Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Biomechanical properties of prolapsed vaginal tissue in pre- and postmenopausal women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between biomechanical properties and the occurrence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) through analysis on biomechanical properties of vaginal tissue. The biopsy specimens were obtained from 43 patients undergoing transvaginal hysterectomy, who were assigned into premenopausal POP, postmenopausal POP, premenopausal control and postmenopausal control groups. Tissue specimens were biomechanically assessed by a purpose-built tissue puller system, and stress–strain curves were digitally recorded. The Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio, maximum elongation, maximum fracture of vaginal tissue were 9.45 ± 0.70, 0.43 ± 0.01, 1.50 ± 0.02, 0.60 ± 0.02 in premenopausal POP group; 12.10 ± 1.10, 0.39 ± 0.01, 1.14 ± 0.05, 0.27 ± 0.03 in postmenopausal POP group; 6.65 ± 1.48, 0.46 ± 0.01, 1.68 ± 0.11, 0.79 ± 0.05 in premenopausal control group and 10.26 ± 1.10, 0.42 ± 0.01, 1.37 ± 0.04, 0.42 ± 0.03 in postmenopausal control group. There was significant difference in biomechanical properties between premenopausal POP group and premenopausal control group (p < 0.01). There was significant difference in biomechanical properties between postmenopausal POP group and postmenopausal control group (p < 0.01). Biomechanical properties in POP group were significantly lower than that in control group, suggesting that degeneration of biomechanical properties in pelvic support construction might lead to the occurrence of POP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Paraiso MF, Walters MD (2005) Functional bowel and anorectal disorders in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(6):2105–2111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Woodman PJ, Swift SE, O’boyle AL, Valley MT, Bland DR, Kahn MA, Schaffer JI (2006) Prevalence of severe pelvic organ prolapse in relation to job description and socioeconomic status: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(4):340–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Auwad W, Bombieri L, Adekanmi O, Waterfield M, Freeman R (2006) The development of pelvic organ prolapse after colposuspension: a prospective, long-term follow-up study on the prevalence and predisposing factors. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(4):389–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weber AM, Richter HE (2005) Pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 106(3):615–634

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tegerstedt G, Maehle-Schmidt M, Nyren O, Hammarstrom M (2005) Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in a Swedish population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16(6):497–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lang JH (2005) Urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery: past, present and future 2. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 40(3):145–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ettema GJC (1997) Mechanical behaviour of rat skeletal muscle during latiguing stretch-shorten cycle. Exp Physiol 82:107–119

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ettema GJC, Goh JTW, Forwood MR (1998) A new method to measure elastic properties of plastic-viscoelastic connective tissue. Med Eng Phys 20:308–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong MY, Harmanli OH, Agar M, Dandolu V, Grody MH (2003) Collagen content of nonsupport tissue in pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(6):1579–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. FitzGerald MP, Mollenhauer J, Hale DS, Benson JT, Brubaker L (2000) Urethral collagen morphologic characteristics among women with genuine stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1565–1574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Norton P, Boyd C, Ekman G, Malmstrom A, Ulmsten U (1994) Decreased collagen synthesis in stress incontinent women. Obstet Gynecol 84:583–586

    Google Scholar 

  12. Falconer C, Ekman G, Malmstrom A, Ulmsten U (1994) Decreased collagen synthesis in stress incontinent women. Obstet Gynecol 84:583–586

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rechberger T, Postawski K, Jakowicki JA, Gunja-Smith Z, Woessner JF (1998) Role of fascial collagen in stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1511–1514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ettema GJC, Goh JTW, Forwood MR (1998) A new method to measure elastic properties of plastic-viscoelastic connective tissue. Med Eng Phys 20:308–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LT, Delancey JOL, Klarksor P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bai SW, Choe BH, Kim JY, Park KH (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse and connective tissue abnormalities in Korean women. J Reprod Med 47:231–234

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Norton P, Boyd C, Deak S (1992) Collagen synthesis in women with genital prolapse or stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 11:300

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson SR, Avery CH, Tarlton JF et al (1996) Changes in metabolism of collagen in genitourinary prolapse. Lancet 347:1658–1661

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Landon CR et al (1990) Mechanical properties of fascia during pregnancy: a possible factor in the development of stress incontinence of urine. Contemp Rev Obstet Gynecol 2:40–46

    Google Scholar 

  20. Adekanmi O et al (2005) Cystocele: Does anterior repair fail because of weak vaginal wall tissue? Int Urogynecol J 16(Suppl 2):S72 (Abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Goh JT (2002) Biomechanic properties of prolapse vaginal tissue in pre and post menopausal women. Int Urogynecol J 13(2):76–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cosson M, Lambaudie E, Boukerrou M et al (2004) A biomechanical study of the strength of vaginal tissue. Results on 16 post menopausal patients presenting with genital prolpase. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 112(2):201–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fuzhou Dongfang Hospital, Fuzhou, 350025, Fujian, People’s Republic of China

    Lingling Lei & Yanfeng Song

  2. Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian, People’s Republic of China

    RiQi Chen

Authors
  1. Lingling Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yanfeng Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. RiQi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanfeng Song.

Additional information

Grant Fujian Science & Technology Bureau Foundation No. 2000I1003.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lei, L., Song, Y. & Chen, R. Biomechanical properties of prolapsed vaginal tissue in pre- and postmenopausal women. Int Urogynecol J 18, 603–607 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0214-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-006-0214-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation