References
RC Smith J Levine NC Dalrymple et al. (1999) ArticleTitle Acute flank pain: a modern approach to diagnosis and management. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 20 108–135 Occurrence Handle10222519 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0887-2171(99)90042-2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3jvFShtw%3D%3D
L Dalla Palma R Pozzi-Mucelli F Stacul (2001) ArticleTitlePresent-day imaging of patients with renal colic. Eur Radiol 11 4–17 Occurrence Handle11194915 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003300000589 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ptFertA%3D%3D
M Patlas A Farkas D Fisher et al. (2001) ArticleTitle Ultrasound vs CT for the detection of ureteric stones in patients with renal colic. Br J Radiol 74 901–904 Occurrence Handle11675305 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrmvVWnug%3D%3D
O Catalano A Nunziata F Altei A Siani (2002) ArticleTitle Suspected ureteral colic: primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography. AJR 178 379–387 Occurrence Handle11804898
T Ripollés M Agramunt J Errando et al. (2003) ArticleTitleSuspected ureteral colic: plain film and sonography vs unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study in 66 patients. Eur Radiol . . Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00330-003-1861-4
KA Fowler JA Locken JH Duchesne MR Williamson (2002) ArticleTitle US for detecting renal calculi with nonenhanced CT as a reference standard. Radiology 222 109–113 Occurrence Handle11756713 Occurrence Handle10.1148/radiol.2221010453
KC Saw JS McAteer AG Monga et al. (2000) ArticleTitle Helical CT of urinary calculi: effect of stone composition, stone size and scan collimation. AJR 175 329–332 Occurrence Handle10915668 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvgvVSguw%3D%3D
O Catalano A Nunziata F Sandomenico A Siani (2002) ArticleTitle Acute flank pain: comparison of unenhanced helical CT and ultrasonography in detecting causes other than ureterolithiasis. Emerg Radiol 9 146–154 Occurrence Handle15290574
G Grisi F Stacul R Cuttin et al. (2000) ArticleTitleCost analysis of different protocols for imaging a patient with acute flank pain. Eur Radiol 10 1620–1627 Occurrence Handle11044936 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003300000549 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crgtVOhug%3D%3D
D Tack S Sourtzis I Delpierre et al. (2003) ArticleTitle Low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic. AJR 180 305–311 Occurrence Handle12540420
DM Coll MJ Varanelli RC Smith (2002) ArticleTitle Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT. AJR 178 101–103 Occurrence Handle11756098
I Boulay P Holtz WD Foley et al. (1999) ArticleTitle Ureteral calculi: diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients. AJR 172 1485–1490 Occurrence Handle10350277 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3nslOrsg%3D%3D
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ripollés, T., Errando, J., Agramunt, M. et al. Ureteral colic: US versus CT . Abdom Imaging 29, 263–266 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-003-0098-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-003-0098-7