Skip to main content
Log in

Sexual dimorphism in weight among the primates: The relative impact of allometry and sexual selection

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we examine allometric and sexual-selection explanations for interspecific differences in the amount of sexual dimorphism among 60 primate species. Based on evidence provided by statistical analyses, we reject Leutenegger and Cheverud’s [(1982). Int. J. Primatol.3:387-402] claim that body size alone is the major factor in the evolution of sexual dimorphism. The alternative proposed here is that sexual selection due to differences in the reproductive potential of males and females is the primary cause of sexual dimorphism. In addition, we propose that the overall size of a species determines whether the dimorphism will be expressed as size dimorphism,rather than in some other form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin, J. D., and Baldwin, J. (1972). The ecology and behavior of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedii) in a natural forest in western Panama.Folia primatol. 18: 161–184.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intrasexual selection inDrosophila.Heredity 2: 349–368.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R. H. V. (1971). A grazing ecosystem in the Serengeti.Sci. Am. 225(1): 86–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H. (1977a). Species differences in feeding and ranging behavior in primates. In Clutton-Brock, T. H. (ed.),Primate Ecology, Academic Press, London, pp. 557–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H. (1977b). Primate ecology and social organization.J. Zool. (Lond.) 183: 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., Harvey, P. H., and Rudder, B. (1977). Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates.Nature 269: 797–800.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., Guinness, F. E., and Albon, S. D. (1982).Red Deer: Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, N. R., and Smith, H. (1981).Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogden, M. (1974). A preliminary study of the western tarsier. In Doyle, G. A., and Walker, A. C. (eds.),Prosimian Biology, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 151–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fooden, J. (1964). Stomach contents and gastro-intestinal proportions in wild-shot Guianan monkeys.Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 22: 227–231.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frane, J. (1981). All possible subsets regression. InBMDP Statistical Software, 1981 ed., University of California Press, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galdikas, B. M. F., and Teleki, G. (1981). Variations in subsistence activities of female and male pongids: New perspectives on the origin of hominid labor division.Current Anthrop. 22: 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J. C. (1979). A Jarman-Bell model of primate feeding niches.Hum. Ecol. 7: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J. C., and Gaulin, C. K. (1982). Behavioral ecology ofAlouatta seniculus in Andean cloud forest.Int. J. Primatol. 3: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J. C., and Konner, M. (1977). On the natural diet of primates, including humans. In Wurtman, R., and Wurtman, J. (eds.),Nutrition and the Brain, Vol. 1, Raven Press, New York, pp. 1–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J. C, and Kurland, J. A. (1984). Ecological constraints on monogamy (in preparation).

  • Gaulin, S. J. C, and Sailer, L. D. (1984). Nutritional constraints and sexual selection in the evolution of body weight: Are females the ecological sex?Amer. Anthropol. 86: in press.

