Skip to main content
Log in

Physiological and metabolic responses of female games and endurance athletes to prolonged, intermittent, high-intensity running at 30° and 16°C ambient temperatures

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eight female games players (GP) and eight female endurance athletes (EA) ran intermittently at high-intensity and for prolonged periods in hot (30°C) and moderate (16°C) ambient temperatures. The subjects performed a two-part (A, B) test based on repeated 20-m shuttle runs. Part A comprised 60 m of walking, a maximal 15-m sprint, 60 m of cruising (90% maximal oxygen uptake, O2max) and 60 m of jogging (45% O2max) repeated for 75 min with a 3-min rest every 15 min. Part B involved an exercise and rest pattern of 60-s running at 100% O2max and 60-s rest which was continued until fatigue. Although the GP and EA did not respond differently in terms of distances completed, performance was 25 (SEM 4)% less (main effect trial, P < 0.01) in the hot (HT) compared with the moderate trial (MT). Sprints of 15 m took longer to complete in the heat (main effect, trial, P < 0.01), and sprint performance declined during HT but not MT (interaction, trial × time, P < 0.01). A very high correlation was found between the rate of rise in rectal temperature in HT and the distance completed [GP, r =−0.94, P < 0.01; EA (n = 7), r = −0.93, P < 0.01]. Blood lactate [La ]b and plasma ammonia [NH3]p1 concentrations were higher for GP than EA, but were similar in HT and MT [La ]b, HT: GP vs EA, 8.0 (SEM 0.9) vs 4.9 (SEM 1.1) mmol · l−1; MT: GP vs EA, 8.0 (SEM 1.3) vs 4.4 (SEM 1.2) mmol · l−1; interaction, group × time, P < 0.01; [NH3]p1, HT: GP vs EA, 70.1 (SEM 12.7) vs 43.2 (SEM 6.1) mmol · l−1; MT: GP vs EA, 76.8 (SEM 8.8) vs 32.5 (SEM 3.8) μmol · l−1; interaction, group × time, P < 0.01. Ad libitum water consumption was higher in HT [HT: GP vs EA, 18.9 (SEM 2.9) vs 13.5 (SEM 1.7) ml · kg−1 · h−1; MT: GP vs EA, 12.7 (SEM 3.7) vs 8.5 (SEM 1.5) ml · kg−1 · h−1; main effect, group, n.s.; main effect, trial, P < 0.01]. These results would suggest that elevated body temperature is probably the key factor limiting performance of prolonged, intermittent, high-intensity running when the ambient temperature is high, but not because of its effect on the metabolic responses to exercise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Accepted: 19 July 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morris, J., Nevill, M. & Williams, C. Physiological and metabolic responses of female games and endurance athletes to prolonged, intermittent, high-intensity running at 30° and 16°C ambient temperatures. Eur J Appl Physiol 81, 84–92 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00013801

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00013801

Navigation