Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Southern Ocean deep-sea isopod species richness (Crustacea, Malacostraca): influences of depth, latitude and longitude

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined deep-sea epibenthic sledge isopod data from the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean (SO) (depth range=742–5,191 m). Samples were taken during the expeditions EASIZ II (ANT XV-3) in 1998 and ANDEEP I and II (ANT XIX3/4) in 2002. A total of 471 isopod species were recorded from 28 sites. The species richness of the epibenthic sledge samples was highly variable (6–82 species). Species richness was highest at site 131-3 in 3,053 m depth in the north-eastern Weddell Sea. The highest numbers of species were sampled in the middle depth range and lower species richness was found in the shallower and deeper parts of the study area. Depth is suggested to explain isopod species richness better than both latitude and longitude. Between 58°S and 65°S, the number of species ranged from 9 to 82 (mean=35.9). Further south in the Weddell Sea, between 73°S and 74°S, species richness was lower and the number of species ranged from 6 to 35 (mean=19.2). With regard to longitude, the highest species richness (up to 82 species) was found between 50°W and 60°W in the area of the South Shetland Islands and around the Antarctic Peninsula, while numbers did not exceed 50 species in the eastern Weddell Sea. The haul length, ranging from 807 to 6,464 m, was positively correlated with depth; however, there was no linear relationship between haul length and species richness. We therefore suggest that depth was the most important factor explaining isopod species richness. However, only 28 sites were visited and the statistical power is thus limited. Sampling in the deep sea is expensive and time consuming and as yet this is the best isopod data set available from the Atlantic sector of the SO. Future expeditions are therefore important to better explain the current patterns of benthic diversity in Antarctica.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arntz WE, Brey T, Gallardo VA (1994) Antarctic zoobenthos. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 32:241–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Arntz A, Gutt J, Klages M (1997) Antarctic marine biodiversity: an overview. In: Battaglia B, Valencia J, Walton DWH (eds) Antarctic communities. Species, structure and survival. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt A (1991) Zur Besiedlungsgeschichte des antarktischen Schelfes am Beispiel der Isopoda (Crustacea, Malacostraca). Ber Polarforsch 98:1–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt A (1995) The Peracarida (Crustacea, Malacostraca) of the Northeast Water Polynya off Greenland, documenting close pelagic-benthic coupling. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 121:39–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt A (1997) Abundance, diversity and community patterns of epibenthic- and benthic-boundary layer peracarid crustaceans at 75°N off east Greenland. Polar Biol 17:159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt A (1999) On the origin and evolution of Antarctic Peracarida (Crustacea, Malacostraca). Sci Mar 63(1):261–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt A (2001) Do differences in peracarid crustacean density of Arctic and Antarctic deep sea reflect the age of the environments? Polar Biol 24:785–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt A (2004) Abundance, diversity, and community patterns of isopods in the Weddell Sea (Crustacea, Isopoda). Antarct Sci 16(1):5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt A, Barthel D (1995) An improved supra- and epibenthic sledge for catching Peracarida (Crustacea, Malacostraca). Ophelia 43(1):15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt A, Schnack K (1999) Macrofaunal abundance at 79°N off East Greenland: opposing data from epibenthic-sledge and box-corer samples. Polar Biol 22:75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt A, Brökeland W, Brix S, Malyutina M (2004) Diversity of Antarctic deep-sea Isopoda (Crustacea, Malacostraca)—a comparison with shelf data. Deep-Sea Reasearch II Special ANDEEP volume (in press)

