Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical outcome and return to work following single-stage combined autologous chondrocyte implantation and high tibial osteotomy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Concomitant unloading procedures, such as high tibial osteotomy (HTO), are increasingly recognized as an important part of cartilage repair. This study presents survival rate, functional outcome, complication rate, and return to work following combined single-stage autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and HTO.

Methods

Forty patients with a mean follow-up of 60 months with isolated full thickness cartilage defects of the medial femoral condyle (MFC) and concomitant varus deformity were included in this retrospective case series. All patients were treated with a single-stage combined ACI and HTO between January 2004 and December 2010. Functional outcome was evaluated prior to surgery and at follow-up using standard scores (Lysholm, VAS, KOOS). Treatment failure was defined as the need for re-operation. Return to work was evaluated using the REFA score.

Results

With all patients (mean age 36.8 SD ± 8.1 years; varus deformity 4.9 ± 1.8 °; mean defect size 4.6 ± 2.1 cm²) a clinical investigation was performed a mean of 60.5 months (SD ± 2.5) postoperatively. Four patients required reintervention (failure rate 10 %). VAS decreased significantly from 6.7 ± 1.9 points preoperatively to 2.2 ± 1.3 points postoperatively. The mean Lysholm score at follow-up was 76.2 ± 19.8 points. The mean KOOS subscales were 81.4 ± 18.0 for pain, 81.3 ± 14.0 for symptoms, 87.6 ± 16.2 for activity in daily living, 66.7 ± 22.8 for function in sport and recreation, and 55.5 ± 22.0 for knee-related quality of living. Mean duration of incapacity from work was 94.5 ± 77 days. Absenteeism from work depended on work load (return to work REFA 0: 68.9 ± 61.4 days vs. REFA 4: 155.0 ± 111.0 days).

Conclusion

Single-stage autologous chondrocyte implantation and concomitant high tibial osteotomy is a reliable and safe treatment with satisfying clinical outcome and improved functional outcome. However, we found a remarkable stay at work rate, which depended on the work load.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agneskirchner JD, Freiling D, Hurschler C et al. (2006) Primary stability of four different implants for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(3):291–300

  2. Amendola A (2007) Knee osteotomy and meniscal transplantation: indications, technical considerations, and results. Sports Med Arthrosc 15(1):32–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Amendola A, Bonasia DE (2010) Results of high tibial osteotomy: review of the literature. Int Orthop 34(2):155–160

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Behrens P, Bosch U, Bruns J et al (2004) [Indications and implementation of recommendations of the working group “tissue regeneration and tissue substitutes” for autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT)]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142(5):529–539

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bode G, Schmal H, Pestka JM et al (2013) A non-randomized controlled clinical trial on autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in cartilage defects of the medial femoral condyle with or without high tibial osteotomy in patients with varus deformity of less than 5 degrees. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(1):43–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bode G, von Heyden J, Pestka J et al (2013) Prospective 5-year survival rate data following open-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2762-y

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buckwalter JAMJ, Brown TD (2006) Perspectives on chondrocyte mechanobiology and osteoarthritis. Biorheology 43(3–4):603–609

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cicuttini F, Ding C, Wluka A et al (2005) Association of cartilage defects with loss of knee cartilage in healthy, middle-age adults: a prospective study. Arthritis Rheum 52(7):2033–2039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cole BJ, Pascual-Garrido C, Grumet RC (2009) Surgical management of articular cartilage defects in the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(7):1778–1790

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Edwards PK, Ackland TR, Ebert JR (2013) Accelerated weightbearing rehabilitation after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation in the tibiofemoral joint: early clinical and radiological outcomes. Am J Sports Med 41(10):2314–2324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Floerkemeier S, Staubli AE, Schroeter S et al (2012) Outcome after high tibial open-wedge osteotomy: a retrospective evaluation of 533 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):170–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Floerkemeier S, Staubli AE, Schroeter S et al (2013) Outcome after high tibial open-wedge osteotomy: a retrospective evaluation of 533 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):170–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Franceschi F, Longo UG, Ruzzini L et al (2008) Simultaneous arthroscopic implantation of autologous chondrocytes and high tibial osteotomy for tibial chondral defects in the varus knee. Knee 15(4):309–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hangody LFP (2003) Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weight-bearing axis joints: ten year of experimental and clinical experience. Injury 39(Suppl1):32–39

