Skip to main content
Log in

Waste management in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex echinatior: the role of worker size, age and plasticity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Division of labour is the hallmark of the success of many social animals. It may be especially important with regard to waste management because waste often contains pathogens or hazardous toxins and worker specialisation can reduce the number of group members exposed to it. Here we examine waste management in a fungus-farming, leaf-cutting ant, Acromyrmex echinatior, in which waste management is necessary to protect their vulnerable fungal crop. By marking ants with task-specific paint colours, we found clear division of labour between workers that engage in waste management and those that forage, at least during the fine timescale of the 3-day marking period. This division of labour was influenced by both age and size, with waste management workers tending to be smaller and younger than foragers. The role of preventing contaminated ants from entering the colony was fulfilled mainly by medium-sized workers. When the level of waste was experimentally increased, most of the ants that responded to remove the waste were workers previously engaged in tasks inside the nest rather than external waste workers or foragers. These responding workers tended to be young and medium-sized. Surprisingly, the responding ants were subsequently able to revert back to working within the fungus garden, but the probability of them doing so depended on their age and the length of time they were exposed to waste. The results demonstrate the importance of division of labour with regard to waste management in A. echinatior and show that this is adaptable to changing needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ballari S, Farji-Brener A, Tadey M (2007) Waste management in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex lobicornis: division of labour, aggressive behaviour, and location of external refuse dumps. J Ins Behav 20:87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton TG, Foster WA (1992) Altruistic housekeeping in a social aphid. Proc R Soc Lond B 247:199–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beshers SN, Fewell JH (2001) Models of division of labor in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:413–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beshers SN, Robinson GE, Mittenthal J (1999) Response thresholds and division of labor in insect colonies. In: Detrain C, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (eds) Information processing in social insects. Birkhauser, Basel, pp 115–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G (1999) Role and variability of response thresholds in the regulation of division of labor in insect societies. In: Detrain C, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (eds) Information processing in social insects. Birkhauser, Basel, pp 141–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg J-L (1996) Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1565–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bot ANM, Currie CR, Hart AG, Boomsma JJ (2001) Waste management in leaf-cutting ants. Ethol Ecol Evol 13:225–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Breed MD, Williams DB, Queral A (2002) Demand for task performance and workforce replacement: undertakers in honeybee, Apis mellifera, colonies. J Ins Behav 15:319–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown MJF, Bot ANM, Hart AG (2006) Mortality rates and division of labor in the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica. J Ins Sci 6:18

