Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of different approaches for comparative genetic analysis using microarray hybridization

  • Methods
  • Published:
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A robust analysis of comparative genomic microarray data is critical for meaningful genomic comparison studies. In this paper, we compare our method (implemented in a new software tool, GENCOM, freely available at http://www.ifr.ac.uk/safety/gencom) with three commonly used analysis methods: GACK (freely available at http://falkow.stanford.edu), an empirical cut-off value of twofold difference between the fluorescence intensities after LOWESS normalization or after AVERAGE normalization in which the fluorescence intensity is divided by the average fluorescence intensity of the entire data set. Each method was tested using data sets from real experiments with prior knowledge of conserved and divergent genes. GENCOM and GACK were superior when a high proportion of genes were divergent. GENCOM was the most suitable method for the data set in which the relationship between the fluorescence intensities was not linear. GENCOM has proved robust in an analysis of all the data sets tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson SG, Dehio C (2000) Rickettsia prowazekii and Bartonella henselae: differences in the intracellular life styles revisited. Int J Med Microbiol 290:135–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon DJ, Alm RA, Hu L, Hickey TE, Ewing CP, Batchelor RA, Trust TJ, Guerry P (2002) DNA sequence and mutational analyses of the pVir plasmid of Campylobacter jejuni 81–176. Infect Immun 70:6242–6250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Behr MA, Wilson MA, Gill WP, Salamon H, Schoolnik GK, Rane S, Small PM (1999) Comparative genomics of BCG vaccines by whole-genome DNA microarray. Science 284:1520–1523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Call DR, Kang MS, Daniels J, Besser TE (2006) Assessing genetic diversity in plasmids from Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica using a mixed-plasmid microarray. J Appl Microbiol 100:15–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan K, Baker S, Kim CC, Detweiler CS, Dougan G, Falkow S (2003) Genomic comparison of Salmonella enterica serovars and Salmonella bongori by use of an S. enterica serovar typhimurium DNA microarray. J Bacteriol 185:553–563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland W (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 74:829–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagkessamanskaia A, Moscoso M, Henard V, Guiral S, Overweg K, Reuter M, Martin B, Wells JM, Claverys J (2004) Interconnection of competence, stress and CiaR regulons in Streptococcus pneumoniae: competence triggers stationary phase autolysis of ciaR mutant cells. Mol Microbiol 51:1071–1086

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Y, Glasner JD, Blattner FR, Triplett EW (2001) Genomic interspecies microarray hybridization: rapid discovery of three thousand genes in the maize endophyte, Klebsiella pneumoniae 342, by microarray hybridization with Escherichia coli K-12 open reading frames. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1911–1921

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann RD, Alland D, Eisen JA, Carpenter L, White O, Peterson J, DeBoy R, Dodson R, Gwinn M, Haft D, Hickey E, Kolonay JF, Nelson WC, Umayam LA, Ermolaeva M, Salzberg SL, Delcher A, Utterback T, Weidman J, Khouri H, Gill J, Mikula A, Bishai W, Jacobs WR Jr, Venter JC, Fraser CM (2002) Whole-genome comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical and laboratory strains. J Bacteriol 184:5479–5490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudriault S, Duchaud E, Lanois A, Canoy AS, Bourot S, Derose R, Kunst F, Boemare N, Givaudan A (2006) Whole-genome comparison between Photorhabdus strains to identify genomic regions involved in the specificity of nematode interaction. J Bacteriol 188:809–814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield GW, Baldi P (2002) DNA microarrays and gene expression: from experiments to data analysis and modeling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 53–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel DA, Salama N, Krishna U, Rieger UM, Atherton JC, Falkow S, Peek RM Jr (2001) Helicobacter pylori genetic diversity within the gastric niche of a single human host. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:14625–14630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova N, Sorokin A, Anderson I, Galleron N, Candelon B, Kapatral V, Bhattacharyya A, Reznik G, Mikhailova N, Lapidus A, Chu L, Mazur M, Goltsman E, Larsen N, D’Souza M, Walunas T, Grechkin Y, Pusch G, Haselkorn R, Fonstein M, Ehrlich SD, Overbeek R, Kyrpides N (2003) Genome sequence of Bacillus cereus and comparative analysis with Bacillus anthracis. Nature 423:87–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim CC, Joyce EA, Chan K, Falkow S (2002) Improved analytical methods for microarray-based genome-composition analysis. Genome Biol 3:RESEARCH0065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luu P, Yang YH, Dudoit S, Speed TP (2001) Normalization of cDNA microarray data. SPIE BIOS

