Skip to main content
Log in

How effective is ureteroscopy in the treatment of pediatric stone disease?

  • SYMPOSIUM PAPER
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pediatric ureteroscopy has been increasingly used to manage both ureteral and renal stones. Unfortunately, there are no current standardized recommendations when treating pediatric stone disease so the modality chosen is left to the treating surgeon. A review of the current literature on pediatric ureteroscopy was used to compile this article. For the purposes of this review, the majority of series include stones ≤1 cm. Ureteroscopy is considered to be first-line therapy in treating mid- to distal ureteral stones and is rapidly evolving as an acceptable first-line therapy for renal stones as well. Limitations do exist and include stone composition, location, size, as well as the unique anatomic challenges faced by pediatric urologists in terms of anomalous kidneys and/or reconstructed urinary tracts. In conclusion, ureteroscopy can be considered first-line therapy for mid- or distal ureteral stones, however, it shares a similar efficacy rate as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of renal calculi. There is a need for direct comparison in the literature of all modalities treating pediatric stone disease to facilitate guidelines that help treating surgeons choose the most efficacious modality offering the highest success rates with the lowest morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smaldone M, Corcoran AT, Docimo SG, Ost MC (2009) Endourological management of pediatric stone disease: present status. J Urol 181:17–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schuster TG, Russell KY, Bloom DA, Koo HP, Faerber GJ (2002) Ureteroscopy for the treatment of urolithiasis in children. J Urol 167:1813–1816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tan AH, Al-Omar M, Denstedt JD, Razvi H (2005) Ureteroscopy for pediatric urolithiasis: an evolving first-line therapy. Urology 65:153–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Minevich E, Sheldon CA (2006) The role of ureteroscopy in pediatric urology. Curr Opin Urol 16:29–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas JC, DeMarco RT, Donohoe JM, Adams MC, Pope JC IV, Brock JW III (2005) Pediatric ureteroscopic stone management. J Urol 174:1072–1074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lesani OA, Palmer JS (2006) Retrograde proximal rigid ureteroscopy and pyeloscopy in prepubertal children: safe and effective. J Urol 176:1570–1573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smaldone MC, Cannon GM Jr, Wu HY, Bassett JC, Bellinger MF, Docimo SG, Schneck FX (2007) Is ureteroscopy first-line treatment for pediatric stone disease? J Urol 178:2128–2131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim SS, Kolon TF, Canter D, White M, Casale P (2008) Pediatric flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: the children’s hospital of Philadelphia experience. J Urol 180:2616–2619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cannon GM Jr, Smaldone MC, Wu HY, Bassett JC, Bellinger MF, Docimo SG, Schneck FX (2007) Ureteroscopic management of lower-pole stones in a pediatric population. J Endourol 21:1179–1182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tanaka ST, Makari JH, Pope JC IV, Adams MC, Brock JW III, Thomas JC (2008) Pediatric ureteroscopic management of intrarenal calculi. J Urol 180:2150–2153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hubert KC, Palmer JS (2005) Passive dilation by ureteral stenting before ureteroscopy: eliminating the need for active dilation. J Urol 174:1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Corcoran AT, Smaldone MC, Mally D, Ost MC, Bellinger MF, Schneck FX, Docimo SG, Wu HY (2008) When is prior ureteral stent placement necessary to access the upper tract in prepubertal children? J Urol 180:1861–1863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vanlangenonck R, Landman J (2004) Ureteral access strategies: pro-access sheath. Urol Clin N Am 31:71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abrahams HM, Stoller ML (2004) The argument against the routine use of ureteral access sheath. Urol Clin N Am 31:83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Delvecchio FC, Auge BK, Brizuela RM, Weiaer AZ, Silverstein AD, Lallas CD, Pietrow PK, Albala DM, Preminger G (2003) Assessment of stricture formation with the ureteral access sheath. Urology 61:518–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John C. Thomas.

Additional information

Proceedings paper from the 3rd International Urolithiasis Research Symposium, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 3–4 December 2009.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, J.C. How effective is ureteroscopy in the treatment of pediatric stone disease?. Urol Res 38, 333–335 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0293-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0293-2

Keywords

Navigation