Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of risk in environmental impact assessment

  • Forum
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Risk assessment and environmental impact assessment have developed as separate traditions. While environmental impact assessment is a broad field that includes all activities that attempt to analyze and evaluate the effects of human and related actions on the environment, risk assessment has been concerned with the relatively well-defined regulatory problems and employs formal quantitative analysis of the probability of specific undesired events, such as cancer. Risk analytic approaches, particularly the explicit treatment of uncertainty, can significantly contribute to environmental assessments. This article discusses the type and sources of uncertainty in environmental assessments, techniques for their quantification, and ways to use uncertainty estimates to calculate probabilities of effects or probabilities of exceeding environmental standards and to determine the need for mitigation or additional research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 1985. Book of ASTM standards, vol. 11.04. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnthouse, L. W. 1986. Exposure assessment.In L. W. Barnthouse and G. W. Suter II (eds.), User's manual for ecological risk assessment. ORNL-6241, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnthouse, L. W., and G. W. Suter II (eds.). 1986. User's manual for ecological risk assessment. ORNL-6251, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnthouse, L. W., J. Boreman, S. W. Christensen, C. P. Goodyear, W. Van Winkle, and D. S. Vaughan. 1984. Population biology in the courtroom: the Hudson River controversy.Bioscience 34:14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnthouse, L. W., G. W. Suter II, C. F. Baes III, S. M. Bartell, M. G. Cavendish, R. H. Gardner, R. V. O'Neill, and A. E. Rosen. 1985. Environmental risk analysis for indirect coal liquefaction, ORNL/TM-9120. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnthouse, L. W., R. V. O'Neill, S. M. Bartell, and G. W. Suter II. 1986. Population and ecosystem theory in ecological risk assessment. Pages 82–96in Proceedings, Ninth ASTM symposium on aquatic toxicology and hazard assessment. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beanlands, G. E., and P. N. Duinker. 1983. An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment in Canada. Institute for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese, E. J. 1984. Principles of animal extrapolation. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Toro, D. M. 1986. Exposure assessment for complex effluents: principles and possibilities. Pages 135–151in H. L. Bergman, R. A. Kimerle, and A. W. Maki (eds.), Environmental hazard assessment for Effluents. Pergamon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairley, W. 1975. Criteria for evaluating the “small” probability of a catastrophic accident from the marine transportation of liquefied natural gas. Pages 415–452in D. E. Okrent (ed.), Risk-benefit methodology and application. UCLA-ENG-7598. University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feagans, T. B., and W. F. Biller. 1981. Risk assessment: describing the protection provided by ambient air quality standards.Environmental Professional 3:235–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., S. Lichtonstein, P. Slovic, S. L. Derby, and R. L. Keeney. 1981. Acceptable risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. H., R. V. O'Neill, J. B. Mankin, and K. D. Kumar. 1980. Comparative error analysis of six predatorprey models.Ecology 61:323–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilford, J. H. 1985. Ecological risk assessment. Presented at the 1985 Washington Conference on Environmental and Health Risk Assessment, Alexandria, Virginia, 28–29 October.

  • Goldstein, R. A., and P. F. Ricci. 1981. Ecological risk uncertainty analysis. Pages 227–232in J. W. Mitsch, R. W. Bosserman, and J. M. Klopatek (eds.), Energy and ecological modeling. Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. 1980. Comparative risks of different energy systems: evolution of the methods of studies.IAEA Bulletin 22:35–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenaga, E. E., and C. A. I. Goring. 1980. Relationship between water solubility, soil sorption, octanol-water partitioning, and concentration of chemicals in biota. Pages 78–115in J. G. Eaton, P. R. Parrish, and A. C. Hendricks (eds.), Aquatic toxicology. ASTM STP 707. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, A. E. 1981. Interlaboratory comparison, acute testing set. EPA-600/3-81-005. US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory-Duluth, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. 1966. The strategy of model building in population biology.American Scientist 54:421–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankin, J. B., R. V. O'Neill, H. H. Shugart, and B. W. Rust. 1975. The importance of validation in ecosystem analysis. Pages 63–72in G. S. Innis (ed.), New directions in the analysis of ecological systems. Simulation Councils Proceedings, Series 1(1). Simulation Councils, La Jolla, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C., and C. A. Little. 1982. A review of uncertainty estimates associated with models for assessing the impact of breeder reactor radioactivity releases. ORNL-5832. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. G., M. Henrion, S. C. Morris, and D. A. L. Amaral. 1985. Uncertainty in risk assessment.Environmental Science and Technology 19:662–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munn, R. E. (ed.). 1975. Environmental impact assessment: principles and procedures, SCOPE 5. Scientific Committee on Problems in the Environment, Toronto, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 1981. Testing for effects of chemicals on ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 1983. Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, R. V. 1973. Error analysis of ecological models. Pages 898–908in D. J. Nelson (ed.), Radionuclides in ecosystems. CONF-710501. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkhurst, M. A., Y. Onishi, and A. R. Olsen. 1981. A risk assessment of toxicants to aquatic life using environmental exposure estimates and laboratory toxicity data. Pages 59–71in D. R. Branson and K. L. Dickson (eds.), Aquatic toxicology and hazard assessment. ASTM STP 737. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, W. D. 1977. An anatomy of risk. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruckelshaus, W. D. 1983. Science, risk, and public policy.Science 221:1026–1028.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suter, G. W., II. 1985. Application of environmental risk analysis to engineered organisms. Pages 211–219in Engineered organisms in the environment: scientific issues. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter, G. W., II, D. S. Vaughan, and R. H. Gardner. 1983. Risk assessment by analysis of extrapolation error, a demonstration for effects of pollutants on fish.Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2:369–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter, G. W., II, L. W. Barnthouse, C. F. Baes III, S. M. Bartell, M. G. Cavendish, R. H. Gardner, R. V. O'Neill, and A. E. Rosen. 1984. Environmental risk analysis for direct coal liquefaction, ORNL/TM-9074. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter, G. W., II L. W. Barnthouse, J. E. Breck, R. H. Gardner, and R. V. O'Neill. 1985. Extrapolating from the laboratory to the field: how uncertain are you? Pages 400–413in R. D. Cardwell, R. Purdy, and R. C. Bahner (eds.), Aquatic toxicology and hazard assessment: seventh symposium, STP 854. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter, G. W., II, A. E. Rosen, and E. Linder. 1986. Analysis of extrapolation error.In L. W. Barnthouse and G. W. SuterII (eds.), User's manual for ecological risk assessment. ORNL-6251. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veith, G. D., D. J. Call, and L. T. Brook. 1983. Structuretoxicity relationships for fathead minnow,Pimephales promelas: narcotic industrial chemicals.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 40:743–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westman, W. E. 1985. Ecology, impact assessment, and environmental planning. Wiley-Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, A. V., and I. Burton (eds.). 1980. Environmental risk assessment, SCOPE 15. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suter, G.W., Barnthouse, L.W. & O'Neill, R.V. Treatment of risk in environmental impact assessment. Environmental Management 11, 295–303 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867157

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867157

Key words

Navigation