Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical tests for QTL and QTL-by-environment effects in segregating populations derived from line crosses

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantitative trait locus (QTL) studies in plants frequently employ phenotypic data on a population of lines (doubled haploid lines, recombinant inbred lines, etc.) tested in multiple environments. An important feature of such data is the genetic correlation among observations on the same genotype in different environments. Detection of QTL-by-environment interaction requires tests which take this correlation into account. In this article, a comparison was made of the properties of several such tests by means of simulation. The results indicate that a split-plot analysis of variance (anova), being an approximate method, tends to be too liberal under departures from the Huynh-Feldt condition. A standard two-way anova, which ignores genetic correlation, yields inappropriate tests and should be avoided. In contrast, mixed model approaches as well as univariate and multivariate repeated-measures anova yield valid results. This supports the use of a flexible mixed model framework in more complex settings, which are difficult to tackle by repeated-measures anova.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Churchill GA, Doerge RW (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138:963–971

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies RB (2002) Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative: linear model case. Biometrika 89:484–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckermann PJ, Verbyla AP, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2001) The analysis of quantitative traits in wheat mapping populations. Aust J Agric Res 52:1195–1206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (2001) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Pearson Education, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisser S, Greenhouse SW (1958) An extension of Box’s results on the use of the F-distribution in multivariate analysis. Ann Math Stat 29:885–891

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley CS, Knott SA (1992) A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers. Heredity 69:315–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh H (1978) Some approximate tests for repeated measurement designs. Psychometrika 43:161–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh H, Feldt LS (1976) Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in randomized block and split plot designs. J Educ Stat 1:69–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang CJ, Zeng ZB (1995) Multiple trait analysis of genetic mapping for quantitative trait loci. Genetics 140:1111–1127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kenward MG, Roger JH (1997) Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53:983–997

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Piepho HP (1998) Empirical best linear unbiased prediction in cultivar trials using factor analytic variance-covariance structures. Theor Appl Genet 97:195–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Piepho HP (2000) A mixed model approach to mapping quantitative trait loci in barley on the basis of multiple environment data. Genetics 156:253–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Piepho HP (2001) A quick method to compute approximate LOD thresholds for QTL detection. Genetics 157:425–432

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piepho HP, Pillen K (2004) Mixed modelling for QTL × environment interaction analysis. Euphytica 137:147–153

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piepho HP, Büchse A, Emrich K (2003) A hitchhiker’s guide to the mixed model analysis of randomized experiments. J Agron Crop Sci 189:310–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Piepho HP, Büchse A, Richter C (2004) A mixed modelling approach to randomized experiments with repeated measures. J Agron Crop Sci 190:230–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillen K, Zacharias A, Léon J (2003) Advanced backcross QTL analysis in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet 107:340–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogan JC, Keselman HJ, Mendoza JL (1979) Analysis of repeated measures. Br J Math Stat Psychol 32:269–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinker NA, Mather DE (1995) Methods for QTL analysis with progeny replicated in multiple environments. J Agric Genomics 1 (http://www.cabi-publishing.org/gateways/jag/index.html)

  • Utz HF, Melchinger AE (1996) plabqtl: a program for composite interval mapping of QTL. J Agric Genomics 1 (http://www.cabi-publishing.org/gateways/jag/index.html)

  • Utz HF, Melchinger AE, Schön CS (2000) Bias and sampling error of the estimated proportion of genotypic variance explained by QTL determined from experimental data in maize using cross validation with independent samples. Genetics 154:1839–1849

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verbyla AP, Eckermann PJ, Thompson R, Cullis BR (2003) The analysis of quantitative trait loci in multi-environment trials using a multiplicative mixed model. Aust J Agric Res 54:1395–1408

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winer BJ, Brown DR, Michels KM (1991) Statistical principles in experimental design, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger RD (1996) Heterogeneous variance-covariance structures for repeated measures. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 1:205–230

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Andreas Büchse for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. P. Piepho.

Additional information

Communicated by H.C. Becker

This paper is dedicated to Prof. Dr. H. F. Utz on the occasion of his 65th birthday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piepho, H.P. Statistical tests for QTL and QTL-by-environment effects in segregating populations derived from line crosses. Theor Appl Genet 110, 561–566 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1872-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1872-9

Keywords

Navigation