Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A framework for the radiologic diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias and syndromes as revealed by molecular genetics

  • Musculoskeletal imaging
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article simplifies the radiologic diagnosis of skeletal dysplasia by first presenting an ordered approach for analysis of standard radiographs done for skeletal dysplasias. With that foundation, a more detailed discussion of three separate families of skeletal disorders follows. Similarities among dysplasia group members are discussed to provide a certain connectedness among dysplasias. The paper also elucidates the scientific basis behind the radiographic findings so that previously purely descriptive terms have the weight of understanding behind them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Warman ML, Cormier-Daire V, Hall C et al (2011) Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders: 2010 revision. Am J Med Genet A 155A:943–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lachman RS (2007) Taybi and Lachman's radiology of syndromes, metabolic disorders and skeletal dysplasias, 5th edn. Mosby, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dwek JR, Lachman R (2019) Skeletal dysplasias and selected chromosomal disorders. In: Coley BD (ed) Caffey's pediatric diagnostic imaging. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1258–1260

    Google Scholar 

  4. Offiah AC, Hall CM (2003) Radiological diagnosis of the constitutional disorders of bone. As easy as A, B, C? Pediatr Radiol 33:153–161

  5. National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. Library of Medicine (2019) Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim. Accessed 9 Sept 2019

  6. Bonaventure J, Rousseau F, Legeai-Mallet L et al (1996) Common mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR 3) gene account for achondroplasia, hypochondroplasia, and thanatophoric dwarfism. Am J Med Genet 63:148–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ornitz DM, Legeai-Mallet L (2016) Achondroplasia: development, pathogenesis, and therapy. Dev Dyn 246:291–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vajo Z, Francomano CA, Wilkin DJ (2000) The molecular and genetic basis of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 disorders: the achondroplasia family of skeletal dysplasias, Muenke craniosynostosis, and Crouzon syndrome with acanthosis nigricans. Endocr Rev 21:23–39

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sargar KM, Singh AK, Kao SC (2017) Imaging of skeletal disorders caused by fibroblast growth factor receptor gene mutations. Radiographics 37:1813–1830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Superti-Furga A, Hastbacka J, Wilcox WR et al (1996) Achondrogenesis type IB is caused by mutations in the diastrophic dysplasia sulphate transporter gene. Nat Genet 12:100–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Superti-Furga A, Hastbacka J, Rossi A et al (1996) A family of chondrodysplasias caused by mutations in the diastrophic dysplasia sulfate transporter gene and associated with impaired sulfation of proteoglycans. Ann N Y Acad Sci 785:195–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spranger JW, Brill PW, Poznanski A (2002) Bone dysplasias: an atlas of genetic disorders of skeletal development, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Skorzewska A, Grzymislawska M, Bruska M et al (2013) Ossification of the vertebral column in human foetuses: histological and computed tomography studies. Folia Morphol 72:230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Taybi H (1963) Diastrophic dwarfism. Radiology 80:1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson DW, Chrispin AR, Carter CO (1969) Diastrophic dwarfism. Arch Dis Child 44:48–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sillence D, Worthington S, Dixon J et al (1997) Atelosteogenesis syndromes: a review, with comments on their pathogenesis. Pediatr Radiol 27:388–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar R, Guinto FC Jr, Madewell JE et al (1988) The vertebral body: radiographic configurations in various congenital and acquired disorders. Radiographics 8:455–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Labrom RD (2007) Growth and maturation of the spine from birth to adolescence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:3–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Woo TD, Tony G, Charran A et al (2018) Radiographic morphology of normal ring apophyses in the immature cervical spine. Skelet Radiol 47:1221–1228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerry R. Dwek.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dwek, J.R. A framework for the radiologic diagnosis of skeletal dysplasias and syndromes as revealed by molecular genetics. Pediatr Radiol 49, 1576–1586 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04545-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04545-8

Keywords

Navigation