Abstract
The introduction of serum prostate-specific antigen to the prostate cancer screening algorithm has led to an increase in prostate cancer diagnosis as well as a migration toward lower-stage cancer at the time of diagnosis. This stage migration has coincided with changes in treatment options; these include active surveillance, new therapies, and advances in surgical techniques. Use of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) as a surgical technique has seen a significant increase over the past several years: the number of patients undergoing RARP has risen from 1% to 40% of all prostatectomies from 2001–2006 to as many as 80% in 2010. The robotic interface provides a 3D magnified view of the surgical field, intuitive instrument manipulation, motion scaling, tremor filtration, and excellent dexterity and range of motion. However, in some cases, the lack of tactile (haptic) feedback may limit the surgeon’s decision making ability in assessing malignant involvement of the neurovascular bundles. Pre-operative planning relies on nomograms based on limited clinical and prostate biopsy information. The surgical decision to spare or resect the neurovascular bundles is based on clinical information which is not spatially or anatomically based. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may provide spatially localized information to fill this void and aid surgical planning, particularly for robotic surgeons. In this review, we discuss the potential role of pre-operative MRI in surgical planning for radical prostatectomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- PSA:
-
Prostate-specific antigen
- DRE:
-
Digital rectal exam
- RP:
-
Radical prostatectomy
- RRP:
-
Radical retropubic prostatectomy
- RARP:
-
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
- eMRI:
-
Endorectal coil MRI
- DCE MRI:
-
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
- MRSI:
-
MR spectroscopic imaging
- ADC:
-
Apparent diffusion coefficient
- DWI:
-
Diffusion weighted imaging
- ROC:
-
Receiver operating characteristic
- AUC:
-
Area under the curve
- ECE:
-
Extracapsular extension
- SVI:
-
Seminal vesicle invasion
- NVB:
-
Neurovascular bundle
- MUL:
-
Mid-urethral length
- PSM:
-
Positive surgical margin
- AA:
-
African-American
- GU:
-
Genitourinary
References
Jemal A, et al. (2009) Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59(4):225–249
D’Amico AV, et al. (1998) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280(11):969–974
Cooperberg MR, et al. (2004) The changing face of low-risk prostate cancer: trends in clinical presentation and primary management. J Clin Oncol 22(11):2141–2149
Harlan SR, et al. (2003) Time trends and characteristics of men choosing watchful waiting for initial treatment of localized prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE. J Urol 170(5):1804–1807
Abouassaly R, Lane BR, Jones JS (2008) Staging saturation biopsy in patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance protocol. Urology 71(4):573–577
Kattan MW, et al. (1998) A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 90(10):766–771
Partin AW, et al. (1997) Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update. JAMA 277(18):1445–1451
Blute ML, et al. (2000) Validation of Partin tables for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 164(5):1591–1595
Partin AW, et al. (2001) Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium. Urology 58(6):843–848
Moreira DM, et al. (2009) Validation of a nomogram to predict disease progression following salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database. BJU Int 104(10):1452–1456
Ross PL, Scardino PT, Kattan MW (2001) A catalog of prostate cancer nomograms. J Urol 165(5):1562–1568
Joseph JV, et al. (2006) Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach. J Urol 175(3 Pt 1):945–950 (discussion 951)
Menon M, et al. (2003) Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy: a single-team experience of 100 cases. J Endourol 17(9):785–790
Patel VR, et al. (2005) Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting—the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 174(1):269–272
Stanford JL, et al. (2000) Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JAMA 283(3):354–360
Donnellan SM, et al. (1997) Prospective assessment of incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: objective and subjective analysis. Urology 49(2):225–230
Walsh PC, Donker PJ (2002) Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. 1982. J Urol 167(2 Pt 2):1005–1010
Graefen M, Walz J, Huland H (2006) Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 49(1):38–48
Michl U, et al. (2003) Functional results of various surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy. Urologe A 42(9):1196–1202
Gore JL, et al. (2010) Correlates of bother following treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 184(4):1309–1315
Cropper C (2005) The robot is in—and ready to operate. Business Week. pp 110–112
Lee DI (2009) Robotic prostatectomy: what we have learned and where we are going. Yonsei Med J 50(2):177–181
Coelho RF, et al. (2009) Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes. BJU Int 104(10):1428–1435
Coelho RF, et al. (2010) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol 24(12):2003–2015
