Skip to main content
Log in

Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Forensische Bildgebung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rechtsmedizin

Grundlagen der postmortalen Computertomographie (PMCT) für forensisch-radiologische Anwendungen – Empfehlungen und Indikationskatalog

Working Group for Forensic Imaging of the German Society of Legal Medicine

Fundamentals of postmortem computer tomography (PMCT) in Forensic Radiology – recommendations and applications

  • Empfehlungen
  • Published:
Rechtsmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

Gesetzliche Grundlagen

  1. StSV (D)

  2. RöV (D)

Weiterführende deutsch- bzw. englischsprachige Literatur in alphabetischer Reihenfolge

  1. Grabherr S, Baumann P, Fahrni S, Mangin P, Grimm J (2015) Virtuelle vs. reale forensische bildgebende Verfahren Einsatzgebiete, Vorteile und Limits. Rechtsmedizin 25(5):493–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heinemann A, Grabherr S, Vogel H (2013) Bildgebung zur Klärung des Behandlungsfehlervorwurfs. Rechtsmedizin 23(3):207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jackowski C (2011) Bildgebung in der Rechtsmedizin – Überblick über die Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Anwendung der postmortalen Bildgebung. Kriminalistik 65(12):781–788

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nushida H, Vogel H, Püschel K, Heinemann A (Hrsg) (2011) Der durchsichtige Tote – Post mortem CT und forensische Radiologie. Kovac, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stein KM, Grünberg K (2009) Forensische Radiologie. Radiologe 49(1):73–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thali M (2011) Virtuelle Autopsie (Virtopsy) in der Forensik. Pathologe 32(S2):292–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bolliger SA, Thali MJ, Aghayev E, Jackowski C, Vock P, Dirnhofer R, Christe A (2007) Postmortem noninvasive virtual autopsy. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 28(1):44–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruguier C, Mosimann PJ, Vaucher P, Uské A, Doenz F, Jackowski C et al (2013) Multi-phase postmortem CT angiography: recognizing technique-related artefacts and pitfalls. Int J Leg Med 127(3):639–652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Christe A (2010) Clinical radiology and postmortem imaging (Virtopsy) are not the same: Specific and unspecific postmortem signs. Leg Med 12:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Christe A, Ross S, Oesterhelweg L, Spendlove D, Bolliger S, Vock P, Thali MJ (2009) Abdominal trauma – sensitivity and specificity of postmortem Noncontrast imaging findings compared with autopsy findings. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 66(5):1302–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ciaffi R, Gibelli D, Cattaneo C (2011) Forensic radiology and personal identification of unidentified bodies: a review. Radiol Med 116(6):960–968

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Daly B, Abboud S, Ali Z, Sliker C, Fowler D (2013) Comparison of whole-body post mortem 3D CT and autopsy evaluation in accidental blunt force traumatic death using the abbreviated injury scale classification. Forensic Sci Int 225(1–3):20–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dirnhofer R (2009) From autopsy to Virtopsy: oral description versus image. value of evidence. In: Thali MJ, Dirnhofer R, Vock P (Hrsg) The Virtopsy approach: 3D optical and radiological scanning and reconstruction in forensic medicine, 1. Aufl. CRC Press, Boca Raton, S 3–9

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dirnhofer R, Jackowski C, Vock P, Potter K, Thali MJ (2006) VIRTOPSY: minimally invasive, imaging-guided virtual autopsy. Radiographics 26(5):1305–1333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Filograna L, Tartaglione T, Filograna E, Cittadini F, Oliva A, Pascali VL (2010) Computed tomography (CT) virtual autopsy and classical autopsy discrepancies: Radiologist’s error or a demonstration of post-mortem multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) limitation? Forensic Sci Int 195(1–3):e13–e17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grabherr S, Grimm J, Dominguez A, Vanhaebost J, Mangin P (2014) Advances in post-mortem CT-angiography. Br J Radiol 87(1036):20130488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Heinemann A, Vogel H, Heller M, Tzikas A, Püschel K (2015) Investigation of medical intervention with fatal outcome: the impact of post-mortem CT and CT angiography. Radiol Med 120(9):835–845

