Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of pH on phase separated anaerobic digestion

  • Published:
Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A pilot scale experiment was performed for a year to develop a two-phase anaerobic process for piggery wastewater treatment (COD: 6,000 mg/L, BOD: 4,000 mg/L, SS: 500 gm/L, pH 8.4, alkalinity 6,000 mg/L). The acidogenic reactor had a total volume of 3 m3, and the methanogenic reactor, an, anaerobic up-flow sludge filter, combining a filter and a sludge bed, was also of total volume 3 m3 (1.5 m3 of upper packing material). Temperatures of the acidogenic and methanogenic reactors kept at 20°C and 35°C., respectively. When the pH of the acidogenic reactor was controlled at 6.0–7.0 with HCl, the COD removal efficiency increased from 50 to 80% over a period of six months, and as a result, the COD of the final effluent fell in the range of 1,000–1,500 mg/L. BOD removal efficiency over the same period was above 90%, and 300 to 400 mg/L was maintained in the final effluent. The average SS in the final effluent was 270 mg/L. The methane production was 0.32 m3 CH4/kg CODremoved and methane content of the methanogenic reactor was high value at 80–90%., When the pH of the acidogenic reactor was not controlled over the final two months, the pH reached 8.2 and acid conversion decreased compared with that of pH controlled, while COD removal was similar to the pH controlled operation. Without pH control, the methane content in the gas from methanogenic reactor improved to 90%, compared to 80% with pH control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen, A., R. J. Zoetemeyer, A. van Deursen, and J. C. van Andel (1979) Anaerobic digestion of glucose with separated acid production and methane formation.Water Res. 13:571–580.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghosh, S., J. R. Conrad, and D. L. Klass (1975) Anaerobic acidogenesis of wastewater sludge.J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 47:30–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Keenan, J. D. (1976) Multiple stage methane recovery from solid wastes..J. Environ. Sci. Health A11:525–548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahring, B. K., I. Angelidaki, and K. Johansen (1992) Anaerobic treatment of manure together with industrial wasterWater Sci. Technol. 25:211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  5. APHA-AWWA-WPCF (1992)Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed, Washington, D.C. USA.

  6. Sawyer, C. L., P. L. McCarty, and G. F. Parkin (1994)Chemicstry for Environmental Engineering 4th ed., pp. 608–616 McGraw-Hill International editions, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun-Chul Chung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jung, JY., Lee, SM., Shin, PK. et al. Effect of pH on phase separated anaerobic digestion. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 5, 456–459 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931947

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931947

Keyword

Navigation