Skip to main content
Log in

Fluoroscopy-guided retrograde core drilling and cancellous bone grafting in osteochondral defects of the talus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In undetached osteochondral lesions (OCL) of the talus both revitalisation of the subchondral necrosis and cartilage preservation are essential. For these cases, we assess the results of minimally invasive retrograde core drilling and cancellous bone grafting.

Methods

Forty-one osteochondral lesions of the talus (12x grade I, 22x grade II and 7x grade III according to the Pritsch classification, defect sizes 7–14 mm) in 38 patients (mean age 33.2 years) treated by fluoroscopy-guided retrograde core drilling and autologous cancellous bone grafting were evaluated by clinical scores and MRI. The mean follow-up was 29.0 (±13) months.

Results

The AOFAS score increased significantly from 47.3 (±15.3) to 80.8 (±18.6) points. Lesions with intact cartilage (grades I and II) had a tendency to superior results than grade III lesions (83.1 ± 17.3 vs. 69.4 ± 22.2 points, p = 0.07). First-line treatments and open distal tibial growth plates led to significantly better outcomes (each p < 0.05). Age, gender, BMI, time to follow-up, defect localisation or a traumatic origin did not influence the score results. On a visual analogue scale pain intensity reduced from 7.5 (±1.5) to 3.7 (±2.6) while subjective function increased from 4.6 (±2.0) to 8.2 (±2.3) (each p < 0.001). In MRI follow-ups, five of the 41 patients showed a complete bone remodelling. In two cases demarcation was detectable.

Conclusions

The technique reported is a highly effective therapeutic option in OCL of the talus with intact cartilage grades I and II. However, second-line treatments and grade III lesions with cracked cartilage surface can not be generally recommended for this procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zengerink M, Szerb I, Hangody L, Dopirak RM, Ferkel RD, van Dijk CN (2006) Current concepts: treatment of osteochondral ankle defects. Foot Ankle Clin 11:331–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Takao M, Ochi M, Naito K, Uchio Y, Kono T, Oae K (2003) Arthroscopic drilling for chondral, subchondral, and combined chondral-subchondral lesions of the talar dome. Arthroscopy 19:524–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Draper SD, Fallat LM (2000) Autogenous bone grafting for the treatment of talar dome lesions. J Foot Ankle Surg 39:15–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hangody L, Kish G, Modis L, Szerb I, Gaspar L, Dioszegi Z, Kendik Z (2001) Mosaicplasty for the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: two to seven year results in 36 patients. Foot Ankle Int 22:552–558

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Becher C, Thermann H (2005) Results of microfracture in the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the talus. Foot Ankle Int 26:583–589

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wagner H (1964) Surgical treatment of osteochondritis dissecans, a cause of arthritis deformans of the knee. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 50:335–352

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Conti SF, Taranow WS (1996) Transtalar retrograde drilling of medial osteochondral lesions of the talar dome. Operat Tech Orthop 6:226–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berndt AL, Harty M (1959) Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 41-A:988–1020

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pritsch M, Horoshovski H, Farine I (1986) Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:862–865

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15:349–353

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hunt SA, Sherman O (2003) Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with correlation of outcome scoring systems. Arthroscopy 19:360–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Canale ST, Belding RH (1980) Osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:97–102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Letts M, Davidson D, Ahmer A (2003) Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus in children. J Pediatr Orthop 23:617–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bruns J, Rosenbach B (1992) Osteochondrosis dissecans of the talus. Comparison of results of surgical treatment in adolescents and adults. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 112:23–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kono M, Takao M, Naito K, Uchio Y, Ochi M (2006) Retrograde drilling for osteochondral lesions of the talar dome. Am J Sports Med 34:1450–1456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kendoff D, Geerling J, Mahlke L, Citak M, Kfuri M Jr, Hufner T, Krettek C (2003) Navigated Iso-C(3D)-based drilling of a osteochondral lesion of the talus. Unfallchirurg 106:963–967

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenberger RE, Fink C, Bale RJ, El Attal R, Muhlbacher R, Hoser C (2006) Computer-assisted minimally invasive treatment of osteochondrosis dissecans of the talus. Oper Orthop Traumatol 18:300–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee CK, Mercurio C (1981) Operative treatment of osteochondritis dissecans in situ by retrograde drilling and cancellous bone graft: a preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 158:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  19. Taranow WS, Bisignani GA, Towers JD, Conti SF (1999) Retrograde drilling of osteochondral lesions of the medial talar dome. Foot Ankle Int 20:474–480

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Takao M, Innami K, Komatsu F, Matsushita T (2010) Retrograde cancellous bone plug transplantation for the treatment of advanced osteochondral lesions with large subchondral lesions of the ankle. Am J Sports Med 38:1653–1660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ettl V, Kenn W, Radke S, Kirschner S, Goerttler-Krauspe I, Vispo-Seara JL (2001) The role of MRI in therapy and follow-up after surgical treatment of osteochondrosis dissecans of the talus. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139:157–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Radke S, Vispo-Seara J, Walther M, Kenn W, Kirschner S, Ettl V, Eulert J (2004) Osteochondral lesions of the talus—indications for MRI with a contrast agent. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142:618–624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kumai T, Takakura Y, Higashiyama I, Tamai S (1999) Arthroscopic drilling for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1229–1235

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Anders.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anders, S., Lechler, P., Rackl, W. et al. Fluoroscopy-guided retrograde core drilling and cancellous bone grafting in osteochondral defects of the talus. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 36, 1635–1640 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1530-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1530-9

Keywords

Navigation