Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical treatment of unstable pelvic fractures with concomitant acetabular fractures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To explore the diagnosis, treatment, and clinical prognosis of patients with both unstable pelvic fractures and concomitant acetabular fractures.

Material and methods

We retrospectively analyzed 21 cases of unstable pelvic fractures with concomitant acetabular fractures treated between January 2013 and December 2014. All 21 patients (18 males, 3 females), aged 43.5–55 years (range: 21–55 years), underwent surgery within four to 15 days (average = 6.5 days) after injury. We evaluated the pre-operative diagnoses, surgical approaches, types of fixation used, and prognoses.

Results

All 21 patients were followed-up for six to 18 months. The quality of post-operative pelvic fracture reduction (determined using the Matta scoring criteria) was excellent in five cases, good in 12, and fair in four. The clinical outcomes at the final follow-up (scored using the Majeed criteria) were excellent in ten cases, good in eight, and fair in three. The quality of post-operative acetabular fracture reduction (determined using the Matta scoring criteria) was excellent in five cases, good in 11, and poor in five. Hip joint function was evaluated at the final follow-up (using the D’Aubigné scoring system) and was excellent in eight cases, good in nine, and fair in four. The healing time was 12–18 weeks for pelvic fractures and 12–22 weeks for acetabular fractures. Post-operative wound infections in two patients were controlled after second operations featuring debridement and irrigation. We found no instance of heterotopic ossification, ischemic necrosis of the femoral head, or iatrogenic vascular or nerve injury.

Conclusions

Good therapeutic outcomes in patients with unstable pelvic fractures and concomitant acetabular fractures can be achieved via accurate diagnosis, careful pre-operative planning, a well-performed operation, effective reduction and surgical fixation, and appropriate exercise to allow functional rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karadimas EJ, Nicolson T, Kakagia DD et al (2011) Angiographic embolisation of pelvic ring injuries. Treatment algorithm and review of the literature. Int Orthop 35:1381–1390

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Halawi MJ (2016) Pelvic ring injuries: emergency assessment and management. J Clin Orthop Trauma 6:252–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Poenaru DV, Popescu M, Anglitoiu B et al (2015) Emergency pelvic stabilization in patients with pelvic posttraumatic instability. Int Orthop 39:961–965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tile M (1988) Pelvic ring fractures: should they be fixed? J Bone Joint Surge(Br) 70:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Letournel E (1980) Acetabulum fracture: classification and management. Clin Orthop 151:81–106

    Google Scholar 

  6. Matta JM, Tornetta P (1996) Internal fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329:129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Matta JM (1996) Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg(Am) 78(11):1632–1645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Majeed SA (1989) Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 71:304–306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gansslen A, Pohlemann T, Paul C et al (1996) Epidemiology of pelvic ring injuries. Injury 27(Suppl 1):SA13–SA20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vaidya R, Oliphant BW, Hudson I et al (2013) Sequential reduction and fixation for windswept pelvic ring injuries (LC3) corrects the deformity until healed. Int Orthop 37:1555–1560

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Ekstein C et al (2011) Early definitive stabilization of unstable pelvis and acetabulum fractures reduces morbidity. J Trauma 69:677–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Takashi S, Wade RS, David JH et al (2010) Combined injuries of the pelvis and acetabulum: nature of a devastating dyad. J Orthop Trauma 24:303–308

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu S, Wang M, Wu X et al (2005) Operative treatment of compound acetabular fractures through single ilioinguinal approach. Chin J Orthop Trauma 7:1025–1027

    Google Scholar 

  14. Matta JM (1994) Operative treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioinguinal approach. A 10 -year perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81472146) and the Natural Science Foundation of WenZhou City (grant no. Y20160135). The funders played no role in the study design, data collection or analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianshun Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethics statement

All procedures involving human participants were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of our institutional and national research committees, and with those of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and later amendments thereof, or comparable ethical standards. Formal Ethics Board consent was not required for this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, L., Lou, Y., Guo, X. et al. Surgical treatment of unstable pelvic fractures with concomitant acetabular fractures. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 1803–1811 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3532-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3532-0

Keywords

Navigation