Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamic microsimulation to model multiple outcomes in cohorts of critically ill patients

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Existing intensive care unit (ICU) prediction tools forecast single outcomes, (e.g., risk of death) and do not provide information on timing.

Objective

To build a model that predicts the temporal patterns of multiple outcomes, such as survival, organ dysfunction, and ICU length of stay, from the profile of organ dysfunction observed on admission.

Design

Dynamic microsimulation of a cohort of ICU patients.

Setting

49Forty-nine ICUs in 11 countries.

Patients

One thousand four hundred and forty-nine patients admitted to the ICU in May 1995.

Interventions

None.

Model construction

We developed the model on all patients (n=989) from 37 randomly-selected ICUs using daily Sequential Organ Function Assessment (SOFA) scores. We validated the model on all patients (n=460) from the remaining 12 ICUs, comparing predicted-to-actual ICU mortality, SOFA scores, and ICU length of stay (LOS).

Main results

In the validation cohort, the predicted and actual mortality were 20.1% (95%CI: 16.2%–24.0%) and 19.9% at 30 days. The predicted and actual mean ICU LOS were 7.7 (7.0–8.3) and 8.1 (7.4–8.8) days, leading to a 5.5% underestimation of total ICU bed-days. The predicted and actual cumulative SOFA scores per patient were 45.2 (39.8–50.6) and 48.2 (41.6–54.8). Predicted and actual mean daily SOFA scores were close (5.1 vs 5.5, P=0.32). Several organ-organ interactions were significant. Cardiovascular dysfunction was most, and neurological dysfunction was least, linked to scores in other organ systems.

Conclusions

Dynamic microsimulation can predict the time course of multiple short-term outcomes in cohorts of critical illness from the profile of organ dysfunction observed on admission. Such a technique may prove practical as a prediction tool that evaluates ICU performance on additional dimensions besides the risk of death.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baue AE (1997) Multiple organ failure, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Why no magic bullets? Arch Surg 132:703–707

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sauaia A, Moore FA, Moore EE, Norris JM, Lezotte DC, Hamman RF (1998) Multiple organ failure can be predicted as early as 12 hours after injury. J Trauma 45:291–301

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baue AE (1975) Multiple, progressive, or sequential systems failure. A syndrome of the 1970 s. Arch Surg 110:779–781

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baue AE (1992) The horror autotoxicus and multiple-organ failure. Arch Surg 127:1451–1462

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference (1992) Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 20:864–874

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sznajder M, Aegerter P, Launois R, Merliere Y, Guidet B, CubRea (2001) A cost-effectiveness analysis of stays in intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 27:146–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) Prognosis in acute organ-system failure. Ann Surg 202:685–693

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, de Mendonca A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Le Gall JR, Klar J, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F, Alberti C, Artigas A, Teres D (1996) The Logistic Organ Dysfunction system. A new way to assess organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit. JAMA 276:802–810

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hebert PC, Drummond AJ, Singer J, Bernard GR, Russell JA (1993) A simple multiple system organ failure scoring system predicts mortality of patients who have sepsis syndrome. Chest 104:230–235

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wheeler A, Carmichael L, Christman B (1995) Renal function abnormalities in sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 151:A317

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Melot C, Vincent JL (2001) Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA 286:1754–1758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cox DR, Oakes D (1984) Analysis of survival data. Chapman & Hall, London

  14. Gray RJ (1994) Spine-based tests in survival analysis. Biometrics 50:640–652

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vincent JL, de Mendonca A, Cantraine F, Moreno R, Takala J, Suter PM, Sprung CL, Colardyn F, Blecher S (1998) Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Crit Care Med 26:1793–1800

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cronin KA, Legler JM, Etzioni RD (1998) Assessing uncertainty in microsimulation modelling with application to cancer screening interventions. Stat Med 17:2509–2523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moreno R, Vincent JL, Matos R, Mendonca A, Cantraine F, Thijs L, Takala J, Sprung C, Antonelli M, Bruining H, Willatts S (1999) The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care. Results of a prospective, multicentre study. Working Group on Sepsis related Problems of the ESICM. Intensive Care Med 25:686–696

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE, Bergner M, Bastos PG, Sirio CA, Murphy DJ, Lotring T, Damiano AM, Harrell FEJ (1991) The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 100:1619–1636

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rubin DB (1987) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. John Wiley, New York

  20. Barie PS, Hydo LJ, Fischer E (1994) A prospective comparison of two multiple organ dysfunction/failure scoring systems for prediction of mortality in critical surgical illness. J Trauma 37:660–666

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zimmerman JE, Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Sun X, Hakim RB, Nystrom PO (1996) A comparison of risks and outcomes for patients with organ system failure: 1982–1990. Crit Care Med 24:1633–1641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rangel-Frausto MS, Pittet D, Hwang T, Woolson RF, Wenzel RP (1998) The dynamics of disease progression in sepsis: Markov modeling describing the natural history and the likely impact of effective antisepsis agents. Clin Infect Dis 27:185–190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR (1993) Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making 13:322–338

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilles Clermont.

Additional information

Financial support: partially supported by Eli Lilly & Company (Gilles Clermont and Derek C. Angus) and by the Stiefel-Zangger Foundation, University of Zurich, Switzerland (Vladimir Kaplan)

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clermont, G., Kaplan, V., Moreno, R. et al. Dynamic microsimulation to model multiple outcomes in cohorts of critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 30, 2237–2244 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2456-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2456-5

Keywords

Navigation