Abstract
Entrainment of sediment particles from channel beds into the channel flow is influenced by the characteristics of the flow turbulence which produces stochastic shear stress fluctuations at the bed. Recent studies of the structure of turbulent flow has recognized the importance of bursting processes as important mechanisms for the transfer of momentum into the laminar boundary layer. Of these processes, the sweep event has been recognized as the most important bursting event for entrainment of sediment particles as it imposes forces in the direction of the flow resulting in movement of particles by rolling, sliding and occasionally saltating. Similarly, the ejection event has been recognized as important for sediment transport since these events maintain the sediment particles in suspension.
In this study, the characteristics of bursting processes and, in particular, the sweep event were investigated in a flume with a rough bed. The instantaneous velocity fluctuations of the flow were measured in two-dimensions using a small electromagnetic velocity meter and the turbulent shear stresses were determined from these velocity fluctuations. It was found that the shear stress applied to the sediment particles on the bed resulting from sweep events depends on the magnitude of the turbulent shear stress and its probability distribution. A statistical analysis of the experimental data was undertaken and it was found necessary to apply a Box-Cox transformation to transform the data into a normally distributed sample. This enabled determination of the mean shear stress, angle of action and standard error of estimate for sweep and ejection events. These instantaneous shear stresses were found to be greater than the mean flow shear stress and for the sweep event to be approximately 40 percent greater near the channel bed.
Results from this analysis suggest that the critical shear stress determined from Shield's diagram is not sufficient to predict the initiation of motion due to its use of the temporal mean shear stress. It is suggested that initiation of particle motion, but not continuous motion, can occur earlier than suggested by Shield's diagram due to the higher shear stresses imposed on the particles by the stochastic shear stresses resulting from turbulence within the flow.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anwar, H.O.; Atkins, R. 1982: Turbulence structure in an open channel flow, Euromech. 156: Mechanics of sediment transport, Istanbul, pp. 19–25
Ball, J.E.; Keshavarzy, A. 1995: Discussion on Incipient Sediment motion on non-horizontal slopes by Chiew and Parker, J. of Hyd. Res. 33(5), 723–724
Bridge, J.S. 1981: Hydraulics interpretation of grain-size distributions using a physical model for bed load transport, J. of Sediment Petrology 51, 1109–1124
Box, G.E.P.; Cox, D.R. 1964: An analysis of transformation, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 26, 211–252
Grass, A.J. 1971: Structural features of turbulent flow over smooth and rough boundaries, J. of Fluid Mechanics 50(2), 233–255
Grass, A.J. 1982: The influence of boundary layer turbulence on the mechanics of sediment transport, Euromech 156, Mechanics of sediment transport, Istanbul, pp 3–17
Helsel, D.R.; Hirsch, R.M. 1992: Statistical methods in water resources, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
Keshavarzy, A.; Ball, J.E. 1995: Instantaneous shear stress on the bed in a turbulent open channel flow, Proc. of XXVI IAHR Congress, London
Kline, S.J.; Reynolds, W.C.; Schraub, F.A.; Runstadler P.W. 1967: The structure of turbulent boundary layers, J. of Fluid Mechanics 30(4), 741–773
Krogstad, P.A.; Antonia, R.A.; Browne, L.W.B. 1992: Comparison between rough and smooth wail turbulent boundary layers, J. of Fluid Mechanics 245, 599–617
Laufer, J. 1950: Some recent measurement in a two dimensional turbulent channel, J. of Aeronautical Science 17(5), 277–287
Looney, S.W.; Gulledge, T.R. 1985: Use of the correlation coefficient with normal probability plots, The American Statistician 39, 75–79
Lyn, D.A. 1986: Turbulence and turbulent transport in sediment-laden open-channel flows, Report No. KH-R-49, W.M. Keck Laboratory of Hydraulics and Water Resources, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA
McQuivey, R.S.; Richardson, E.V. 1969: Some turbulence measurement in open-channel flow, J. of Hydraulics Division, ASCE 95(HY1), 209–223
Nakagawa, H.; Nezu, I.; Ueda H. 1975: Turbulence of open channel flow over smooth and rough beds, Proceeding of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers 241, 155–168
Nakagawa, H.; Nezu, I. 1978: Bursting phenomenon near the wall in open channel flows and its simple mathematical model, Mem. Fac. Eng., Kyoto University, Japan XL(4) 40, 213–240
Nezu, I.; Nakagawa, H. 1993: Turbulence in open-channel flows, IAHR Monograph, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Often, G.R.; Kline, S.J. 1975: A proposed model of the bursting process in turbulent boundary layers, J. of Fluid Mechanics 70(2), 209–228
Raudkivi, A.J. 1990: Loose Boundary Hydraulics, 3rd Ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford
Raupach, M.R. 1981: Conditional statistics of Reynolds stress in rough-wall and smooth-wall turbulent boundary layers, J. of Fluid Mechanics 108, 363–382
Saiedi, S. 1993: Experience in design of a laboratory flume for sediment studies, International Journal of Sediment Research 8(3), 89–101
Thorne, P.D.; Williams, J.J.; Heathershaw, A.D. 1989: In-situ acoustic measurements of marine gravel threshold and transport, Sedimentology 36, 61–74
Williams, J.J. 1990: Video observations of marine gravel transport, Geo. Mar. Lett. 10, 157–164
Yalin, M.S. 1992: River Mechanics, Pergamon Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keshavarzy, A., Ball, J.E. An analysis of the characteristics of rough bed turbulent shear stresses in an open channel. Stochastic Hydrol Hydraul 11, 193–210 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02427915
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02427915