Abstract
Electrogastrography (EGG) permits measurements of the gastric electrical activity. However, normal values of electrical activity are poorly defined. In addition, limited data are available on the effect of age and gender. Therefore, in 40 healthy subjects (age range: 19–90 years) normal values for several EGG parameters were assessed after an overnight fast for 1 hr in the fasting and fed state after ingestion of a standardized solid-liquid meal. The electrical signals were capture by a pair of surface electrodes sonographically placed on the skin overlying the gastric antrum. The dominant electrical frequency was predominantly in the defined normal frequency range between 2 and 4 cycles per minute (cpm) (P<0.001) and was higher in the postprandial than in the preprandial period (3.1 cpm vs 2.8 cpm,P=0.02). The instability of the electrical rhythm calculated by a dominant frequency instability coefficient (DFIC) was postprandially lower than in the fasting state (P=0.04). The electrical power (amplitude) increased postprandially (postprandial to fasting power ratio =2.4). To evaluate the influence of age and gender on normal values the subjects were divided into four groups (median age: male, 28 and 69 years; female, 25 and 67 years). The most parameters did not differ significantly between the groups. However, DFIC was different between the groups (P<0.05), with elderly women revealing lowest DFIC. In conclusion, normal values for several EGG parameters evaluated in this study should be included in the analysis of gastric electrical activity. The magnitude of electrical frequency and power are not influenced by age and gender, whereas the instability of the electrical frequency is influenced by these factors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alverez WC: The electrogastrogram and what it shows. JAMA 78:1116–1119, 1922
Abell TL, Malagelada J-R: Electrogastrography—current assessment and future perspectives. Dig Dis Sci 33:982–992, 1988
Geldof H, van der Schee EJ, Blankenstein M, Grashuis JL: Electrogastrographic study of gastric myoelectrical activity in patients with unexplained nausea and vomiting. Gut 27:799–808, 1986
Kwong NK, Brown BH, Whitteaker GE, Duthie HL: Electrical activity of the gastric antrum in man. Br J Surg 57:913–916, 1970
Telander RL, Morgan KG, Kreulen DL, Schemalz PF, Kelly KA, Szurszewski JH: Human gastric atony with tachygastria and gastric retention. Gastroenterology 75:495–501, 1978
You CH, Lee KY, Chey WY, Menguy R: Electrogastrographic study of patients with unexplained nausea, bloating and vomiting. Gastroenterology 79:311–314, 1980
Hamilton JW, Bellahsene BE, Reichelderfer M, Webster JG, Bass P: Human electrogastrograms: Comparison of surface and mucosal recordings. Dig Dis Sci 31:33–39, 1986
Abell TL, Malagelada J-R, Lucas AR, et al: Gastric electro-mechanical and neurohormonal function in anorexia nervosa. Gastroenterology 93:958–965, 1987
Giorgio I, Lemaire MC, Pezzola F, Abbattista N, Thouvenot J: Spectral characteristics of electrogastrography in gastric cancer. Possibilities of screening. Pathol Biol Paris 36:1211–1216, 1988
Geldof H, van der Schee EJ, van Blankenstein M, Smout AJPM, Akkermans LMA: Effects of highly selective vagotomy on gastric myoelectrical activity—an electrogastrographic study. Dig Dis Sci 35:969–975, 1990
Koch KL, Stern RM, Stewart WR, Vasey MW: Gastric emptying and gastric myoelectrical activity in patients with diabetic gastroparesis: Effect of long-term domperidone treatment. Am J Gastroenterol 84:1069–1075, 1989
Cucciara S, Riezzo G, Minella R, Pezzola F, Giorgio L, Auricchio S: Electrogastrography in non-ulcer dyspepsia. Arch Dis Child 67:613–617, 1992
Rothstein RD, Alavi A, Reynolds JC: Electrogastrography in patients with gastroparesis and effect of long-term cisapride. Dig Dis Sci 38:1518–1524, 1993
Pfaffenbach B, Wegener M, Adamek RJ, Ricken D: Elektrogastrographie in der Diagnostik gastraler Motilitätsstörungen. Med Klin 90:160–165, 1995
Mirizzi N: Optimal direction of the electrogastrographic signal in man. Med Biol Eng Comput 21:385–389, 1983
Harris AD, Parkman HP, Fisher RS: Influence of gender, menstrual cycle, and oral contraceptives on the electrogastrogram. Gastroenterology 196:A507, 1994
Smout AJPM, van der Schee EJ, Grashuis JL: What is measured in electrogastrography? Dig Dis Sci 25:179–187, 1980
Stern RM, Crawford HE, Stewart WR, Vasey MW, Koch KL: Sham feeding: Cephalic-vagal influences on gastric myoelectric activity. Dig Dis Sci 34:521–527, 1989
Chen J, McCallum RW: Electrogastrography: Measurement, analysis and prospective applications. Med Biol Eng Comput 29:339–350, 1991
Brown BH, Smallwood RH, Duthie HL, Stoddard CJ: Intestinal smooth muscle electrical potentials recorded from surface electrodes. Med Biol Eng 13:97–103, 1975
Mintchev MP, Kingma YJ, Bowes KL: Accuracy of cutaneous recordings of gastric electrical activity. Gastroenterology 104:1273–1280, 1993
Pfaffenbach B, Wedmann B, Adamek RJ, Wegener M: The significance of electrogastrographically determined amplitudes—is there a correlation to sonographically measured antral mechanical contractions? Z Gastroenterol 33:103–107, 1995
Pfaffenbach B, Adamek RJ, Schaffstein J, Lee YH, Wegener M, Ricken D: Electrogastrography for the assessment of gastric emptying in diabetics—comparison with healthy subjects and correlation to radioscintigraphy. Scand J Gastroenterol (1995, in press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pfaffenbach, B., Adamek, R.J., Kuhn, K. et al. Electrogastrography in healthy subjects. Digest Dis Sci 40, 1445–1450 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02285190
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02285190