Abstract
Molecular markers allow to estimate the pairwise relatedness between the members of a breeding pool when their selection history is no longer available or has become too complex for a classical pedigree analysis. The field of population genetics has several estimation procedures at its disposal, but when the genotyped individuals are highly selected inbred lines, their application is not warranted as the theoretical assumptions on which these estimators were built, usually linkage equilibrium between marker loci or even Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, are not met. An alternative approach requires the availability of a genotyped reference set of inbred lines, which allows to correct the observed marker similarities for their inherent upward bias when used as a coancestry measure. However, this approach does not guarantee that the resulting coancestry matrix is at least positive semi-definite (psd), a necessary condition for its use as a covariance matrix. In this paper we present the weighted alikeness in state (WAIS) estimator. This marker-based coancestry estimator is compared to several other commonly applied relatedness estimators under realistic hybrid breeding conditions in a number of simulations. We also fit a linear mixed model to phenotypical data from a commercial maize breeding programme and compare the likelihood of the different variance structures. WAIS is shown to be psd which makes it suitable for modelling the covariance between genetic components in linear mixed models involved in breeding value estimation or association studies. Results indicate that it generally produces a low root mean squared error under different breeding circumstances and provides a fit to the data that is comparable to that of several other marker-based alternatives. Recommendations for each of the examined coancestry measures are provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson AD, Weir BS (2007) A maximum-likelihood method for the estimation of pairwise relatedness in structured populations. Genetics 176:421–440
Balding DJ (2003) Likelihood-based inference for genetic correlation coefficients. Theor Popul Biol 63:221–230
Bernardo R (1993) Estimation of coefficient of coancestry using molecular markers in maize. Theor Appl Genet 85:1055–1062
Bernardo R (1994) Prediction of maize single-cross performance using RFLPs and information from related hybrids. Crop Sci 34:20–25
Bernardo R (1995) Genetic models for predicting maize single-cross performance in unbalanced yield trial data. Crop Sci 35:141–147
Bernardo R (1996a) Best linear unbiased prediction of the performance of crosses between untested maize inbreds. Crop Sci 36:50–56
Bernardo R (1996b) Best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance. Crop Sci 36:872–876
Casa AM, Pressoir G, Brown PJ, Mitchell SE, Rooney WL, Tuinstra MR, Franks CD, Kresovich S (2008) Community resources and strategies for association mapping in sorghum. Crop Sci 48:30–40
Cox TS, Kiang YT, Gorman MB, Rodgers DM (1985) Relationship between coefficient of parentage and genetic similarity indices in soybean. Crop Sci 25:529–532
Emik L, Terrill C (1949) Systematic procedures for calculating inbreeding coefficients. J Hered 40:51–55
Gilmour A, Gogel B, Cullis B, Welham S, Thompson R (2002) ASREML User Guide Release 1.0. VSN International Ltd
Gower JC (1971) A general coefficient of similariy and some of its properties. Biometrics 27:857–874
Hayes JF, Hill WG (1981) Modification of estimates of parameters in the construction of genetic selection indices (‘Bending’). Biometrics 37:483–493
Henshall JM, Meyer K (2002) PDMATRIX–Programs to make matrices positive definite. In: Proceedings of the 7th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, vol 33. Communication No. 28–12, pp 753–754
Hepler AB (2005) Improving forensic identification using Bayesian networks and relatedness estimation. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Ho JC, Kresovich S, Lamkey KR (2005) Extent and distribution of genetic variation in U.S. Maize: historically important lines and their open-pollinated dent and flint progenitors. Crop Sci 45:1891–1900
Jacquard A (1974) The genetic structure of populations. Springer, New York
Jannink JL, Bink MCAM, Jansen RC (2001) Using complex plant pedigrees to map valuable genes. Trend Plant Sci 6:337–342
Jorjani H, Klei L, Emanuelson U (2003) A simple method for weighted bending of genetic (co)variance matrices. J Dairy Sci 86:677–679
Labate JA, Lamkey KR, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S, Sullivan H, Smith SC (2003) Molecular and historical aspects of corn belt dent diversity. Crop Sci 43:80–91
Li CC, Weeks DE, Chakravarti A (1993) Similarity of DNA fingerprints due to chance and relatedness. Hum Hered 43:45–52
Loiselle BA, Sork VL, Nason J, Graham C (1995) Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). Am J Bot 82:1420–1425
Lynch M (1988) Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting. Mol Biol Evol 5:584–599
Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland
Lynch M, Ritland K (1999) Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 152:1753–1766
Maenhout S, De Baets B, Haesaert G, Van Bockstaele E (2007) Support vector machine regression for the prediction of maize hybrid performance. Theor Appl Genet 115:1003–1013
Maenhout S, De Baets B, Haesaert G, Van Bockstaele E (2008) Marker-based screening of maize inbred lines using support vector machine regression. Euphytica 161:123–131
Meza JC, Oliva RA, Hough PD, Williams PJ (2007) OPT++: an object-oriented toolkit for nonlinear optimization. ACM (TOMS) 33(2), article 12
Milligan BG (2002) Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness. Genetics 163:1153–1167
Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7(4):308–313
Panter DM, Allen FL (1995a) Using best linear unbiased predictions to enhance breeding for yield in soybean. 1. Choosing parents. Crop Sci 35:397–405
Panter DM, Allen FL (1995b) Using best linear unbiased predictions to enhance breeding for yield in soybean. 2. Selection of superior crosses from a limited number of yield trials. Crop Sci 35:405–410
Piepho HP, Möhring J, Melchinger AE, Büchse A (2008) BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica 161:209–228
Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275
Ritland K (1996) Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients. Genet Res 67:175–185
Sørensen AC, Pong-Wong R, Windig JJ, Woolliams JA (2002) Precision of methods for calculating identity-by-descent matrices using multiple markers. Genet Sel Evol 34:557–579
Stich B, Melchinger AE, Frisch M, Maurer HP, Heckenberger M, Reif JC (2005) Linkage disequilibrium in European elite maize germplasm investigated with SSRs. Theor Appl Genet 111:723–730
Stich B, Melchinger AE, Piepho HP, Hamrit S, Schipprack W, Maurer HP, Reif JC (2007) Potential causes of linkage disequilibrium in a European maize breeding program investigated with computer simulations. Theor Appl Genet 115:529–536
Stuber C, Cockerham C (1966) Gene effects and variances in hybrid populations. Genetics 54:1279–1286
Thompson EA (1975) The estimation of pairwise relationships. Ann Hum Genet 39:173–188
Van de Casteele T, Galbusera P, Matthysen E (2001) A comparison of microsatellite-based pairwise relatedness estimators. Mol Ecol 10:1539–1549
Wang J (2002) An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. Genetics 160:1203–1215
Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114–138
Wright S (1951) The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugen 15:323–354
Yu JM, Pressoir G, Briggs WH, Bi IV, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF, McMullen MD, Gaut BS, Nielsen DM, Holland JB, Kresovich S, Buckler ES (2006) A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat Genet 38:203–208
Zhang Z, Todhunter RJ, Buckler ES, Van Vleck LD (2007) Technical note: use of marker-based relationships with multiple-trait derivative-free restricted maximal likelihood. J Anim Sci 85:881–885
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the people from RAGT R2n for their unreserved and open-minded scientific contribution to this research. We would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions during the review process of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by J. Yu.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maenhout, S., De Baets, B. & Haesaert, G. Marker-based estimation of the coefficient of coancestry in hybrid breeding programmes. Theor Appl Genet 118, 1181–1192 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-0972-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-0972-y