  • Mira A, Klasson L, Andersson SG (2002) Microbial genome evolution: sources of variability. Curr Opin Microbiol 5:506–512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray AE, Lies D, Li G, Nealson K, Zhou J, Tiedje JM (2001) DNA/DNA hybridization to microarrays reveals gene-specific differences between closely related microbial genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:9853–9858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nuijten PJ, Bleumink-Pluym NM, Gaastra W, van der Zeijst BA (1989) Flagellin expression in Campylobacter jejuni is regulated at the transcriptional level. Infect Immun 57:1084–1088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhill J, Sebaihia M, Preston A, Murphy LD, Thomson N, Harris DE, Holden MT, Churcher CM, Bentley SD, Mungall KL, Cerdeno-Tarraga AM, Temple L, James K, Harris B, Quail MA, Achtman M, Atkin R, Baker S, Basham D, Bason N, Cherevach I, Chillingworth T, Collins M, Cronin A, Davis P, Doggett J, Feltwell T, Goble A, Hamlin N, Hauser H, Holroyd S, Jagels K, Leather S, Moule S, Norberczak H, O’Neil S, Ormond D, Price C, Rabbinowitsch E, Rutter S, Sanders M, Saunders D, Seeger K, Sharp S, Simmonds M, Skelton J, Squares R, Squares S, Stevens K, Unwin L, Whitehead S, Barrell BG, Maskell DJ (2003) Comparative analysis of the genome sequences of Bordetella pertussis, Bordetella parapertussis and Bordetella bronchiseptica. Nat Genet 35:32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson BM, Pin C, Wright J, I’Anson K, Humphrey T, Wells JM (2003) Comparative genome analysis of Campylobacter jejuni using whole genome DNA microarrays. FEBS Lett 554:224–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin A, Bonacorsi S, Carbonnelle E, Talibi D, Dessen P, Nassif X, Tinsley C (2002) Comparative genomics identifies the genetic islands that distinguish Neisseria meningitidis, the agent of cerebrospinal meningitis, from other Neisseria species. Infect Immun 70:7063–7072

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porwollik S, Wong RM, McClelland M (2002) Evolutionary genomics of Salmonella: gene acquisitions revealed by microarray analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:8956–8961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quackenbush J (2002) Microarray data normalization and transformation. Nat Genet 32 Suppl:496–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riehle MM, Bennett AF, Long AD (2001) Genetic architecture of thermal adaptation in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:525–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shalon D, Smith SJ, Brown PO (1996) A DNA microarray system for analyzing complex DNA samples using two-color fluorescent probe hybridization. Genome Res 6:639–645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swiderek H, Claus H, Frosch M, Vogel U (2005) Evaluation of custom-made DNA microarrays for multilocus sequence typing of Neisseria meningitidis. Int J Med Microbiol 295:39–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taboada EN, Acedillo RR, Luebbert CC, Findlay WA, Nash JH (2005) A new approach for the analysis of bacterial microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization: insights from an empirical study. BMC Genomics 6:78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tettelin H, Masignani V, Cieslewicz MJ, Eisen JA, Peterson S, Wessels MR, Paulsen IT, Nelson KE, Margarit I, Read TD, Madoff LC, Wolf AM, Beanan MJ, Brinkac LM, Daugherty SC, DeBoy RT, Durkin AS, Kolonay JF, Madupu R, Lewis MR, Radune D, Fedorova NB, Scanlan D, Khouri H, Mulligan S, Carty HA, Cline RT, Van Aken SE, Gill J, Scarselli M, Mora M, Iacobini ET, Brettoni C, Galli G, Mariani M, Vegni F, Maione D, Rinaudo D, Rappuoli R, Telford JL, Kasper DL, Grandi G, Fraser CM (2002) Complete genome sequence and comparative genomic analysis of an emerging human pathogen, serotype V Streptococcus agalactiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:12391–12396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge support from the BBSRC core strategic grants 434.1213A and 4311209A. JMW also wishes to acknowledge support from EC project TCS-TARGETS QLK2-CT-2000-00543.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmen Pin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pin, C., Reuter, M., Pearson, B. et al. Comparison of different approaches for comparative genetic analysis using microarray hybridization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72, 852–859 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0536-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0536-x

Keywords

Navigation