Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of ultrasound (US)-guided intra-articular injections by in-plain and out-of-plain on medial portal of the knee

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To compare the accuracy rates between ultrasound (US)-guided in-plain (IP), out-of-plain (OOP) and blind knee intra-articular (IA) injection via the mid-medial portal. US-guided IA injection in the IP, OOP, and blind methods was performed on 126 knees with radiographically confirmed knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3) without effusion. About 6 ml of a mixed material containing 1 % lidocaine (1 mL) and triamcinolone 20 mg (1 mL) and nonionic contrast (4 mL) was injected into the IA space of the knee through the mid-medial portals. After an US-guided and blind IA injection into the knee joint, a radiographic image was taken to determine whether the injected material had reached the IA space or infiltrated into the soft tissue. US-guided IA injections in the IP (97 %; P < 0.05) and OOP method (95 %; P < 0.05) showed significantly higher accuracy rate than injections in the blind injection (78 %). Both US-guided IA injection methods may be used to access the knee joint with high degree of accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lussier A, Cividino AA, McFarlane CA, Olszynski WP, Potashner WJ, De Médicis R (1996) Viscosupplementation with hylan for the treatment of osteoarthritis: findings from clinical practice in Canada. J Rheumatol 23:1579–1585

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Im SH, Lee SC, Park YB, Cho SR, Kim JC (2009) Feasibility of sonography for intra-articular injections in the knee through a medial patella portal. J Ultrasound Med 28:1465–1470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Luc M, Pham T, Chagnaud C, Lafforgue P, Legre V (2006) Placement of intraarticular injection verified by the backflow technique. Osteoarthr Cartil 14:714–716

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bianchi S, Zamorani MP (2007) US-guided interventional procedures. In: Bianchi S, Martinoli C (eds) Ultrasound of the musculoskeletal system, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 891–917

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Qvistgaard E, Kristoffersen H, Terslev L, Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Torp-Pedersen S, Bliddal H (2001) Guidance by ultrasound of intra-articular injections in the knee and hip joints. Osteoarthr Cartil 9:512–517

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Park Y, Lee SC, Nam HS, Lee J, Nam SH (2011) Comparison of sonographically guided intra-articular injections at 3 different sites of the knee. J Ultrasound Med 30:1669–1676

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Osteoarthritis Guidelines (2000) Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Arthritis Rheum 43:1905–1915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Naredo E, Cabero F, Palop MJ, Collado P, Cruz A, Crespo M (2005) Ultrasonographic findings in knee osteoarthritis: a comparative study with clinical and radiographic assessment. Osteoarthr Cartil 13:568–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maillefert JF, Hudry C, Baron G et al (2001) Laterally elevated wedged insoles in the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized controlled study. Osteoarthr Cartil 9:738–745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bum Park Y, Ah Choi W, Kim YK, Chul Lee S, Hae Lee J (2012) Accuracy of blind versus ultrasound-guided suprapatellar bursal injection. J Clin Ultrasound 40:20–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Esenyel C, Demirhan M, Esenyel M et al (2007) Comparison of four different intra-articular injection sites in the knee: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:573–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jackson DW, Evans NA, Thomas BM (2002) Accuracy of needle placement into the intra-articular space of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1522–1527

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Toda Y, Tsukimura N (2008) A comparison of intra-articular hyaluronan injection accuracy rates between three approaches based on radiographic severity of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 16:980–985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Balint PV, Kane D, Hunter J, McInnes IB, Field M, Sturrock RD (2002) Ultrasound guided versus conventional joint and soft tissue aspiration in rheumatology practice: a pilot study. J Rheumatol 29:2209–2213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gray AT (2006) Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: current state of the art. Anesthesiology 104:368–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Souzdalnitski D, Lerman I, Halaszynski TM (2011) How to improve needle visibility. In: Narouze SN (ed) Atlas of ultrasound-guided procedures in interventional pain management, 1st edn. Springer, New York, pp 35–75

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Marhofer P, Greher M, Kapral S (2005) Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 94:7–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Luchs JS, Sofka CM, Adler RS (2007) Sonographic contrast effect of combined steroid and anesthetic injections: in vitro analysis. J Ultrasound Med 26:227–231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bloc S, Ecoffey C, Dhonneur G (2008) Controlling needle tip progression during ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia using the hydrolocalization technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med 33:382–383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Elahi S, Cahue S, Felson DT, Engelman L, Sharma L (2000) The association between varus-valgus alignment and patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 43:1874–1880

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Berqquist TH (2002) Knee. In: Berquist TH (ed) Musculoskeletal imaging companion, 1st edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, pp 210–307

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cole BJ, Schumacher HR Jr (2005) Injectable corticosteroids in modern practice. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13:37–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cheng J, Abdi S (2007) Complications of joint, tendon and muscle injections. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag 11:141–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Charalambous CP, Tryfonidis M, Sadiq S, Hirst P, Paul A (2003) Septic arthritis following intra-articular steroid injection of the knee—a survey of current practice regarding antiseptic technique used during intra-articular steroid injection of the knee. Clin Rheumatol 22:386–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cervini P, Hesley GK, Thompson RL, Sampathkumar P, Knudsen JM (2010) Incidence of infectious complications after an ultrasound-guided intervention AJR. Am J Roentgenol 195:846–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the research fund of Hanyang University (HY-2006-N).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongbum Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jang, S.H., Lee, S.C., Lee, J.H. et al. Comparison of ultrasound (US)-guided intra-articular injections by in-plain and out-of-plain on medial portal of the knee. Rheumatol Int 33, 1951–1959 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-012-2660-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-012-2660-5

Keywords

Navigation