Miller J, et al. (2007) Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy. J Urol 178(3 Pt 1):854–858 (discussion 859)
Smith JA Jr, et al. (2007) A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 178(6):2385–2389 (discussion 2389–2390)
Bianco FJJr, et al. (2005) Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters. J Urol 173(6):2099–2103
Begg CB, et al. (2002) Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med 346(15):1138–1144
Okihara K, et al. (2002) Role of systematic ultrasound-guided staging biopsies in predicting extraprostatic extension and seminal vesicle invasion in men with prostate cancer. J Clin Ultrasound 30(3):123–131
Terris MK, et al. (1993) Efficacy of transrectal ultrasound-guided seminal vesicle biopsies in the detection of seminal vesicle invasion by prostate cancer. J Urol 149(5):1035–1039
Schnall MD, et al. (1991) Prostate cancer: local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging. Radiology 178(3):797–802
Schnall MD, et al. (1989) Prostate: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. Radiology 172(2):570–574
Fuchsjager M, et al. (2009) The role of MRI and MRSI in diagnosis, treatment selection, and post-treatment follow-up for prostate cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 7(3):193–202
Nagarajan R, et al. (2010) Correlation of endorectal 2D JPRESS findings with pathological Gleason scores in prostate cancer patients. NMR Biomed 23(3):257–261
Kurhanewicz J, et al. (1993) Citrate alterations in primary and metastatic human prostatic adenocarcinomas: 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy and biochemical study. Magn Reson Med 29(2):149–157
Shukla-Dave A, et al. (2007) Detection of prostate cancer with MR spectroscopic imaging: an expanded paradigm incorporating polyamines. Radiology 245(2):499–506
Zakian KL, et al. (2003) Transition zone prostate cancer: metabolic characteristics at 1H MR spectroscopic imaging—initial results. Radiology 229(1):241–247
Scheidler J, et al. (1999) Prostate cancer: localization with three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging–clinicopathologic study. Radiology 213(2):473–480
Wefer AE, et al. (2000) Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology. J Urol 164(2):400–404
Tan CH, Wang J, Kundra V (2011) Diffusion weighted imaging in prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 21:593–603
Afnan J, Tempany CM (2010) Update on prostate imaging. Urol Clin North Am 37(1):23–25
Provenzale JM, et al. (1999) Use of MR exponential diffusion-weighted images to eradicate T2 “shine-through” effect. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172(2):537–539
Gibbs P, et al. (2001) Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diffusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate. Magn Reson Med 46(6):1054–1058
Hosseinzadeh K, Schwarz SD (2004) Endorectal diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging 20(4):654–661
Issa B (2002) In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo-planar imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 16(2):196–200
Mazaheri Y, et al. (2008) Prostate cancer: identification with combined diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 3D 1H MR spectroscopic imaging—correlation with pathologic findings. Radiology 246(2):480–488
Haider MA, et al. (2007) Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(2):323–328
Reinsberg SA, et al. (2007) Combined use of diffusion-weighted MRI and 1H MR spectroscopy to increase accuracy in prostate cancer detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(1):91–98
Futterer JJ, et al. (2006) Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 241(2):449–458
Noworolski SM, et al. (2005) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in normal and abnormal prostate tissues as defined by biopsy, MRI, and 3D MRSI. Magn Reson Med 53(2):249–255
Engelbrecht MR, et al. (2003) Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 229(1):248–254
Tofts PS, et al. (1999) Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 10(3):223–232
Hittmair K, et al. (1994) Method for the quantitative assessment of contrast agent uptake in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 31(5):567–571
Mullerad M, et al. (2005) Comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging, guided prostate biopsy and digital rectal examination in the preoperative anatomical localization of prostate cancer. J Urol 174(6):2158–2163
Rifkin MD, et al. (1990) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer. Results of a multi-institutional cooperative trial. N Engl J Med 323(10):621–626
Villers A, et al. (2006) Dynamic contrast enhanced, pelvic phased array magnetic resonance imaging of localized prostate cancer for predicting tumor volume: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. J Urol 176(6 Pt 1):2432–2437
Kim CK, Park BK, Kim B (2006) Localization of prostate cancer using 3T MRI: comparison of T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30(1):7–11
Bonekamp D, Macura KJ (2008) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the prostate. Top Magn Reson Imaging 19(6):273–284
Gurses B, et al. (2011) Diagnostic utility of DTI in prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 79:172–176
