Abstract
Background
Efficient literature searching and the application of formal rules of evidence in evaluating the clinical literature are the two key skills defining the practice of evidence-based medicine. Although clinicians embrace the concepts of evidence-based medicine, most identify limited personal time as the major barrier towards its implementation into daily practice. Busy clinicians who practice evidence-based medicine identify systematic reviews and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines as very useful resources.
Methods
This review presents a simple, easy-to-follow, three-step searching strategy that emphasises the use of powerful new PubMed features that allow clinicians to retrieve high-quality systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines and primary studies with a single mouse click. The overall effectiveness of the process is further improved by highlighting the major features of successful and unsuccessful literature searches.
Conclusions
At the end of this tutorial the reader should be able to conduct efficient and effective literature searches that support clinical decision making in under 10 minutes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Haynes R, McKibbon A, Fitzgerald D, Guyatt G, Walker C, Sackett D (1986) How to keep up with the medical literature. V. Access by personal computer to the medical literature. Ann Intern Med 105:810–824
Haynes R, McKibbon A, Walker C, Ryan N, Fitzgerald D, Ramsden M (1990) Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings: a study of use and usefulness. Ann Intern Med 112:78–84
Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1992) Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268:2420–2425
Clinicians for the Restoration of Autonomous Practice (CRAP) Writing Group (2002) EBM: unmasking the ugly truth. BMJ 325:1496–1498
Shea S (2002) PubMed and me: why my coughs are more productive than my searches. Can Med Assoc J 167:1347–1348
McColl A, Smith H, White P, Field J (1998) General practitioners perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey. BMJ 316:361–365
Young J, Ward J (2001) Evidence-based medicine in general practice: beliefs and barriers amongst Australian GPs. J Eval Clin Pract 7:201–210
Sackett D (1997) So little time, and... Evid Based Med 2:39
Cook D, Meade M, Fink M (1996) How to keep up with the critical care literature and avoid being buried alive. Crit Care Med 24:1757–1768
Smith R, Chalmers I (2001) Britain's gift: a "Medline" of synthesised evidence: worldwide free access to evidence-based resources could transform health care. BMJ 323:1437–1438
Kotzin S (2002) Medline and PubMed will be able to systhesise clinical data. BMJ 324:791
Hersh W, Hickman D (1998) How well do physicians use electronic information retrieval systems? A framework for investigation and systematic review. JAMA 280:1347–1352
Oxman A, Sackett D, Guyatt G, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1993) Users' guides to the medical literature. I. How to get started. JAMA 270:2093–2095
Richardson W, Wilson M, Nishikawa J, Hayward R (1995) The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club 123:A12–A13
Cook D, Sackett D, Spitzer W (1995) Methodological guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 48:167–171
Oxman A, Cook D, Guyatt G (1994) Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 272:1367–1371
Shojania K, Bero L (2001) Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy. Eff Clin Pract 4:157–162
Cook D, Greengold N, Ellrodt A, Weingarten S (1997) The relation between systematic reviews and practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 127:210–216
LeLorier J, Gregoire G, Benhaddad A, Lapierre J, Derderian F (1997) Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 337:536–542
Haynes R, Wilczynski N, McKibbon A, Walker C, Sinclair J (1994) Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1:447–458
Kingsland L, Harbourt A (1993) COACH: applying UMLS knowledge sources in an expert searcher environment. Bull Med Library Assoc 81:178–183
Hersh W, Crabtree M, Hickam D, Sacherek M, Friedman C, Tidmarsh P, Mosbaek C, Kraemer D (2002) Factors associated with success in searching Medline and applying evidence to answer clinical questions. J Am Informatics Assoc 9:283–293
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by unrestricted educational grants from ResMed and the Northcare Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doig, G.S., Simpson, F. Efficient literature searching: a core skill for the practice of evidence-based medicine. Intensive Care Med 29, 2119–2127 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1942-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1942-5