Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasound features of intussusception predicting outcome of air enema

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective. To examine features identified on US which predict success or failure of air-enema reduction of intussusception. Materials and methods. A retrospective study of 117 consecutive episodes of intussusception, presenting for US over a 6-year period. The specific features examined were: free fluid within the peritoneum, small-bowel obstruction, colonic wall thickness, and fluid trapped between the colon and the intussusceptum. Results. The overall reduction rate, irrespective of US features, over the 6-year period was 72 %. Reduction rates were significantly higher with the absence of free fluid, trapped fluid, or small-bowel obstruction (93 %). The presence of trapped fluid predicted an unfavourable outcome, with a significantly lower success rate (25 %). Colonic wall thickness did not predict outcome; in successful reductions, mean wall thickness was 7.2 mm and in failed reductions 7.6 mm. Conclusions. Where free fluid, small-bowel obstruction, and trapped fluid are absent, almost 100 % success with air-enema reduction should be achievable. Where trapped fluid is present, air enema should be performed cautiously to avoid perforation caused by overvigorous attempts at pneumatic reduction of an incarcerated intussusception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 5 August 1998 Accepted: 15 February 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Britton, I., Wilkinson, A. Ultrasound features of intussusception predicting outcome of air enema. Pediatric Radiology 29, 705–710 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002470050679

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002470050679

Keywords

Navigation