Abstract
A robust analysis of comparative genomic microarray data is critical for meaningful genomic comparison studies. In this paper, we compare our method (implemented in a new software tool, GENCOM, freely available at http://www.ifr.ac.uk/safety/gencom) with three commonly used analysis methods: GACK (freely available at http://falkow.stanford.edu), an empirical cut-off value of twofold difference between the fluorescence intensities after LOWESS normalization or after AVERAGE normalization in which the fluorescence intensity is divided by the average fluorescence intensity of the entire data set. Each method was tested using data sets from real experiments with prior knowledge of conserved and divergent genes. GENCOM and GACK were superior when a high proportion of genes were divergent. GENCOM was the most suitable method for the data set in which the relationship between the fluorescence intensities was not linear. GENCOM has proved robust in an analysis of all the data sets tested.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson SG, Dehio C (2000) Rickettsia prowazekii and Bartonella henselae: differences in the intracellular life styles revisited. Int J Med Microbiol 290:135–141
Bacon DJ, Alm RA, Hu L, Hickey TE, Ewing CP, Batchelor RA, Trust TJ, Guerry P (2002) DNA sequence and mutational analyses of the pVir plasmid of Campylobacter jejuni 81–176. Infect Immun 70:6242–6250
Behr MA, Wilson MA, Gill WP, Salamon H, Schoolnik GK, Rane S, Small PM (1999) Comparative genomics of BCG vaccines by whole-genome DNA microarray. Science 284:1520–1523
Call DR, Kang MS, Daniels J, Besser TE (2006) Assessing genetic diversity in plasmids from Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica using a mixed-plasmid microarray. J Appl Microbiol 100:15–28
Chan K, Baker S, Kim CC, Detweiler CS, Dougan G, Falkow S (2003) Genomic comparison of Salmonella enterica serovars and Salmonella bongori by use of an S. enterica serovar typhimurium DNA microarray. J Bacteriol 185:553–563
Cleveland W (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 74:829–836
Dagkessamanskaia A, Moscoso M, Henard V, Guiral S, Overweg K, Reuter M, Martin B, Wells JM, Claverys J (2004) Interconnection of competence, stress and CiaR regulons in Streptococcus pneumoniae: competence triggers stationary phase autolysis of ciaR mutant cells. Mol Microbiol 51:1071–1086
Dong Y, Glasner JD, Blattner FR, Triplett EW (2001) Genomic interspecies microarray hybridization: rapid discovery of three thousand genes in the maize endophyte, Klebsiella pneumoniae 342, by microarray hybridization with Escherichia coli K-12 open reading frames. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1911–1921
Fleischmann RD, Alland D, Eisen JA, Carpenter L, White O, Peterson J, DeBoy R, Dodson R, Gwinn M, Haft D, Hickey E, Kolonay JF, Nelson WC, Umayam LA, Ermolaeva M, Salzberg SL, Delcher A, Utterback T, Weidman J, Khouri H, Gill J, Mikula A, Bishai W, Jacobs WR Jr, Venter JC, Fraser CM (2002) Whole-genome comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical and laboratory strains. J Bacteriol 184:5479–5490
Gaudriault S, Duchaud E, Lanois A, Canoy AS, Bourot S, Derose R, Kunst F, Boemare N, Givaudan A (2006) Whole-genome comparison between Photorhabdus strains to identify genomic regions involved in the specificity of nematode interaction. J Bacteriol 188:809–814
Hatfield GW, Baldi P (2002) DNA microarrays and gene expression: from experiments to data analysis and modeling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 53–72
Israel DA, Salama N, Krishna U, Rieger UM, Atherton JC, Falkow S, Peek RM Jr (2001) Helicobacter pylori genetic diversity within the gastric niche of a single human host. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:14625–14630
Ivanova N, Sorokin A, Anderson I, Galleron N, Candelon B, Kapatral V, Bhattacharyya A, Reznik G, Mikhailova N, Lapidus A, Chu L, Mazur M, Goltsman E, Larsen N, D’Souza M, Walunas T, Grechkin Y, Pusch G, Haselkorn R, Fonstein M, Ehrlich SD, Overbeek R, Kyrpides N (2003) Genome sequence of Bacillus cereus and comparative analysis with Bacillus anthracis. Nature 423:87–91
