Abstract
A comparison of pupation height in light and dark was made using 12 species ofDrosophila, representing four species groups and four different ecological backgrounds (temperate-montane forest,virilis group desert,replate group; cosmopolitanmelanogaster group; tropical forest,willistoni group). Light condition has a significant effect on pupation height in only two of the species. In the light,D. montana stays close to the food surface, whileD. melanogaster pupates higher in light than in dark. Light-dependent patterns of pupation response do not correspond to those previously reported for the light-dependent mating response. Considerable interspecific variation exists for pupation height in each species triad, some of which could provide a basis for larval niche separation. Patterns of species differences in the desertrepleta triad are the same in light and in darkness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cohet, Y., Vouidibio, J., and David, J. R. (1980). Thermal tolerance and geographic distribution: A comparison of cosmopolitan and tropical endemicDrosophila species.J. Therm. Biol. 5:69–74.
Fogleman, J. C., and Markow, T. A. (1982). Behavioral differentiation between two species of cactophilicDrosophila. II. Pupation site preference.Southwest Nat. 27:315–320.
Fogleman, J. C., and Wallace, B. (1980). Temperature-dependent development and competitive ability of three species in theDrosophila affinis subgroup.Am. Midl. Nat. 104:341–351.
Grossfield, J. (1971). Geographic distribution and light-dependent behavior inDrosophila.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 68:2669–2673.
Grossfield, J. (1978). Non-sexual behavior ofDrosophila. In Ashburner, M., and Wright, T. R. F. (eds.),The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 2B, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–126.
Heed, W. B. (1978). Ecology and genetics of Sonoran desertDrosophila. In Brussard, P. F. (ed.),Ecological Genetics: The Interface, Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 109–126.
Manning, M., and Markow, T. A. (1981). Light-dependent pupation site preference inDrosophila. II.D. melanogaster andD. simulans.Behav. Genet. 11:557–563.
Markow, T. A. (1979). A survey of intra- and interspecific variation for pupation height inDrosophila.Behav. Genet. 9:209–217.
Markow, T. A., and Fogleman, J. C. (1981). Behavioral differentiation between two species of cactiphilicDrosophila. I. Adult geotaxis and phototaxis.Experientia 37:145–146.
Parsons, P. A., and Stanley, S. M. (1981). Domesticated and widespread species. In Ashburner, M., Carson, H. L., and Thompson, J. N. (eds.),The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3A, Academic Press, London, pp. 349–393.
Ringo, J., and Wood, D. (1983). Pupation site selection inDrosophila simulans.Behav. Genet. 13:17–27.
Rizki, M. T. M., and Davis, C. G., Jr. (1953). Light as an ecological determinant of interspecific competition betweenD. willistoni andD. melanogaster.Am. Nat. 87:389–392.
Rockwell, R. F., and Seiger, M. B. (1973). A comparative study of photo-response inD. pseudoobscura andD. persimilis, Behav. Genet. 3:163–174.
Schnebel, E. M., and Grossfield, J. (1984). Mating-temperature ranges inDrosophila.Evolution 38:1296–1307.
Siegel, S. (1956).Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1981).Biometry, 2nd ed., W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Sokolowski, M. B., and Hansell, R. I. C. (1983). Elucidating the behavioral phenotype ofDrosophila melanogaster larvae: Correlations between larval foraging strategies and pupation height.Behav. Genet. 13:267–280.
Spieth, H. T., (1979). The virilis group ofDrosophila and the beaverCastor.Am. Nat. 114:312–316.
Stanley, S. M., Parsons, P. A., Spence, G. E., and Weber, L. (1980). Resistance of species of theDrosophila melanogaster subgroup to environmental extremes.Aust. J. Zool. 28:413–421.
Starmer, W. T. (1981). A comparison ofDrosophila habitats accordings to the physiological attributes of the associated yeast communities.Evolution 35:38–52.
Starmer, W. T., Heed, W. B. and Rockwood-Sluss, E. S. (1977). Extension of longevity inD. mojavensis by environmental ethanol: Differences between subraces.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:387–391.
Wong, J. L., Sokolowski, M. B., and Kent, C. F. (1985). Prepupation behavior inDrosophila: Embedding.Behav. Genet. 15:155–164.
Zar, J. H. (1974).Biostatistical Analysis, Prentice Hall: Engelewood Cliffs, N.J.
Zouros, E. (1973). Genic differentiation associated with the early stages of speciation in themulleri subgroup ofDrosophila.Evolution 27:601–621.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported in part by USPHS Grant 2 S07 RR07132 and by awards from CUNY-FRAP.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schnebel, E.M., Grossfield, J. The influence of light on pupation height inDrosophila . Behav Genet 16, 407–413 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01071320
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01071320