Abstract
The evolution of endosperm, the tissue that nourishes developing embryos, has remained an enigma owing to its unique genetic composition. Because it contains both maternal (generally 2 doses) and paternal (1 dose) genomes, it is suggested to have evolved as a compromising tissue between the evolutionary interests of the maternal parent and offspring over resource allocation. This argument implies that in species where endosperm is highly functional and persistent, it quenches competition among developing embryos for resources and facilitates an equitable resource allocation to the developing offspring. Based on this argument we predict the association of well developed endosperm with certain features of fruits such as high ovule number per ovary and low extent of seed abortion. In this paper, we provide evidence in support of these predictions by analysing the data from 1131 species from the Flora of Presidency of Madras. We show that persistent and functional endosperm is more frequent in multiovulated than in uniovulated species and in species with less seed abortion. Our results also suggest that species with well developed endosperm tend to have uni-carpelled ovaries. Our analyses show that these associations are less likely to be emerging due to phylogenetic constraints. We argue that the endosperm has evolved as a maternal strategy of quenching the extent of sibling rivalry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bawa, K. S., Hegde, S. G., Ganeshaiah, K. N., Uma Shaanker, R., 1989: Embryo and seed abortion in plants. — Nature342: 625–626.
Bhojwani, S. S., Bhatnagar, S. P., 1975: The embryology of angiosperms. — New Delhi: Vikas.
Bulmer, M. G., 1985: Genetic models of endosperm evolution in higher plants. — InKarlin, S., Novo, E., (Eds): Proc. Int. Workshop Conf. Evolutionary Processes and Theory. — New York: Academic Press.
Casper, B., 1990: Seedling establishment from one and two-seeded fruits ofCryptantha flava: test of parent offspring conflict. — Amer. Naturalist136: 167–178.
Charnov, E. L., 1979: Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA76: 2480–2484.
Felsenstein, J., 1985: Phylogenies and comparative method. — Amer. Naturalist125: 1–15.
—, 1988: Phylogenies and quantitative characters. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.19: 445–471.
Gamble, J. S., 1915–1934: Flora of the Presidency of Madras,1–3. — London: Adlard.
Ganeshaiah, K. N., Uma Shaanker, R., 1988: Seed abortion in wind-dispersed pods ofDalbergia sissoo: maternal regulation or sibling rivalry? — Oecologia77: 135–139.
Gunn, C. R., 1984: Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamilyMimosoideae (Fabaceae). — U.S.D.A. Techn. Bull.1681.
Haig, D., Westoby, M., 1989: Parent-specific gene experssion and the triploid endosperm. — Amer. Naturalist134: 147–155.
Harvey, P. H., Pagel, M. D., 1991: The comparative method in evolutionary biology. — Oxford: Oxford University Press.
—, 1991: Comparative methods for explaining adaptations. — Nature351: 619–629.
Ludwig, J. A., Reynolds, J. F., 1988: — Statistical ecology. — New York: Wiley.
Lynet, M. C., 1991: Methods for the analysis of comparative data in evolutionary biology. — Evolution45: 1065–1080.
Maheshwari, P., 1950: An introduction to the embryology of angiosperms. — New York: McGraw Hill.
Manning, S. A., 1965: Systematic guide to flowering plants of the world. — London: Museum Press.
Masand, P., Kapil, R. N., 1966: Nutrition of the embryo sac and embryo — a morphological approach. — Phytomorphology16: 158–175.
McLean, R. C., Ivimey-Cook, W. R., 1956: Textbook of theoretical botany.II. — London: Longman.
Meeuse, A. D. J., 1986: Again: double fertilization and the mono versus polyphyletic evolution of angiosperms. — Phytomorphology36: 17–21.
Queller, D. C., 1983: Kin selection and conflict in seed maturation. — J. Theor. Biol.100: 153–172.
Sokal, R. R., Rohlf, F. J., 1969: Biometry. — San Francisco: Freeman.
Uma Shaanker, R., Ganeshaiah, K. N., Bawa, K. S., 1988: Parent-offspring conflict, sibling rivalry and brood size patterns in plants. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.19: 177–205.
Vijayaraghavan, M. R., Prabhakar, K., 1984: The endosperm. — InJohri, B. M., (Ed.): The embryology of angiosperms, pp. 319–376. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Westoby, M., Rice, B., 1982: Evolution of the seed plants and inclusive fitness of plant tissues. — Evolution36: 713–724.
Willson, M. F., 1983: Plant reproductive ecology. — New York: Wiley.
—, 1983: Mate choice in plants: tactics, mechanisms and consequences. — Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Uma Shaanker, R., Ravishankar, K.V., Hegde, S.G. et al. Does endosperm reduce intra-fruit competition among developing seeds?. Pl Syst Evol 201, 263–270 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989066
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989066