Chapter 6:1–28
Chaudhary AJ, Ghosh S, Bhalavat RL et al (1999) Interstitial brachytherapy in carcinoma of the penis. Strahlenther Onkol 175:17–20
Gotsadze D, Matveev B, Zak B et al (2000) Is conservative organ-sparing treatment of penile carcinoma justified? Eur Urol 38:306–312
Mistry T, Jones RW, Dannatt E et al (2007) A 10-year retrospective audit of penile cancer management in the UK. BJU Int 100:1277–1281
Neave F, Neal AJ, Hoskin PJ et al (1993) Carcinoma of the penis: a retrospective review of treatment with iridium mould and external beam irradiation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 5:207–210
Ozsahin M, Jichlinski P, Weber DC et al (2006) Treatment of penile carcinoma: to cut or not to cut? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66:674–679
Conflict of interest statement
There is no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crook, J., Ma, C. & Grimard, L. Radiation therapy in the management of the primary penile tumor: an update. World J Urol 27, 189–196 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0309-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0309-5