  • Gautier-Hion, A. (1980). Seasonal variations of diet related to species and sex in a community ofCercopithecus monkeys.J. Anim. Ecol. 49: 237–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautier-Hion, A., and Gautier, J. P. (1978). Le singe de Brazza: Un strategie original.Zeitschr. Tierpsychol. 46: 84–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittins, S. P. (1982). Feeding and ranging in the agile gibbon.Folia primatol. 38: 39–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haddow, A. H. (1952). Field and laboratory studies of an African monkey,Cercopithecus ascanius schmidti Matschie.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 122: 297–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazama, N. (1964). Weighing wild Japanese monkeys in Arashiyama.Primates 5: 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M. A., and Husain, K. A. (1982). A preliminary study of the ecology of the capped Iangur.Folia primatol. 39: 145–159.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iwamoto, T. (1982). Food and nutritional condition of free-ranging Japanese monkeys on Koshima islet during winter.Primates 23: 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarman, P. J. (1974). The social organization of antelope in. relation to their ecology.Behaviour 58: 215–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern, J. A. (1964). Observations on the habits of the Proboscis monkey,Nasalis larvatus Wurmb, made in the Brunei Bay area, Borneo.Zoologica 49: 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzey, W. G. (1981). The titi monkeys, genusCallicebus. In Coimbra-Filho, A. F., and Mittermeier, R. A. (eds.),Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, Vol. 1, Academia Brasileira de CiÊncias, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 241–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E. (1982).Experimental Design, Brooks/Cole, Belmont, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber, M. (1961).The Fire of Life, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman, D. G. (1977). Monogamy in mammals.Q. Rev. Biol. 52: 39–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koganeizawa, M. (1975). Food habits of Japanese monkeyMacaca fuscata in the Boso mountains.Contemporary Primatology, Karger, Basel, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J. R., and Davies, N. B. (1981).An Introduction to Behavioral Ecology, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutenegger, W., and Cheverud, J. (1982). Correlates of sexual dimorphism in primates: Ecological and size variables.Int. J. Primatol. 3: 387–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, S. R., and Wand, B. (1977). Sex differences in health and illness.Can. Psychol. Rev. 18: 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1971).Mathematical Ideas in Biology, Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, G. (1979).Behavioral Sex Differences in Non-Human Primates, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, A. (1979). Analysis of population changes by measurement of body weight in the Koshima troop of Japanese monkeys.Primates 20: 371–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostellor, F., and Tukey, J. W. (1977).Data Analysis and Regression, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier, J. R., and Napier, P. H. (1967).A Handbook of Living Primates, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quris, R. (1976). Données comparatives sur la socio-écologie de huit espèces de Cercopithecidae vivant dans une mÊme zone de forÊt primitive périodiquement inondée (Nord-Est du Gabon).Terre Vie 30: 193–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roonwal, M. L., and Mohnot, S. M. (1977).Primates of South Asia: Ecology, Sociobiology, and Behavior, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, M. (1982).Phi0losophy and Archeology, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, A. H. (1941). The relative size of the cranial capacity in primates.Am. J. Phys. Antion of gibbons and siamangs. Hum. Biol. 5: 212–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, A. H. (1941). The relative size of the cranial capacity in primates.Am. J. phys. Anthropol. 28: 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selander, R. K. (1972). Sexual selection and dimorphism in birds. In Campbell, B. G. (ed.),Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man: 1871-1971, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 180–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, B. T. (1983). Phyletic size and brain/body allometry: A consideration based on the african pongids and other primates.Int. J. Primatol. 4: 33–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall, I. (1976). Group structure and activity rhythm inLemur mongoz (Primates, Lemuriformes) on Anjouan and Moheli Islands, Comoro Archipelago.Anthropol. Papers Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 53(4): 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall, I., and Sussman, R. W. (1975). Observations on the ecology and behavior of the mongoose lemur,Lemur mongoz mongoz Linnaeus (Primates, Lemuriformes), at Ampijoroa, Madagascar.Anthropol. Papers Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 52(4): 193–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorington, R. W. (1968). Observations of squirrel monkeys in a Colombian forest. In Rosenbloom, L. A., and Cooper, R. (eds.),The Squirrel Monkey, Academic Press, New York, pp. 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilson, R. L. (1979). Behavior of hoolock gibbonHylobates hoolock during different seasons in Assam, India.J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 76: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilson, R. L., and Tenaza, R. R. (1976). Monogamy and duetting in an Old World monkey.Nature 263: 320–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilson, R. L., and Tenaza, R. R. (1982). Interspecific spacing between gibbonsHylobates klossi and langursPresbytis potenziani on Siberut Island, Indonesia.Am. J. Primatol. 2: 355–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. G. (ed.),Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man: 1871–1971, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 136–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. W. (1977).Exploratory Data Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, P. (1977). Feeding, ranging, and group size in the mangabey,Cercopithecus albigena. In Clutton-Brock, T. H. (ed.),Primate Ecology, Academic Press, London, pp. 183–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, K. (1981). Variations in group composition and population density of the two sympatric Mentawaian leaf-monkeys.Primates 22: 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaulin, S.J.C., Sailer, L.D. Sexual dimorphism in weight among the primates: The relative impact of allometry and sexual selection. Int J Primatol 5, 515–535 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692284

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692284

Key words

Navigation