Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Customer-driven product configuration optimization for assemble-to-order manufacturing enterprises

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Configuration design has been recognized as an effective means to implement mass customization. Traditional configuration technologies mostly focus on practices from an engineering perspective on the basis of constraint and experience, yet leave the customer’s viewpoints intact. In this paper, a new optimization approach for customer-driven product configuration is proposed. Configuration space is firstly established as the foundation for targeting diversity of customer needs and utility function is then employed to model and measure customer preference. Subsequently, a mathematic model that maximizes the ratio between overall utility and cost from both perspectives of customers and manufacturers is formulated, and a genetic algorithm is adopted to solve the combinatory optimization problem wherein the nested encoding scheme and multiple constraints handling are incorporated to improve the performance of configuration solving. A case study of a notebook computer is reported to demonstrate that the proposed approach provides an effective means for ATO manufacturing enterprises to deliver the optimal configuration solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pine BJ (1993) Mass customization: the new frontier in business competition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  2. Felfernig A, Fredrich G, Jannach D (2001) Conceptual modeling for configuration of mass customizable products. Artif Intel Eng 15(1):165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiao JX, Mitchell MT (1999) A methodology of developing product family architecture for mass customization. J Intel Manuf 10(1):3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang JS, Wang QF, Wan L, Zhong YF (2005) Configuration-oriented product modeling and knowledge management for made-to-order manufacturing enterprises. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25(1–2):41–52

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xie H, Henderson P, Kernahan M (2005) Modeling and solving engineering product configuration problems by constraint satisfaction. Int J Prod Res 10(1):3–20

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jiao J, Zhang Y (2005) Product portfolio planning based on customer-engineering interaction. IIE Trans 37(9):801–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stone RB, Wood KL, Crawford RH (2000) A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures. Des Study 21(1):5–31

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yu TL, Yassine AA, Goldberg DE (2003) A generic algorithm for developing modular product architectures. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Chicago, IL, V3:515–524

  9. Erens F, Verhulst K (1997) Architectures for product families. Compute Ind 33(2–3):165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiao JX, Mitchell MT (1999) An information modeling framework for product families to support mass customization production. Ann CIRP 48(1):93–98

    Google Scholar 

  11. Du XH, Jiao JX, Mitchell MT (2003) Modeling platform-based product configuration using programmed attributed graph grammars. J Eng Des 14(2):145–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonzalez-Zugasti JP, Otto KN, Baker JD (2001) Assessing value in platformed product family design. Res Eng Des - Theory Appl Concur Eng 13(1):30–41

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang HJ, Sun BY, Zhang JM, Wang JJ, Wei XP (2005) Modular product configuration design for customer requirement-driven engineering. Chin J Mech Eng 41(4):85–91

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michalek JJ, Feinberg FM, Papalambros PY (2005) Linking marketing and engineering product design decisions via analytic target cascading. J Prod Innov Manage 22(1):42–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiao JX, Zhang YY (2004) A heuristic genetic algorithm for product portfolio planning 2004 IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems, 1–3 Dec 2004, Singapore, pp 613–618

  16. Xu ZH, Liang M (2005) Concurrent optimization of product module selection and assembly line configuration: a multi-objective approach. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 127(11):875–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thurston DL, Carnahan JV (1992) Fuzzy rating and utility analysis in preliminary design evaluation with multiple attributes. Res Eng Des 3(2):105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Du XH, Jiao JX, Mitchell MT (2006) Understanding customer value in product customization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol DOI 10.1007/s00170-005-0177-8

  19. Besharati B, Luo L, Azarm S (2006) Multi-objective single product robust optimization: an integrated design and marketing approach. ASME J Mech Des 128(7):884–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Green PE, Srinivasan V (1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice. J Market 54(10):3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurapati A, Azarm S, Wu J (2002) Constraint handling improvements for multi-objective genetic algorithms. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 23(3):204–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Balakrishnan PVS, Jacob VS (1996) Genetic algorithms for product design. Manage Sci 41(2):1105–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhihang Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, C., Lin, Z. & Liu, C. Customer-driven product configuration optimization for assemble-to-order manufacturing enterprises. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38, 185–194 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1089-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1089-6

Keywords

Navigation