    Google Scholar 

  • Camargo RS, Forti LC, Lopes JFS, Andrade APP, Ottati ALT (2007) Age polyethism in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex subterraneus brunneus Forel, 1911 (Hym., Formicidae). J Appl Entomol 131:139–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman NC, Oldroyd BP, Hughes WOH (2007) Differential responses of honeybee (Apis mellifera) patrilines to changes in stimuli for the generalist tasks of nursing and foraging. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1185–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie CR (2001) Prevalence and impact of a virulent parasite on a tripartite mutualism. Oecologia 128:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie CR, Stuart AE (2001) Weeding and grooming of pathogens in agriculture by ants. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1033–1039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Currie CR, Mueller UG, Malloch D (1999a) The agricultural pathology of ant fungus gardens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:7998–8002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Currie CR, Scott JA, Summerbell RC, Malloch D (1999b) Fungus-growing ants use antibiotic-producing bacteria to control garden parasites. Nature 398:701–704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Currie CR, Wong B, Stuart AE, Schultz TR, Rehner SA, Mueller UG, Sung GH, Spatafora JW, Straus NA (2003) Ancient tripartite coevolution in the attine ant–microbe symbiosis. Science 299:386–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Detrain C, Pasteels JM (1991) Caste differences in behavioral thresholds as a basis for polyethism during food recruitment in the ant Pheidole pallidula (Nyl.) (Hymenoptera: Myrmicinae). J Insect Physiol 4:157–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus A (2008) Specialization does not predict individual efficiency in an ant. PLoS Biol 6:e285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feener DH, Moss KAG (1990) Defense against parasites by hitchhikers in leaf-cutting ants—a quantitative assessment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fewell JH, Bertram SM (1999) Division of labor in a dynamic environment: response by honeybees (Apis mellifera) to graded changes in colony pollen stores. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forti LC, Camargo RS, de Matos CAO, de Andrade APP, Lopes JFS (2004) Aloetismo em Acromyrmex subterraneus brunneus Forel (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), durante o forrageamento, cultivo do jardim de fungo e devolução dos materials forrageados. Rev Bras Ent 48:59–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM (1996) The organization of work in social insect colonies. Nature 380:121–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon DM, Mehdiabadi NJ (1999) Encounter rate and task allocation in harvester ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:370–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart AG, Ratnieks FLW (2001) Task partitioning, division of labour and nest compartmentalisation collectively isolate hazardous waste in the leafcutting ant Atta cephalotes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:387–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart AG, Ratnieks FLW (2002) Waste management in the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica. Behav Ecol 13:224–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The Ants. Belknap, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes WOH, Boomsma JJ (2007) Genetic polymorphism in leaf-cutting ants is phenotypically plastic. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:1625–1630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes WOH, Eilenberg J, Boomsma JJ (2002) Trade-offs in group living: transmission and disease resistance in leaf-cutting ants. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1811–1819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes WOH, Goulson D (2001) Polyethism and the importance of context in the alarm reaction of the grass-cutting ant, Atta capiguara. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:503–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes WOH, Howse PE, Vilela EF, Goulson D (2001) The response of grass-cutting ants to natural and synthetic versions of their alarm pheromone. Physiol Entomol 26:165–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes WOH, Sumner S, Van Borm S, Boomsma JJ (2003) Worker caste polymorphism has a genetic basis in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:9394–9397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes WOH, Thomsen L, Eilenberg J, Boomsma JJ (2004) Diversity of entomopathogenic fungi near leaf-cutting ant nests in a Neotropical forest, with particular reference to Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae. J Invertebr Pathol 85:46–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DE, Hart AG (2009) Does sanitation facilitate sociality? Anim Behav 77:e1–e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson R, Clark RM, Holbrook CT, Bertram SM, Fewell JH, Kukuk PF (2008) Division of labour and socially induced changes in response thresholds in associations of solitary halictine bees. Anim Behav 76:593–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julian GE, Cahan S (1999) Undertaking specialization in the desert leaf-cutter ant Acromyrmex versicolor. Anim Behav 58:437–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linksvayer TA, McCall AC, Jensen RM, Marshall CM, Miner JW, McKone MJ (2002) The function of hitchhiking behavior in the leaf-cutting ant Atta cephalotes. Biotropica 34:93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Little AEF, Currie CR (2008) Black yeast symbionts compromise the efficiency of antibiotic defenses in fungus-growing ants. Ecology 89:1216–1222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD (1974) The social behavior of bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikheyev AS, Vo T, Mueller UG (2008) Phylogeography of post-Pleistocene population expansion in a fungus-gardening ant and its microbial mutualists. Mol Ecol 17:4480–4488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller UG, Dash D, Rabeling C, Rodrigues A (2008) Coevolution between attine ants and actinomycete bacteria: a reevaluation. Evolution 62:2894–2912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orr MR (1992) Parasitic flies (Diptera, Phoridae) influence foraging rhythms and caste division of labor in the leaf-cutter ant, Atta cephalotes (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Page RE, Robinson GE, Britton DS, Fondrk MK (1992) Genotypic variability for rates of behavioral development in worker honeybees (Apis mellifera L). Behav Ecol 3:173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pankiw T, Page RE (1999) The effect of genotype, age, sex, and caste on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). J Comp Physiol A 185:207–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ravary F, Lecoutey E, Kaminski G, Chaline N, Jaisson P (2007) Individual experience alone can generate lasting division of labor in ants. Curr Biol 17:1308–1312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GE (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 37:637–665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel P (1998) Parasites in social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Seid M, Traniello J (2006) Age-related repertoire expansion and division of labor in Pheidole dentata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a new perspective on temporal polyethism and behavioral plasticity in ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:631–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CR, Toth AL, Suarez AV, Robinson GE (2008) Genetic and genomic analyses of the division of labour in insect societies. Nature Rev Gen 9:735–748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E, Deneubourg JL (1998) Response threshold reinforcement and division of labour in insect societies. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:327–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uribe-Rubio J, Guzmán-Novoa E, Vázquez-Peláez C, Hunt G (2008) Genotype, task specialization, and nest environment influence the stinging response thresholds of individual Africanized and European honeybees to electrical stimulation. Behav Genet 38:93–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker TN, Hughes WOH (2009) Adaptive social immunity in leaf-cutting ants. Biol Lett 5:446–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weidenmuller A (2004) The control of nest climate in bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) colonies: interindividual variability and self reinforcement in fanning response. Behav Ecol 15:120–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetterer JK (1999) The ecology and evolution of worker size-distribution in leaf-cutting ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 34:119–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1980a) Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Atta). 2. The ergonomic optimization of leaf cutting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1980b) Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta). I. The overall pattern in A. sexdens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston ML (1995) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yackulic CB, Lewis OT (2007) Temporal variation in foraging activity and efficiency and the role of hitchhiking behaviour in the leaf-cutting ant, Atta cephalotes. Ent Exp Appl 125:125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanagawa A, Yokohari F, Shimizu S (2008) Defense mechanism of the termite, Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki, to entomopathogenic fungi. J Invertebr Pathol 97:165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute for facilities in Gamboa, the Autoridad Nacional del Ambiente (ANAM) for permission to collect and export the ants, J.J. Boomsma for providing the ant colonies, L. A. Santorelli, C. L. Frost, F. R. Ryan and A. Reynolds for technical assistance, the referees for their constructive comments and the Leverhulme Foundation for funding. The work described in this article complies with the current laws of the countries in which it was performed. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William O. H. Hughes.

Additional information

Communicated by: J.Traniello

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waddington, S.J., Hughes, W.O.H. Waste management in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex echinatior: the role of worker size, age and plasticity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64, 1219–1228 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0936-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0936-x

Keywords

Navigation