Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Marker-based estimation of the coefficient of coancestry in hybrid breeding programmes

Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Molecular markers allow to estimate the pairwise relatedness between the members of a breeding pool when their selection history is no longer available or has become too complex for a classical pedigree analysis. The field of population genetics has several estimation procedures at its disposal, but when the genotyped individuals are highly selected inbred lines, their application is not warranted as the theoretical assumptions on which these estimators were built, usually linkage equilibrium between marker loci or even Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, are not met. An alternative approach requires the availability of a genotyped reference set of inbred lines, which allows to correct the observed marker similarities for their inherent upward bias when used as a coancestry measure. However, this approach does not guarantee that the resulting coancestry matrix is at least positive semi-definite (psd), a necessary condition for its use as a covariance matrix. In this paper we present the weighted alikeness in state (WAIS) estimator. This marker-based coancestry estimator is compared to several other commonly applied relatedness estimators under realistic hybrid breeding conditions in a number of simulations. We also fit a linear mixed model to phenotypical data from a commercial maize breeding programme and compare the likelihood of the different variance structures. WAIS is shown to be psd which makes it suitable for modelling the covariance between genetic components in linear mixed models involved in breeding value estimation or association studies. Results indicate that it generally produces a low root mean squared error under different breeding circumstances and provides a fit to the data that is comparable to that of several other marker-based alternatives. Recommendations for each of the examined coancestry measures are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson AD, Weir BS (2007) A maximum-likelihood method for the estimation of pairwise relatedness in structured populations. Genetics 176:421–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balding DJ (2003) Likelihood-based inference for genetic correlation coefficients. Theor Popul Biol 63:221–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo R (1993) Estimation of coefficient of coancestry using molecular markers in maize. Theor Appl Genet 85:1055–1062

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo R (1994) Prediction of maize single-cross performance using RFLPs and information from related hybrids. Crop Sci 34:20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo R (1995) Genetic models for predicting maize single-cross performance in unbalanced yield trial data. Crop Sci 35:141–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo R (1996a) Best linear unbiased prediction of the performance of crosses between untested maize inbreds. Crop Sci 36:50–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo R (1996b) Best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance. Crop Sci 36:872–876

    Google Scholar 

  • Casa AM, Pressoir G, Brown PJ, Mitchell SE, Rooney WL, Tuinstra MR, Franks CD, Kresovich S (2008) Community resources and strategies for association mapping in sorghum. Crop Sci 48:30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox TS, Kiang YT, Gorman MB, Rodgers DM (1985) Relationship between coefficient of parentage and genetic similarity indices in soybean. Crop Sci 25:529–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Emik L, Terrill C (1949) Systematic procedures for calculating inbreeding coefficients. J Hered 40:51–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour A, Gogel B, Cullis B, Welham S, Thompson R (2002) ASREML User Guide Release 1.0. VSN International Ltd

  • Gower JC (1971) A general coefficient of similariy and some of its properties. Biometrics 27:857–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JF, Hill WG (1981) Modification of estimates of parameters in the construction of genetic selection indices (‘Bending’). Biometrics 37:483–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henshall JM, Meyer K (2002) PDMATRIX–Programs to make matrices positive definite. In: Proceedings of the 7th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, vol 33. Communication No. 28–12, pp 753–754

  • Hepler AB (2005) Improving forensic identification using Bayesian networks and relatedness estimation. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC

  • Ho JC, Kresovich S, Lamkey KR (2005) Extent and distribution of genetic variation in U.S. Maize: historically important lines and their open-pollinated dent and flint progenitors. Crop Sci 45:1891–1900

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquard A (1974) The genetic structure of populations. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jannink JL, Bink MCAM, Jansen RC (2001) Using complex plant pedigrees to map valuable genes. Trend Plant Sci 6:337–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jorjani H, Klei L, Emanuelson U (2003) A simple method for weighted bending of genetic (co)variance matrices. J Dairy Sci 86:677–679

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Labate JA, Lamkey KR, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S, Sullivan H, Smith SC (2003) Molecular and historical aspects of corn belt dent diversity. Crop Sci 43:80–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Li CC, Weeks DE, Chakravarti A (1993) Similarity of DNA fingerprints due to chance and relatedness. Hum Hered 43:45–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loiselle BA, Sork VL, Nason J, Graham C (1995) Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). Am J Bot 82:1420–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M (1988) Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting. Mol Biol Evol 5:584–599

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Ritland K (1999) Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 152:1753–1766

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maenhout S, De Baets B, Haesaert G, Van Bockstaele E (2007) Support vector machine regression for the prediction of maize hybrid performance. Theor Appl Genet 115:1003–1013

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maenhout S, De Baets B, Haesaert G, Van Bockstaele E (2008) Marker-based screening of maize inbred lines using support vector machine regression. Euphytica 161:123–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meza JC, Oliva RA, Hough PD, Williams PJ (2007) OPT++: an object-oriented toolkit for nonlinear optimization. ACM (TOMS) 33(2), article 12

  • Milligan BG (2002) Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness. Genetics 163:1153–1167

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7(4):308–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Panter DM, Allen FL (1995a) Using best linear unbiased predictions to enhance breeding for yield in soybean. 1. Choosing parents. Crop Sci 35:397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panter DM, Allen FL (1995b) Using best linear unbiased predictions to enhance breeding for yield in soybean. 2. Selection of superior crosses from a limited number of yield trials. Crop Sci 35:405–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piepho HP, Möhring J, Melchinger AE, Büchse A (2008) BLUP for phenotypic selection in plant breeding and variety testing. Euphytica 161:209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritland K (1996) Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients. Genet Res 67:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen AC, Pong-Wong R, Windig JJ, Woolliams JA (2002) Precision of methods for calculating identity-by-descent matrices using multiple markers. Genet Sel Evol 34:557–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stich B, Melchinger AE, Frisch M, Maurer HP, Heckenberger M, Reif JC (2005) Linkage disequilibrium in European elite maize germplasm investigated with SSRs. Theor Appl Genet 111:723–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stich B, Melchinger AE, Piepho HP, Hamrit S, Schipprack W, Maurer HP, Reif JC (2007) Potential causes of linkage disequilibrium in a European maize breeding program investigated with computer simulations. Theor Appl Genet 115:529–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stuber C, Cockerham C (1966) Gene effects and variances in hybrid populations. Genetics 54:1279–1286

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson EA (1975) The estimation of pairwise relationships. Ann Hum Genet 39:173–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Casteele T, Galbusera P, Matthysen E (2001) A comparison of microsatellite-based pairwise relatedness estimators. Mol Ecol 10:1539–1549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2002) An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. Genetics 160:1203–1215

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114–138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1951) The genetical structure of populations. Ann Eugen 15:323–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu JM, Pressoir G, Briggs WH, Bi IV, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF, McMullen MD, Gaut BS, Nielsen DM, Holland JB, Kresovich S, Buckler ES (2006) A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat Genet 38:203–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Todhunter RJ, Buckler ES, Van Vleck LD (2007) Technical note: use of marker-based relationships with multiple-trait derivative-free restricted maximal likelihood. J Anim Sci 85:881–885

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the people from RAGT R2n for their unreserved and open-minded scientific contribution to this research. We would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions during the review process of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Maenhout.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maenhout, S., De Baets, B. & Haesaert, G. Marker-based estimation of the coefficient of coancestry in hybrid breeding programmes. Theor Appl Genet 118, 1181–1192 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-0972-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-0972-y

Keywords

Navigation