Skip to main content
Log in

Does endosperm reduce intra-fruit competition among developing seeds?

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evolution of endosperm, the tissue that nourishes developing embryos, has remained an enigma owing to its unique genetic composition. Because it contains both maternal (generally 2 doses) and paternal (1 dose) genomes, it is suggested to have evolved as a compromising tissue between the evolutionary interests of the maternal parent and offspring over resource allocation. This argument implies that in species where endosperm is highly functional and persistent, it quenches competition among developing embryos for resources and facilitates an equitable resource allocation to the developing offspring. Based on this argument we predict the association of well developed endosperm with certain features of fruits such as high ovule number per ovary and low extent of seed abortion. In this paper, we provide evidence in support of these predictions by analysing the data from 1131 species from the Flora of Presidency of Madras. We show that persistent and functional endosperm is more frequent in multiovulated than in uniovulated species and in species with less seed abortion. Our results also suggest that species with well developed endosperm tend to have uni-carpelled ovaries. Our analyses show that these associations are less likely to be emerging due to phylogenetic constraints. We argue that the endosperm has evolved as a maternal strategy of quenching the extent of sibling rivalry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bawa, K. S., Hegde, S. G., Ganeshaiah, K. N., Uma Shaanker, R., 1989: Embryo and seed abortion in plants. — Nature342: 625–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhojwani, S. S., Bhatnagar, S. P., 1975: The embryology of angiosperms. — New Delhi: Vikas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. G., 1985: Genetic models of endosperm evolution in higher plants. — InKarlin, S., Novo, E., (Eds): Proc. Int. Workshop Conf. Evolutionary Processes and Theory. — New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper, B., 1990: Seedling establishment from one and two-seeded fruits ofCryptantha flava: test of parent offspring conflict. — Amer. Naturalist136: 167–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E. L., 1979: Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA76: 2480–2484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 1985: Phylogenies and comparative method. — Amer. Naturalist125: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988: Phylogenies and quantitative characters. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.19: 445–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, J. S., 1915–1934: Flora of the Presidency of Madras,1–3. — London: Adlard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganeshaiah, K. N., Uma Shaanker, R., 1988: Seed abortion in wind-dispersed pods ofDalbergia sissoo: maternal regulation or sibling rivalry? — Oecologia77: 135–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, C. R., 1984: Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamilyMimosoideae (Fabaceae). — U.S.D.A. Techn. Bull.1681.

  • Haig, D., Westoby, M., 1989: Parent-specific gene experssion and the triploid endosperm. — Amer. Naturalist134: 147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P. H., Pagel, M. D., 1991: The comparative method in evolutionary biology. — Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1991: Comparative methods for explaining adaptations. — Nature351: 619–629.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, J. A., Reynolds, J. F., 1988: — Statistical ecology. — New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynet, M. C., 1991: Methods for the analysis of comparative data in evolutionary biology. — Evolution45: 1065–1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheshwari, P., 1950: An introduction to the embryology of angiosperms. — New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, S. A., 1965: Systematic guide to flowering plants of the world. — London: Museum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masand, P., Kapil, R. N., 1966: Nutrition of the embryo sac and embryo — a morphological approach. — Phytomorphology16: 158–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, R. C., Ivimey-Cook, W. R., 1956: Textbook of theoretical botany.II. — London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeuse, A. D. J., 1986: Again: double fertilization and the mono versus polyphyletic evolution of angiosperms. — Phytomorphology36: 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller, D. C., 1983: Kin selection and conflict in seed maturation. — J. Theor. Biol.100: 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., Rohlf, F. J., 1969: Biometry. — San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uma Shaanker, R., Ganeshaiah, K. N., Bawa, K. S., 1988: Parent-offspring conflict, sibling rivalry and brood size patterns in plants. — Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.19: 177–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijayaraghavan, M. R., Prabhakar, K., 1984: The endosperm. — InJohri, B. M., (Ed.): The embryology of angiosperms, pp. 319–376. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoby, M., Rice, B., 1982: Evolution of the seed plants and inclusive fitness of plant tissues. — Evolution36: 713–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson, M. F., 1983: Plant reproductive ecology. — New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1983: Mate choice in plants: tactics, mechanisms and consequences. — Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uma Shaanker, R., Ravishankar, K.V., Hegde, S.G. et al. Does endosperm reduce intra-fruit competition among developing seeds?. Pl Syst Evol 201, 263–270 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989066

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989066

Key words

Navigation