Skip to main content
Log in

Concept of virus species

  • Papers
  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The species concept is applicable in virology because viruses have genomes, replicate, evolve, and occupy particular ecological niches. The following definition of virus species was accepted in 1991 by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses: ‘A virus species is a polythetic class of viruses that constitutes a replicating lineage and occupies a particular ecological niche’. This definition does not provide a list of diagnostic properties for recognizing members of particular virus species. Furthermore, since a virus species is a polythetic class, it is impossible to use a single property such as a certain level of genome homology as defining property of the species. The implications of this new definition of virus species for future virus classification are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beckner, M. (1959)The Biological Way of Thought. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D.H.L. (1985) The genetic basis for describing viruses as species.Intervirol. 24, 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francki, R.I.B., Fauquet, C.M., Knudsen, D.L. and Brown, F. (1991) Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses. Fifth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses.Arch. Virol. Suppl. 2, 1–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M.T. (1984) Definition, character and other equivocal terms. Systematic Zoology33, 104–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, B.D. (1985) Usefulness and limitations of the species concept for plant viruses.Intervirol. 24, 71–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsbury, D.W. (1985) Species classification problems in virus taxonomy.Intervirol. 24, 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. (1984) Species.Philos Sci 51, 308–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R.E.F. (1983)A Critical Appraisal of Viral Taxonomy. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1970)Populations, Species and Evolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1988)Towards a New Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, R.G. (1985) Alternatives to the species concept for virus taxonomy.Intervirol. 24, 94–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, B.D. and Donoghue, M.J. (1982) Species concepts: a case for pluralismSyst Zool 31, 491–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, C.R. (1991) The 20th meeting of the executive committe of ICTV. Virus species, higher taxa, a universal database and other matters.Arch Virol 119, 303–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A. (1985)The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, R. (1986)Biophilosophy. Analytic and Holistic Perspectives. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Regenmortel, M.H.V. (1989)Applying the species concept to plant viruses.Arch Virol 104, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Regenmortel, M.H.V. (1990) Virus species, a much overlooked but essential concept in virus classification.Intervirol. 31, 241–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Regenmortel, M.H.V., Maniloff, J. and Calisher, C. (1991) The concept of virus species.Arch Virol 120, 313–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Regenmortel, M.H.V. Concept of virus species. Biodivers Conserv 1, 263–266 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00693764

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00693764

Keywords

Navigation