  • Clarke A (1996) Benthic marine habitats in Antarctica. In: Ross RM, Hoffman EE, Quentin LB (eds) Origins and evolution of the Antarctic Biota. Geol Soc Spec Publ 47:253–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke A, Johnston NM (2003) Antarctic marine benthic diversity. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 41:47–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke A, Lidgard S (2000) Spatial patterns of diversity in the sea: bryozoan species richness in the Northern Atlantic. J Anim Ecol 69: 799–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Broyer C, Jazdzewski K, Dauby P (2002) Biodiversity patterns in the Southern Ocean: lessons from Crustacea. In: Huiskes AHL, Gieskes WWC, Rozema J, Schorno RML, van der Vies SM, Wolff WJ (eds) Antarctic biology in a global context, Backhuys, Leiden, pp 210–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellingsen KE, Gray JS (2002) Spatial patterns of benthic diversity: is there a latitudinal gradient along the Norwegian continental shelf? J Anim Ecol 71:373–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage JD (1997) High benthic species diversity in deep-sea sediments: the importance of hydrodynamics. In: Ormond RFG, Gage JD, Angel MV (eds) Marine biodiversity: patterns and processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 148–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage JD, Tyler PA (1991) Deep-sea biology: a natural history of organisms at the deep-sea floor. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 1–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeron J, Sibuet M, Vanreusel A, Mackenzie K, Gooday AJ, Dinet A, Wolff GA (2001) Temporal patterns among meiofauna and macrofauna taxa related to changes in sediment geochemistry at an abyssal NE Atlantic site. Prog Oceanogr 50:303–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Chown SL (1999) Geographic range size and speciation. In: Magurran AE, Rm M May (eds) Evolution of biological diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 236–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessler RR, Thistle D (1975) On the place of origin of deep-sea isopods. Mar Biol 32:155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbig B (1994) Faunistic and zoogeographical characterization of the benthic infauna on the Carolina continental slope. Deep-Sea Res II 41:929–950

    Google Scholar 

  • Kröncke I (1998) Macrofauna communities in the Amundsen Basin, at the Morris Jesup Rise and at the Yermak Plateau (Eurasian Arctic Ocean). Polar Biol 19:383–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kussakin OG (1967) Fauna of Isopoda and Tanaidacea in the coastal zones of the Antarctic and Subantarctic waters. [Translation from Russian by the Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1968.]. Biological Reports of the Soviet Antarctic Expedition (1955–1958) vol 3, pp 220–389

  • Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine LA, Etter RJ, Rex MA, Gooday AJ, Smith CR, Pineda J, Stuart CT, Hessler RR, Pawson D (2001) Environmental influences on regional deep-sea species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:51–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lörz AN, Brandt A (2003) Composition of suprabenthic Peracarida (Crustacea, Malacostraca) during the Antarctic autumn. Antarct Sci 15(4):433–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzies RJ (1962) The isopods of abyssal depths in the Atlantic Ocean. Vema Res Ser 1:79–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Poore G, Just J, Cohen BF (1994) Composition and diversity of Crustacea Isopoda of the southeastern Australian continental slope. Deep-Sea Res 41:677–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R-Development-Core-Team (2004) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

  • San Vicente C, Ramos A, Jimeno A, Sorbe JC (1997) Suprabenthic assemblages from South Shetland Islands and Bransfield Strait (Antarctica): priliminary observations an faunistical composition, bathymetric and near-bottom distribution. Polar Biol 18:415–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders HL, Hessler RR (1969) Ecology of the deep-sea benthos. Science 163:1419–1424

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snelgrove PVR, Smith CR (2002) A riot of species in an environmental calm: the paradox of the species-rich deep-sea floor. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 40:311–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb SL, Gaston KJ (2000) Geographic range size and evolutionary age in birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1843–1850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zenkevitch LA, Birstein JA (1960) On the problem of the antiquity deep-sea fauna. Deep-Sea Res 7:10–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support for the ANDEEP I and II expeditions was provided by the German Science Foundation Br 1121/20–3; 436 RUS 17/91/03; 436 RUS 17/19/04). K.E.E. acknowledges the support of the Norwegian Research Council. We are grateful to Prof. W. Arntz, Chief Scientist on Polarstern Cruise ANT XV-3, and to Prof. D. Fütterer, Chief Scientist on Polarstern Cruises ANT XIX/3–4, and to the captains and crew of RV Polarstern, for help on board. Alexandra Toletti, Anna Marquart, Britta Wulf and David Hopff are thanked for their help with sorting of the EBS material, and the DZMB for financial support of sorting. This is ANDEEP publication no. 41.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Brandt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brandt, A., Ellingsen, K.E., Brix, S. et al. Southern Ocean deep-sea isopod species richness (Crustacea, Malacostraca): influences of depth, latitude and longitude. Polar Biol 28, 284–289 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-004-0688-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-004-0688-z

Keywords

Navigation