Skip to main content
Log in

MRI-based decision tree model for diagnosis of biliary atresia

  • Paediatric
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate MRI findings and to generate a decision tree model for diagnosis of biliary atresia (BA) in infants with jaundice.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed features of MRI and ultrasonography (US) performed in infants with jaundice between January 2009 and June 2016 under approval of the institutional review board, including the maximum diameter of periportal signal change on MRI (MR triangular cord thickness, MR-TCT) or US (US-TCT), visibility of common bile duct (CBD) and abnormality of gallbladder (GB). Hepatic subcapsular flow was reviewed on Doppler US. We performed conditional inference tree analysis using MRI findings to generate a decision tree model.

Results

A total of 208 infants were included, 112 in the BA group and 96 in the non-BA group. Mean age at the time of MRI was 58.7 ± 36.6 days. Visibility of CBD, abnormality of GB and MR-TCT were good discriminators for the diagnosis of BA and the MRI-based decision tree using these findings with MR-TCT cut-off 5.1 mm showed 97.3 % sensitivity, 94.8 % specificity and 96.2 % accuracy.

Conclusions

MRI-based decision tree model reliably differentiates BA in infants with jaundice. MRI can be an objective imaging modality for the diagnosis of BA.

Key Points

• MRI-based decision tree model reliably differentiates biliary atresia in neonatal cholestasis.

• Common bile duct, gallbladder and periportal signal changes are the discriminators.

• MRI has comparable performance to ultrasonography for diagnosis of biliary atresia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

3D:

Three-dimensional

AUC:

Area under the curve

BA:

Biliary atresia

CBD:

Common bile duct

CI:

Confidence interval

GB:

Gallbladder

HA:

Hepatic artery

MR-TCT:

MR triangular cord thickness

MRCP:

MR cholangiopancreatography

NPV:

Negative predictive value

OR:

Odds ratio

PPV:

Positive predictive value

PV:

Portal vein

ROC:

Receiver-operating characteristic

US:

Ultrasonography

US-TCT:

US triangular cord thickness

References

  1. Lakshminarayanan B, Davenport M (2016) Biliary atresia: A comprehensive review. J Autoimmun 73:1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsui A, Ishikawa T (1994) Identification of infants with biliary atresia in Japan. Lancet 343:925

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yoon PW, Bresee JS, Olney RS, James LM, Khoury MJ (1997) Epidemiology of biliary atresia: a population-based study. Pediatrics 99:376–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McKiernan PJ, Baker AJ, Kelly DA (2000) The frequency and outcome of biliary atresia in the UK and Ireland. Lancet 355:25–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Feldman AG, Sokol RJ (2013) Neonatal Cholestasis. Neoreviews 14

  6. Shinkai M, Ohhama Y, Take H et al (2009) Long-term outcome of children with biliary atresia who were not transplanted after the Kasai operation: >20-year experience at a children's hospital. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 48:443–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nio M, Ohi R, Miyano T et al (2003) Five- and 10-year survival rates after surgery for biliary atresia: a report from the Japanese Biliary Atresia Registry. J Pediatr Surg 38:997–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi SO, Park WH, Lee HJ, Woo SK (1996) 'Triangular cord': a sonographic finding applicable in the diagnosis of biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 31:363–366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee HJ, Lee SM, Park WH, Choi SO (2003) Objective criteria of triangular cord sign in biliary atresia on US scans. Radiology 229:395–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Azuma T, Nakamura T, Nakahira M, Harumoto K, Nakaoka T, Moriuchi T (2003) Pre-operative ultrasonographic diagnosis of biliary atresia--with reference to the presence or absence of the extrahepatic bile duct. Pediatr Surg Int 19:475–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim WS, Cheon JE, Youn BJ et al (2007) Hepatic arterial diameter measured with US: adjunct for US diagnosis of biliary atresia. Radiology 245:549–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee MS, Kim MJ, Lee MJ et al (2009) Biliary atresia: color doppler US findings in neonates and infants. Radiology 252:282–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. El-Guindi MA, Sira MM, Konsowa HA, El-Abd OL, Salem TA (2013) Value of hepatic subcapsular flow by color Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of biliary atresia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28:867–872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tan Kendrick AP, Phua KB, Ooi BC, Tan CE (2003) Biliary atresia: making the diagnosis by the gallbladder ghost triad. Pediatr Radiol 33:311–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou L, Shan Q, Tian W, Wang Z, Liang J, Xie X (2016) Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Biliary Atresia: A Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206:W73–W82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leschied JR, Dillman JR, Bilhartz J, Heider A, Smith EA, Lopez MJ (2015) Shear wave elastography helps differentiate biliary atresia from other neonatal/infantile liver diseases. Pediatr Radiol 45:366–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanquinet S, Courvoisier DS, Rougemont AL et al (2015) Contribution of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography to the ultrasound diagnosis of biliary atresia. Pediatr Radiol 45:1489–1495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Han SJ, Kim MJ, Han A et al (2002) Magnetic resonance cholangiography for the diagnosis of biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg 37:599–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu B, Cai J, Xu Y et al (2014) Three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of biliary atresia in infants and neonates. PLoS One 9:e88268

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sung S, Jeon TY, Yoo SY et al (2016) Incremental Value of MR Cholangiopancreatography in Diagnosis of Biliary Atresia. PLoS One 11:e0158132

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hothorn T, Hornik K, Zeileis A (2006) Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15:651–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Siles P, Aschero A, Gorincour G et al (2014) A prospective pilot study: Can the biliary tree be visualized in children younger than 3 months on Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography? Pediatric Radiology 44:1077–1084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim MJ, Park YN, Han SJ et al (2000) Biliary atresia in neonates and infants: triangular area of high signal intensity in the porta hepatis at T2-weighted MR cholangiography with US and histopathologic correlation. Radiology 215:395–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Avni FE, Segers V, De Maertelaer V et al (2002) The evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging of hepatic periportal fibrosis in infants with neonatal cholestasis: preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg 37:1128–1133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mo YH, Jaw FS, Ho MC, Wang YC, Peng SS (2011) Hepatic ADC value correlates with cirrhotic severity of patients with biliary atresia. Eur J Radiol 80:e253–e257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Peng SS, Jeng YM, Hsu WM, Yang JC, Ho MC (2015) Hepatic ADC map as an adjunct to conventional abdominal MRI to evaluate hepatic fibrotic and clinical cirrhotic severity in biliary atresia patients. Eur Radiol 25:2992–3002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Takahashi A, Hatakeyama S, Suzuki N et al (1997) MRI findings in the liver in biliary atresia patients after the Kasai operation. Tohoku J Exp Med 181:193–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. He JP, Hao Y, Wang XL, Yang XJ, Shao JF, Feng JX (2016) Comparison of different noninvasive diagnostic methods for biliary atresia: a meta-analysis. World J Pediatr 12:35–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mi-Jung Lee.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Eun Kyung Kim.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

As an author and an expert in statistics, Yun Ho Roh contributed statistical analyses of this manuscript.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board for this retrospective study.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• retrospective

• case-control

• performed at one institution

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, Y.H., Kim, MJ., Shin, H.J. et al. MRI-based decision tree model for diagnosis of biliary atresia. Eur Radiol 28, 3422–3431 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5327-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5327-0

Keywords

Navigation