Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular phylogeny ofSalicaceae and closely relatedFlacourtiaceae: Evidence from 5.8 S, ITS 1 and ITS 2 of the rDNA

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A ribosomal DNA region, including the entire 5.8S RNA gene and the internal transcribed spacers ITS 1 and ITS 2, was used for studying the phylogeny ofSalicaceae and the relationship betweenSalicaceae andFlacourtiaceae. The length of the ITS regions withinSalicaceae andFlacourtiaceae was similar to that found in other angiosperms. The GC content of both ITS regions was high, varying 62.7-72.2%. The most parsimonious tree clusters the wind-pollinatedChosenia bracteosa among theSalix species, suggesting that it should be included in the genusSalix. The grouping withinSalix leaves subg.Salix as paraphyletic, for which reason the subgeneric division is questionable.Populus was monophyletic and formed a sister group toSalix. The interspecific variation of the ITS sequences was very small inSalicaceae, which is in contradiction to the age of the group according to the evidence from fossil data.Idesia polycarpa fromFlacourtiaceae shows great sequence similarity withSalicaceae, but the analysis of 5.8S rDNA supports monophyly of the four species ofFlacourtiaceae sampled for this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argus, G. W., 1974: An experimental study of hybridization and pollination inSalix (willow). — Canad. J. Bot.52: 1613–1619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, B. G., Sanderson, M. J., Porter, J. M., Wojciechowski, M. F., Cambell, C. S., Donoghue, M. J., 1995: The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.82: 247–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, G., Olofsson, B., Filipski, J., Zerial, M., Salinas, J., Cuny, G., Meunier-Rotival, M., Rodier, F., 1985: The mosaic genome of warm-blooded vertebrates. — Science228: 953–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1988: Compositional patterns in vertebrate genomes: conservation and change in evolution. — J. Molec. Evol.28: 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boes, T. K., Strauss, S. H., 1994: Floral phenology and morphology of black cottonwood,Populus trichocarpa (Salicaceae). — Amer. J. Bot.81: 562–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, K., Bremer, B., Thulin, M., 1997: Classification of flowering plants. — Http://www.systbot.uu.se/classification/overview.html.

  • Brummitt, R. K., 1992: Vascular plant families and genera. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsfeld, S. J., Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., 1992: Evolutionary patterns and processes inSalix sect.Longifoliae: evidence from chloroplast DNA. — Syst. Bot.17: 239–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchler, W., 1986: Neue Chromosomenzählungen in der GattungSalix. 2. Teil. — Bot. Helv.96: 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, J. L., Pannetier, C., Jaulin, C., Kourilsky, P., 1990: Optimal conditions for directly sequencing double-stranded PCR products with sequenase. — Nucl. Acids Res.18: 4028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, M. W., Lledó, M. D., Crespo, M. B., Swensen, S. M., 1996: “When in doubt, put it in theFlacourtiaceae”: molecular systematics ofFlacourtiaceae — Amer. J. Bot.83, Suppl., Abstracts: 146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong, D. K. X., Zsuffa, L., Aravanopoulos, F. A., 1995: Genetic relationship betweenSalix exigua and other North American willows (Salix L.): evidence from allozyme variation. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.23: 767–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, M. E., 1992: The early fossil history ofSalicaceae: a brief review. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh98B: 155–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A., 1988: The evolution and classification of flowering plants. — Bronx, New York: New York Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, M. J., Baldwin, B. G., 1993: Phylogenetic analysis ofViburnum based on ribosomal DNA sequences from the internal transcribed spacer regions. — Amer. J. Bot.80: 145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorn, R. D., 1976: A synopsis of AmericanSalix. — Canad. J. Bot.54: 2769–2789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faivre-Rampant, P., 1992: Reconnaissance d'especes, de clones et d'hybrides de peupliers grace au polymorpisme des genes nuclearies codant pour les ARN ribosomiques: Hypotheses sur I'evolution due genrePopulus. — Ph. D. Thesis, University Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand II.