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harris JD, McNeilan R, Siston RA et al (2013) Survival and clinical outcome of isolated high tibial osteotomy and combined biological knee reconstruction. Knee. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2012.12.012

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harris JD, Siston RA, Brophy RH et al (2011) Failures, re-operations, and complications after autologous chondrocyte implantation–a systematic review. Osteoarthr Cartil 19(7):779–791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Heir S, Nerhus TK, Rotterud JH et al (2010) Focal cartilage defects in the knee impair quality of life as much as severe osteoarthritis: a comparison of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score in 4 patient categories scheduled for knee surgery. Am J Sports Med 38(2):231–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hirschmuller A, Baur H, Braun S et al (2011) Rehabilitation after autologous chondrocyte implantation for isolated cartilage defects of the knee. Am J Sports Med 39(12):2686–2696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoell S, Suttmoeller J, Stoll V et al (2005) The high tibial osteotomy, open versus closed wedge, a comparison of methods in 108 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125(9):638–643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lattermann CJR (1996) High tibial osteotomy alone or combined with ligament reconstruction in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 4(1):32–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Macmull S, Jaiswal PK, Bentley G et al (2012) The role of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the treatment of symptomatic chondromalacia patellae. Int Orthop 36(7):1371–1377

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McNamara I, Birmingham TB, Fowler PJ et al (2013) High tibial osteotomy: evolution of research and clinical applications–a Canadian experience. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):23–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller BS, Downie B, McDonough EB et al (2009) Complications after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 25(6):639–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mina C, Garrett WE Jr, Pietrobon R et al (2008) High tibial osteotomy for unloading osteochondral defects in the medial compartment of the knee. Am J Sports Med 36(5):949–955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Minas T, Gomoll AH, Solhpour S et al (2010) Autologous chondrocyte implantation for joint preservation in patients with early osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(1):147–157

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Muller M, Strecker W (2008) Arthroscopy prior to osteotomy around the knee? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128(11):1217–1221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Niemeyer P, Lenz P, Kreuz PC et al (2010) Chondrocyte-seeded type I/III collagen membrane for autologous chondrocyte transplantation: prospective 2-year results in patients with cartilage defects of the knee joint. Arthroscopy 26(8):1074–1082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Niemeyer P, Salzmann G, Feucht M et al (2014) First-generation versus second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation for treatment of cartilage defects of the knee: a matched-pair analysis on long-term clinical outcome. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2368-0

    Google Scholar 

  29. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Hewett TE (2000) High tibial osteotomy and ligament reconstruction for varus angulated anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Am J Sports Med 28(3):282–296

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pape D, Kohn D, van Giffen N et al (2013) Differences in fixation stability between spacer plate and plate fixator following high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):82–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rogers BA, David LA, Briggs TW (2010) Sequential outcome following autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee: a six-year follow-up. Int Orthop 34(7):959–964

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schinhan M, Gruber M, Vavken P et al (2012) Critical-size defect induces unicompartmental osteoarthritis in a stable ovine knee. J Orthop Res 30(2):214–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schroter S, Mueller J, van Heerwaarden R et al (2013) Return to work and clinical outcome after open wedge HTO. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Spahn G, Wittig R (2002) Primary stability of various implants in tibial opening wedge osteotomy: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Sci 7(6):683–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sterett WI, Steadman JR, Huang MJ et al (2010) Chondral resurfacing and high tibial osteotomy in the varus knee: survivorship analysis. Am J Sports Med 38(7):1420–1424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Trinh TQ, Harris JD, Siston RA et al (2013) Improved outcomes with combined autologous chondrocyte implantation and patellofemoral osteotomy versus isolated autologous chondrocyte implantation. Arthroscopy 29(3):566–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tunggal JA, Higgins GA, Waddell JP Complications of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop 34(2):255–261

  38. W-Dahl A, Robertsson O, Lidgren L (2010) Surgery for knee osteoarthritis in younger patients. Acta Orthop 81(2):161–164

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Willey M, Wolf BR, Kocaglu B et al (2010) Complications associated with realignment osteotomy of the knee performed simultaneously with additional reconstructive procedures. Iowa Orthop J 30:55–60

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wolcott M, Traub S, Efird C (2010) High tibial osteotomies in the young active patient. Int Orthop 34(2):161–166

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerrit Bode.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bode, G., Ogon, P., Pestka, J. et al. Clinical outcome and return to work following single-stage combined autologous chondrocyte implantation and high tibial osteotomy. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 689–696 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2547-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2547-z

Keywords

Navigation