Skip to main content
Log in

A novel simulation method for interaction of machining process and machine tool structure

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dynamic performance of the machine tool system plays an important role on the machining process. On the other hand, it is difficult to consider the machine tool’s dynamic performance in the previous cutting simulation method. In this paper, a novel simulation method for the interaction simulation between the machining process and machine tool structure is presented. The influence of the dynamic performance of machine tool structure on the machining process and the interaction between them are considered by simplifying the machine tool structure in a novel finite element cutting simulation model. This model is used for potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KDP) crystal machining simulation; the chip formation and the waviness prediction are realized, and the simulation results agree well with the experiments, which provide the evidence and accuracy of this presented method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brecher C, Esser M, Witt S (2009) Interaction of manufacturing process and machine tool. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58:588–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abele E, Weigold M, Rothenbucher S (2007) Modeling and identification of an industrial robot for machining applications. Ann CIRP 56(1):387–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asad M, Mabrouki T, Memon AA et al (2012) Three-dimensional finite element modeling of rough to finish down-cut milling of an aluminum alloy. Proc IMechE B J Eng Manuf 227:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Felicia CJ, Galle T, Waele WD et al (2012) FEA modeling of orthogonal cutting of steel: a review. Sustainable Construction and Design 3:98–105

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kim JS, Lee BH (1991) An analytical model of dynamic cutting forces in chatter vibration. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 31:371–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Altintas Y (2000) Manufacturing automation: metal cutting mechanics, machine tool vibrations, and CNC design. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge

  7. Altintas Y, Kersting P, Biermann D et al (2014) Virtual process systems for part machining operations[J]. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 63(2):585–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bisu CF, Laheurte R, Dranis P et al (2012) Dynamic behavior characterization of the milling tool during the cutting process, Vol III. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Piendl S, Aurich J (2006) FEM simulation of chip formation coupled with process dynamics. J Manag Eng 220:1597–1604

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paolo A, Nicola C, Giacomo B et al (2012) The effects of dynamic interaction between machine tool subsystems on cutting process stability. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58:923–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kehl G (2014) Design improvement of machine tools by integration of cutting process model into finite element analysis. The 3rd International Conference on Design Engineering and Science, Pilsen

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brecher C, Bäumler S, Guralnik A (2013) Machine tool dynamics-advances in metrological investigation, modeling and simulation techniques, optimization of process stability. Proceedings of the 5th Manufacturing Engineering Society International Conference, Zaragoza

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marsh ER, Arneson D, Doren MV et al (2006) Interferometric measurement of workpiece flatness in ultra precision fly cutting. Sens Rev 26:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen WQ, Sun YZ, An CH, et al (2014) Modeling and simulation of the interaction of manufacturing process and machine tool structure in flycutting machining. Proc IMechE C J Mech Eng Sci. doi:10.1177/0954406214563962

  15. Taylor JS, Carlisle K, Klingmann JL et al (2010) Precision engineering within the National Ignition Campaign. Proceedings of the euspen International Conference, Delft, pp 248–255

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang W, Li KY, Wang J et al (2011) Analysis on dependence of phase matching angle on temperature in KDP crystal. Opt Laser Technol 43:683–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li KY, Jia HT, Wang CC et al (2009) Theory and experiment analysis of factors affecting THG efficiency for the TIL prototype laser facility. Optik 120:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Auerbach JM, Wegner PJ, Couture SA et al (2001) Modeling of frequency doubling and tripling with measured crystal spatial refractive index nonuniformities. Appl Opt 40:1404–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. LiangYC CWQ, Bai QS et al (2012) Dynamic design approach of an ultra-precision machine tool used for optical parts machining. Proc IMechE B J Eng Manuf 226:1930–1936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen WQ, Liang YC, Sun YZ et al (2014) Design philosophy of an ultra-precision fly cutting machine tool for KDP crystal machining and its implementation on the structure design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70:429–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liang YC, Chen WQ, Bai QS et al (2013) Design and dynamic optimization of an ultraprecision diamond flycutting machine tool for large KDP crystal machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7(6):1564–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin ZC, Lai WL, Lin HY et al (2000) The study of ultraprecision machining and residual stress for NiP alloy with different cutting speeds and depth of cut. J Mater Process Technol 97:200–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lo S-P, Lin YY (2002) An investigation of sticking behavior on the chip–tool interface using thermo-elastic–plastic finite element method. J Mater Process Technol 121:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dao M, Chollacoop N, Van KJ et al (2001) Computational modeling of the forward and reverse problems in instrumented sharp indentation. Acta Mater 49:3899–3918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zong WJ, Li ZQ, Zhang L et al (2013) Finite element simulation of diamond tool geometries affecting the 3D surface topography in fly cutting of KDP crystals[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(9–12):1927–1936

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haitao Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, W., Liu, H., Sun, Y. et al. A novel simulation method for interaction of machining process and machine tool structure. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88, 3467–3474 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9068-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9068-4

Keywords

Navigation