  • Fox, J., 1992: Pollen limitation of reproductive effort in willows. — Oecologia90: 283–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, S., Li, W.-H., 1994: A model for the correlation of mutation rate with GC content and the origin of GC-rich isochores. — J. Molec. Evol.40: 464–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, A., 1955: Chromosome numbers and meiosis in certain Salices. — Hereditas41: 454–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallier, H., 1910: UeberJuliania, eine Terebinthaceen-Gattung mit Cupula, und die wahren Stammeltern der Kätzchenblütler. — Beih, Bot. Centralbl., II,23: 81–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1912: L'origine et le système phylétique des Angiospermes exposés à l'aide de leur arbregénéalogique. — Archiv. Néerl. Sci. Exact. Natur., Sér. III, B (Sci. Nat.)1: 146–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, W. B., Cox, A. V., Llewellyn, P. G., Pickton, C. A. G., Smith, A. G., Walters, R., 1982: A geologic time scale. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, L. J., Wolfe, J. A., 1975: The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: vegetative morphology. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.62: 538–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, D. G., Bleasby, A. J., Fuchs, R., 1992: Clustal V: improved software for multiple sequence alignment. — Computer Applic. Biosci.8: 189–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillis, D. M., Larson, A., Davis, S. K., Zimmer, E. A., 1990: Nucleic acids III: sequencing. — InHillis, D. M., Moritz, C., (Eds): Molecular systematics, pp. 318–370. — Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, T., Zou-Li, M., 1987: Floral morphology ofPopulus lasiocarpa Oliv. and its phylogenetic position inPopulus. — Acta. Bot. Sinica.29: 236–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley, B., Huntley, J. P., 1992: Willows in prehistory. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh98B: 149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, R. B., 1995: Reproductive structure and organogenesis in a cottonwood,Populus deltoides (Salicaceae). — Int. J. Pl. Sci.156: 172–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K.-J., Jansen, R. K., 1994: Comparisons of phylogenetic hypotheses among different data sets in dwarf dandelions (Krigia, Asteraceae): additional information from internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. — Pl. Syst. Evol.190: 157–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M., 1980: A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. — J. Molec. Evol.16: 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarov, V. L., 1936: Flora of the U.S.S.R.,5. — Moscow, Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. [translated from Russian byLandau, N., 1970. — Jerusalem: Israel Program of Scientific Translations].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., Tamura, K., Nei, M., 1993: MEGA: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis, version 1.01. — University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larssson, G., Bremer, B., 1991: Korgviden-nyttoväxter förr och nu [TheSalix viminalis group — useful plants then and now.] — Svensk Bot. Tidskr.85: 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve, A., Löve, D., 1961: Chromosome numbers of Central and Northwest European plant species. — Opera Bot.5: 1–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeuse, A. D. J., 1975: Taxonomic relationship ofSalicaceae andFlacourtiaceae: their bearing on interpretative floral morphology and Dilleniid phylogeny. — Acta Bot. Neerl.24: 437–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meikle, R. D., 1984: Willows and polars of Great Britain and Ireland. — London: Botanical Society of the British Isles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R., 1975: Systematic anatomy of the xylem and comments on the relationships ofFlacourtiaceae. — J. Arnold Arbor.56: 20–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosseler, A., 1990: Hybrid performance and species crossability relationships in willows (Salix). — Canad. J. Bot.68: 2329–2338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakai, T., 1920:Chosenia, a new genus ofSalicaceae. — Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)34: 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickrent, D. L., Schuette, K. P., Starr, E. M., 1994: A molecular phylogeny ofAreuthobium (Viscaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. — Amer. J. Bot.81: 1149–1160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechinger, K. H., 1992:Salix taxonomy in Europe — problems, interpretations, observations. — Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh98B: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S. O., Bendich, A. J., 1987: Ribosomal RNA genes in plants: variability in copy number and in the intergenic spacer. — Pl. Molec. Biol.9: 509–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skvortsov, A. K., 1968: Willows of the USSR. A taxonomic and geographic survey. — Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian with English abstract.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Takaiwa, F., Oono, K., Sugiura, M., 1985: Nucleotide sequence of the 17S-25S spacer region from rice rDNA. — Pl. Molec. Biol.4: 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A. L., 1969: Flowering plants — origin and dispersal. — Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R. F., 1992: Classification and geography of the flowering plants. — Bot. Rev.58: 225–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkateswarlu, K., Nazar, R., 1991: A conserved core structure in the 18-25S rRNA intergenic region from tobacco,Nicotiana rustica. — Pl. Molec. Biol.17: 189–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, J., Zimmer, E. A., 1996: Phylogeny and biogeography ofPanax (the gingseng genus,Araliaceae): inferences from ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. — Molec. Phylogenet. Evol.6: 167–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T. J., Burns, T. D., Lee, S. B., Taylor, J. W., 1990: Analysis of phylogenetic relationships by amplification and direct sequencing of ribosomal genes. — InInnis, M. A., Geleand, D. H., Sninsky, J. J., White, T. J., (Eds): PCR protocols, pp. 315–322. — New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J., 1944: The cytology in relation to its taxonomy. — Ann. Bot.8: 269–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. A., 1988: An overview on the origins of the modern vegetation and flora of the northern Rocky Mountains. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.55: 205–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yurtsev, B. A., Zhukova, P. G., 1982: Chromosome number of some plants of the northeastern Yakutia (the drainage of the Indigirka River in the middle reaches). — Bot. Zhurn.67: 778–787.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leskinen, E., Alström-Rapaport, C. Molecular phylogeny ofSalicaceae and closely relatedFlacourtiaceae: Evidence from 5.8 S, ITS 1 and ITS 2 of the rDNA. Pl Syst Evol 215, 209–227 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984656

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984656

Key words

Navigation