Moseley ME, et al. (1990) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of anisotropic water diffusion in cat central nervous system. Radiology 176(2):439–445
Filler A (2009) Magnetic resonance neurography and diffusion tensor imaging: origins, history, and clinical impact of the first 50, 000 cases with an assessment of efficacy and utility in a prospective 5000-patient study group. Neurosurgery 65(4 Suppl):A29–A43
Sinha S, Sinha U (2004) In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of the human prostate. Magn Reson Med 52(3):530–537
Verma S et al. (2011) Prostate cancer: diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging for detection of extracapsular invasion and differentiation of malignant versus benign tissue. Abdominal Imaging Course. Carlsbad, CA. p 57
Kozlowski P, et al. (2010) Combined prostate diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI at 3T—quantitative correlation with biopsy. Magn Reson Imaging 28(5):621–628
Manenti G, et al. (2007) Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer. Invest Radiol 42(6):412–419
Reischauer C et al. (2010) High-resolution diffusion tensor imaging of prostate cancer using a reduced FOV technique. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.038
Akin O, et al. (2010) Interactive dedicated training curriculum improves accuracy in the interpretation of MR imaging of prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 20(4):995–1002
Mullerad M, et al. (2004) Prostate cancer: detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging. Radiology 232(1):140–146
Yu KK, et al. (1999) Prostate cancer: prediction of extracapsular extension with endorectal MR imaging and three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 213(2):481–488
Wang L, et al. (2006) Prediction of organ-confined prostate cancer: incremental value of MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging to staging nomograms. Radiology 238(2):597–603
Bloch BN, et al. (2007) Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging—initial results. Radiology 245(1):176–185
Cornud F, et al. (2002) Extraprostatic spread of clinically localized prostate cancer: factors predictive of pT3 tumor and of positive endorectal MR imaging examination results. Radiology 224(1):203–210
Heijmink SW, et al. (2007) Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T—comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance. Radiology 244(1):184–195
Wang L, et al. (2007) Prediction of seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: incremental value of adding endorectal MR imaging to the Kattan nomogram. Radiology 242(1):182–188
Kim CK, et al. (2008) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the evaluation of seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging 28(4):963–969
Ren J, et al. (2009) Seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: prediction with combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol 19(10):2481–2486
Hricak H, et al. (2004) The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 100(12):2655–2663
McClure T et al. (2011) Utility of MR imaging for determination to preserve or resect the neurovascular bundle for robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Radiology, in press
Brown JA, et al. (2009) Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate. Urol Oncol 27(2):174–179
Paparel P, et al. (2009) Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: association with urethral length and urethral fibrosis measured by preoperative and postoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Urol 55(3):629–637
Coakley FV, et al. (2002) Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 168(3):1032–1035
Mason BM, et al. (2010) The role of preoperative endo-rectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in predicting surgical difficulty for robotic prostatectomy. Urology 76(5):1130–1135
Hong SK, et al. (2009) Effect of bony pelvic dimensions measured by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on performing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int 104(5):664–668
von Bodman C, et al. (2010) Ethnic variation in pelvimetric measures and its impact on positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy. Urology 76(5):1092–1096
Coakley FV, et al. (2002) Blood loss during radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship to morphologic features on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Urology 59(6):884–888
Masterson TA, Touijer K (2008) The role of endorectal coil MRI in preoperative staging and decision-making for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. MAGMA 21(6):371–377
Tamada T, et al. (2008) Prostate cancer: relationships between postbiopsy hemorrhage and tumor detectability at MR diagnosis. Radiology 248(2):531–539
Rosenkrantz AB, et al. (2010) Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 31(6):1387–1394
Padhani AR, et al. (2000) Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation with morphology and tumour stage, histological grade and PSA. Clin Radiol 55(2):99–109
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tan, N., Margolis, D.J.A., McClure, T.D. et al. Radical prostatectomy: value of prostate MRI in surgical planning. Abdom Imaging 37, 664–674 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9805-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9805-y