Skip to main content
Log in

The petrophysical classification of meteorites

  • Published:
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Petrophysical properties (susceptibility, intensity of the Natural Remanent Magnetisation (NRM) and bulk density) of 489 meteorite samples from 368 meteorites are discussed. The samples, obtained from Finnish meteorite collections, represent all chemical-petrological meteorite classes and their groups. This meteorite petrophysical database has many potential applications in the geophysical studies of extraterrestrial bodies (planets and their moons, asteroids, meteorite parent bodies, etc.). Here we use the database to classify meteorites rapidly and non-destructively by applying the petrophysical classification scheme developed by Kukkonen and Pesonen [10]. For example, the main classes and many groups form distinct clusters in petrophysical relation diagrams such as susceptibility vs. density or NRM vs. susceptibility. The petrophysical classification method was tested on 24 meteorites from Czechoslovak, 3 from Swedish and one from Australian collections. The chemical-mineralogical classifications of these meteorites were previously known. The subjective classification method was also compared with a mathematical cluster analysis. The subjective classification technique was successful in 64% to 93% of the cases whereas the mathematical analysis was successful in 57% to 82% of the cases. The failures can be attributed to (i) non-uniqueness problems (cluster plots overlap) and (ii) effects of porosity, self-demagnetisation, electrical conductivity and frequency on measured values, or to biasing caused by small sample size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Anders: Origin, Age and Composition of Meteorites. Space Sci. Rev.,3 (1964), 583–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. E. Brown: Conductivity and frequency effects in measurements of susceptibility. Bull. Aust. Soc. Explor. Geophys.,10 (1979), 101–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Catalogue of the Meteorite Collection, Department of Geology, University of Helsinki, 1981.

  4. A. L. Graham, A. W. R. Bewan, R. Hutchison: Catalogue of Meteorites, 4th ed., British Museum, Natural History. London, 1985.

  5. E. S. Gorshkov, E. G. Guskova, V. I. Pochtarev: Physical properties of Meteorites. Mod. Geol.,3 (1972), 103–105.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Hamano, K. Yomogida: Magnetic Anisotropy and Porosity of Antarctic Chondrites. Mem. Natl. Inst. Polar Res., Spec. Issue25 (1982), 281–289.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. L. Hood, S. M. Cisowski: Paleomagnetism of the Moon and Meteorites, Rev. of Geophys. and Space Phys.,21 (1983), 676–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Jarosewich: Chemical Analyses of Meteorites: A Compilation of Stony and Iron Meteorite Analyses. Meteoritics,25 (1990), 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. I. Joseph: Ballistic Demagnetizing Factor in Uniformly Magnetized Rectangular Prisms. J. Appl. Phys.,38 (1967), 2405–2406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Keil: Enstatite Meteorites and Their Parent Bodies. Meteoritics,24 (1989), 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. E. Knowlton: Standard handbook for electrical engineers. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York - Toronto - London, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  12. I. T. Kukkonen, L. J. Pesonen: Classification of Meteorites by Petrophysical Methods. Bull. Geol. Soc. Finland,55 (1983), 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. C. Laul: The Shergotty Consortium and SNC Meteorites: An overview. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta,50 (1986), 875–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Mason, W. G. Melson: The Lunar Rocks, Wiley-Interscience, 1970.

  15. H. Y. McSween, Jr.: Meteorites and Their Parent Planets. Cambridge University Press, 1987.

  16. T. Nagata: Meteorite Magnetism and the Early Solar System Magnetic Field. Phys. Earth and Planet. Inter.,20 (1979), 324–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. A. Osborn: Demagnetizing Factors of the General Ellipsoid. Phys. Rev.,67 (1945), 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Poikonen: Sähkönjohtvuuden vaikutus induktiivisissa suskeptibiliteettimittauksissa (in Finnish). Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, 1980.

  19. A. E. Ringwood: Chemical Evolution of the Terrestrial Planets. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta,30 (1966), 41–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. V. S. Safronov: Problems of Origin Asteroids and Comets. Meteoritics,25 (1990), 243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. H. Soininen: Inapplicability of pulse train time-domain measurements to spectral induced polarization. Geophysics,49 (1984), 826–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. C. P. Sonett: Evidence for a Primordial Magnetic Field During the Meteorite Parent Body Era. Geophys. Res. Lett.,5 (1978), 151–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Stephenson: Single domain grain distributions II. The distribution of single domain grains in Apollo 11 lunar dust. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.,4 (1971), 361–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Terho, L. J. Pesonen and I. T. Kukkonen: Petrophysical Classification of Meteorites: New Results. Open file report Q 29.1/91/1. Laboratory for Paleomagnetism, Geophysics Department, Geological Survey of Finland, 1991.

  25. K. Tucek: Catalogue of the Collection of Meteorites of the National Museum in Prague. Muzeum Nationalie, Prague, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. R. Van Schmus, J. A. Wood: A Chemical-petrological Classification for the Chondritic Meteorites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta,31 (1967), 747–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. T. Wasson: Meteorites. Springler-Verlag, London, 1974.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. J. T. Wasson, S. P. Sedwick: Possible Sources of Meteoritic Material from Hopewell Indian Burial Mounds. Nature,222 April 5(1969), 22–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. A. Woronow: Cluster Analyses. Geobyte,2 (1987), 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Terho, M., Pesonen, L.J., Kukkonen, I.T. et al. The petrophysical classification of meteorites. Stud Geophys Geod 37, 65–82 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01613921

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01613921

Keywords

Navigation