Skip to main content
Log in

Provability interpretations of modal logic

  • Published:
Israel Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider interpretations of modal logic in Peano arithmetic (P) determined by an assignment of a sentencev * ofP to each propositional variablev. We put (⊥)*=“0 = 1”, (χ → ψ)* = “χ* → ψ*” and let (□ψ)* be a formalization of “ψ)* is a theorem ofP”. We say that a modal formula, χ, isvalid if ψ* is a theorem ofP in each such interpretation. We provide an axiomitization of the class of valid formulae and prove that this class is recursive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. George Boolos,Friedman’s 35th problem has an affirmative solution, Abstract*75T-E66, Notices Amer. Math. Soc.22 (1975), A-646.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harvey Friedman,One hundred and two problems in mathematical logic, J. Symbolic Logic40 (1975), 113–129.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. S. C. Kleene,Introduction to Metamathematics, Van Nostrand, New York, 1952.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Saul Kripke,Semantical analysis of modal logic I, Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math.9 (1963), 67–96.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. M. H. Löb,Solution of a problem of Leon Henkin, J. Symbolic Logic20 (1955), 115–118.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solovay, R.M. Provability interpretations of modal logic. Israel J. Math. 25, 287–304 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02757006

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02757006

Keywords

Navigation