Skip to main content
Log in

Social cohesion and foraging decrease with group size in fallow deer (Dama dama)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the impact of group size on foraging behaviour and level of movement synchronisation among female herdmates of a fallow deer population in Central Italy. Both proportion of foraging events and movement synchronisation decreased with increasing group size. The proportion of foraging events was higher for animals on the edge of the group than for deer in the centre of the group; hence, there appears to be a trade-off between protection against predators and foraging interference, both of which decrease from the centre to the periphery of the group. This is the first time this type of behaviour has been recorded for wild ungulates. As expected, we also found that the movement of peripheral animals was less synchronised than that of central animals. Consequently, peripheral animals may lose contact with their herdmates and split off the group. We conclude that social inequalities may lead to conflicting requirements among group members and instability of large groups. Movement synchronisation (as a function of group size) appears to interact with habitat openness to produce variations of group size (which appear to be adaptive for individuals) as an emergent property of these aggregations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander McNeill R (2004) Hitching a lift hydrodynamically—in swimming, flying and cycling. J Biol 3:7 (electronic publication)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Apollonio M, Focardi S, Toso S, Necci L (1998) Habitat selection and group formation pattern of fallow deer Dama dama in a submediterranean environment. Ecography 21:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecham JA, Farnsworth KD (1999) Animal group forces resulting from predator avoidance and competition minimization. J Theor Biol 198:533–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J, Cunningham C (1994) Bison: mating and conservation in small populations. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthold P (1996) Control of bird migration. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brashares JS, Garland T, Arcese P (2000) Phylogenetic analysis of coadaptation in behaviour, diet and body size in the African antelope. Behav Ecol 11:452–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conradt L, Roper TJ (2000) Activity synchrony and social cohesion: a fission–fusion model. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 267:2213–2218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Couzin ID, Krause J, James R, Ruxton GD, Franks NR (2002) Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. J Theor Biol 218:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Focardi S, Marcellini P, Montanaro P (1996) Do ungulates exhibit a food density threshold? A field study of optimal foraging and movement patterns. J Anim Ecol 65:606–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Focardi S, Farnsworth K, Poli BM, Ponzetta MP, Tinelli A (2003) Sexual segregation in ungulates: individual behaviour and the missing link. Pop Ecol 45:83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert BK, Hailman JP (1966) Uncertainty of leadership rank in fallow deer. Nature 209:1041–1042

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerard J-F, Loisel P (1995) Spontaneous emergency of a relationship between habitat openness and mean group size and its possible evolutionary consequences in large herbivores. J Theor Biol 176:511–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerard J-F, Bideau E, Maublanc M-L, Loisel P, Marchal C (2002) Herd size in large herbivores: encoded in the individual or emergent? Biol Bull 202:275–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gueron S, Levin SA (1995) The dynamic of group formation. Math Biosci 128:243–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry of the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 182:85–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarman PJ (1974) The social organization of antelopes in relation to their ecology. Behavior 48:215–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindström K, Ranta E (1993) Foraging group structure among individuals differing in competitive ability. Ann Zool Fenn 30:225–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Okubo A (1980) Diffusion and ecological problems: mathematical models. Biomathematics, vol 10. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens T, McConville D (1996) Geospatial application: estimating the spatial accuracy of coordinates collected using the Global Positioning System. National Biological Service, Environmental Management Technical Centre, Onalaska, Wisconsin, LTRMP 96-T002, 13 pp. ftp://ftp.umesc.usgs.gov/pub/media_archives/documents/reports/1996/96t002.pdf

  • Owen-Smith N (1979) Assessing the foraging efficiency of a large herbivore, the kudu. S Afr J Wildl Res 9:102–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrish JK, Edelstein-Keshet L (1999) Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. Science 284:99–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish JK, Viscido SV, Grünbaum D (2002) Self-organised fish schools: an examination of emergent properties. Biol Bull 202:296–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pignatti S, Bianco PM, Tescarollo P, Scarascia Mugnozza GT (2001) La vegetazione della Tenuta Presidenziale di Castelporziano. Accademia Nazionale delle Scienze detta dei XL, Scritti e Documenti 26:441–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins HHT (1996) Ecology and behaviour of the African buffalo. Social inequality and decision making. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Réale D, Festa-Bianchet M (2003) Predator-induced natural selection on temperament in bighorn ewes. Anim Behav 65:463–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2000) SAS OnlineDoc, Version 8, SAS Institute Inc. http://www.sas.com/ts

  • Sibly RM (1983) Optimal group size is unstable. Anim Behav 31:947–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thouless CR (1990) Feeding competition between grazing red deer hinds. Anim Behav 40:105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood R (1983) The feeding behaviour of grazing African ungulates. Behaviour 84:195–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Segretariato alla Presidenza della Repubblica for permission to work at Castelporziano and P Montanaro for helping with field work. JF Gerard reviewed a first draft of the paper and gave us relevant comments. M Festa Bianchet and an anonymous referee provided useful comments and corrections to the manuscript. HC Hauffe corrected the final manuscript

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Focardi.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Festa-Bianchet

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Focardi, S., Pecchioli, E. Social cohesion and foraging decrease with group size in fallow deer (Dama dama). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59, 84–91 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0012-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0012-0

Keywords

Navigation