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Jackowski C, Schweitzer W, Thali M, Yen K, Aghayev E, Sonnenschein M et al (2005) Virtopsy: postmortem imaging of the human heart in situ using MSCT and MRI. Forensic Sci Int 149(1):11–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jeffery AJ, Rutty GN, Robinson C, Morgan B (2008) Computed tomography of projectile injuries. Clin Radiol 63(10):1160–1166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leth PM (2009) Computerized Tomography used as a routine procedure at postmortem investigations. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 30(3):219–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Michaud K, Grabherr S, Jackowski C, Bollmann MD, Doenz F, Mangin P (2014) Postmortem imaging of sudden cardiac death. Int J Leg Med 128(1):127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morgan B, Adlam D, Robinson C, Pakkal M, Rutty GN (2014) Adult post-mortem imaging in traumatic and cardio-respiratory death and its relation to clinical radiological imaging. Br J Radiol 87(1036):20130662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mueck FG, Roesch S, Scherr M, Fischer F, Geyer L, Peschel O et al (2015) How low can we go in contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the chest?: A dose-finding cadaver study using the model-based iterative image reconstruction approach. Acad Radiol 22(3):345–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Palmiere C, Binaghi S, Doenz F, Bize P, Chevallier C, Mangin P, Grabherr S (2012) Detection of hemorrhage source: The diagnostic value of post-mortem CT-angiography. Forensic Sci Int 222(1–3):33–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Paperno S, Riepert T, Krug B, Rothschild MA, Schultes A, Staak M, Lackner L (2005) Prospektive Untersuchung zur Wertigkeit der postmortalen Computertomographie im Vergleich zur Autopsie. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr 177(01):130–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Proisy M, Marchand AJ, Loget P, Bouvet R, Roussey M, Pelé F et al (2013) Whole-body post-mortem computed tomography compared with autopsy in the investigation of unexpected death in infants and children. Eur Radiol 23(6):1711–1719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramsthaler F, Kettner M, Gehl A, Verhoff MA (2010) Digital forensic osteology: morphological sexing of skeletal remains using volume-rendered cranial CT scans. Forensic Sci Int 195(1–3):148–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Roberts ISD, Benamore RE, Benbow EW, Lee SH, Harris JN, Jackson A et al (2012) Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study. Lancet 379(9811):136–142

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ross SG, Thali MJ, Bolliger S, Germerott T, Ruder TD, Flach PM (2012) Sudden death after chest pain: feasibility of virtual autopsy with postmortem CT Angiography and biopsy. Radiology 264(1):250–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rutty GN, Brough A, Biggs MJP, Robinson C, Lawes SDA, Hainsworth SV (2013) The role of micro-computed tomography in forensic investigations. Forensic Sci Int 225(1–3):60–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Scholing M, Saltzherr TP, Fung Kon Jin PHP, Ponsen KJ, Reitsma JB, Lameris JS, Goslings JC (2009) The value of postmortem computed tomography as an alternative for autopsy in trauma victims: a systematic review. Eur Radiol 19(10):2333–2341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Sidler M, Jackowski C, Dirnhofer R, Vock P, Thali M (2007) Use of multislice computed tomography in disaster victim identification – advantages and limitations. Forensic Sci Int 169(2–3):118–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Thali MJ, Ross S, Oesterhelweg L, Grabherr S, Buck U, Naether S et al (2007) Virtopsy. Rechtsmedizin 17(1):7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yen K, Lövblad KO, Scheurer E, Ozdoba C, Thali MJ, Aghayev E et al (2007) Post-mortem forensic neuroimaging: Correlation of MSCT and MRI findings with autopsy results. Forensic Sci Int 173(1):21–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zerlauth JB, Doenz F, Dominguez A, Palmiere C, Uske A, Meuli R, Grabherr S (2013) Surgical interventions with fatal outcome: utility of multi-phase postmortem CT angiography. Forensic Sci Int 225(1–3):32–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Fischer.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

H. Fischer und A. Heinemann geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Version 1, Stand Oktober 2015

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fischer, H., Heinemann, A. Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Forensische Bildgebung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rechtsmedizin. Rechtsmedizin 26, 284–290 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-016-0096-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-016-0096-z

Navigation