Kim CC, Joyce EA, Chan K, Falkow S (2002) Improved analytical methods for microarray-based genome-composition analysis. Genome Biol 3:RESEARCH0065
Luu P, Yang YH, Dudoit S, Speed TP (2001) Normalization of cDNA microarray data. SPIE BIOS
Mira A, Klasson L, Andersson SG (2002) Microbial genome evolution: sources of variability. Curr Opin Microbiol 5:506–512
Murray AE, Lies D, Li G, Nealson K, Zhou J, Tiedje JM (2001) DNA/DNA hybridization to microarrays reveals gene-specific differences between closely related microbial genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:9853–9858
Nuijten PJ, Bleumink-Pluym NM, Gaastra W, van der Zeijst BA (1989) Flagellin expression in Campylobacter jejuni is regulated at the transcriptional level. Infect Immun 57:1084–1088
Parkhill J, Sebaihia M, Preston A, Murphy LD, Thomson N, Harris DE, Holden MT, Churcher CM, Bentley SD, Mungall KL, Cerdeno-Tarraga AM, Temple L, James K, Harris B, Quail MA, Achtman M, Atkin R, Baker S, Basham D, Bason N, Cherevach I, Chillingworth T, Collins M, Cronin A, Davis P, Doggett J, Feltwell T, Goble A, Hamlin N, Hauser H, Holroyd S, Jagels K, Leather S, Moule S, Norberczak H, O’Neil S, Ormond D, Price C, Rabbinowitsch E, Rutter S, Sanders M, Saunders D, Seeger K, Sharp S, Simmonds M, Skelton J, Squares R, Squares S, Stevens K, Unwin L, Whitehead S, Barrell BG, Maskell DJ (2003) Comparative analysis of the genome sequences of Bordetella pertussis, Bordetella parapertussis and Bordetella bronchiseptica. Nat Genet 35:32–40
Pearson BM, Pin C, Wright J, I’Anson K, Humphrey T, Wells JM (2003) Comparative genome analysis of Campylobacter jejuni using whole genome DNA microarrays. FEBS Lett 554:224–230
Perrin A, Bonacorsi S, Carbonnelle E, Talibi D, Dessen P, Nassif X, Tinsley C (2002) Comparative genomics identifies the genetic islands that distinguish Neisseria meningitidis, the agent of cerebrospinal meningitis, from other Neisseria species. Infect Immun 70:7063–7072
Porwollik S, Wong RM, McClelland M (2002) Evolutionary genomics of Salmonella: gene acquisitions revealed by microarray analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:8956–8961
Quackenbush J (2002) Microarray data normalization and transformation. Nat Genet 32 Suppl:496–501
Riehle MM, Bennett AF, Long AD (2001) Genetic architecture of thermal adaptation in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:525–530
Shalon D, Smith SJ, Brown PO (1996) A DNA microarray system for analyzing complex DNA samples using two-color fluorescent probe hybridization. Genome Res 6:639–645
Swiderek H, Claus H, Frosch M, Vogel U (2005) Evaluation of custom-made DNA microarrays for multilocus sequence typing of Neisseria meningitidis. Int J Med Microbiol 295:39–45
Taboada EN, Acedillo RR, Luebbert CC, Findlay WA, Nash JH (2005) A new approach for the analysis of bacterial microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization: insights from an empirical study. BMC Genomics 6:78
Tettelin H, Masignani V, Cieslewicz MJ, Eisen JA, Peterson S, Wessels MR, Paulsen IT, Nelson KE, Margarit I, Read TD, Madoff LC, Wolf AM, Beanan MJ, Brinkac LM, Daugherty SC, DeBoy RT, Durkin AS, Kolonay JF, Madupu R, Lewis MR, Radune D, Fedorova NB, Scanlan D, Khouri H, Mulligan S, Carty HA, Cline RT, Van Aken SE, Gill J, Scarselli M, Mora M, Iacobini ET, Brettoni C, Galli G, Mariani M, Vegni F, Maione D, Rinaudo D, Rappuoli R, Telford JL, Kasper DL, Grandi G, Fraser CM (2002) Complete genome sequence and comparative genomic analysis of an emerging human pathogen, serotype V Streptococcus agalactiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:12391–12396
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge support from the BBSRC core strategic grants 434.1213A and 4311209A. JMW also wishes to acknowledge support from EC project TCS-TARGETS QLK2-CT-2000-00543.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pin, C., Reuter, M., Pearson, B. et al. Comparison of different approaches for comparative genetic analysis using microarray hybridization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72, 852–859 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0536-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0536-x