References
Barwise, J.: 1979, ‘On Branching Quantifiers in English’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 47–80.
Barwise, J. and R. Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’,Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.
van Benthem, J.: 1986,Essays in Logical Semantics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
van Benthem, J.: 1989, ‘Polyadic Quantifiers’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 437–464.
Boolos, G.: 1984, ‘To Be Is to Be a Value of a Variable (or to Be Some Values of Some Variables)’,Journal of Philosophy 81, 430–449.
Dummett, M.: 1973,Frege: Philosophy of Language, Harper & Row, New York.
Enderton, H. B.: 1970, ‘Finite Partially-Ordered Quantifiers’,Z. f. math. Logik and Grundlagen d. Math. 16, 393–397.
Enderton, H. B.: 1972,A Mathematical Introduction to Logic, Academic Press, New York.
Fauconnier, G.: 1975, ‘Do Quantifiers Branch?”,Linguistic Inquiry 6, 555–567.
Frege, G.: 1884, The Foundations of Arithmetic, tr. by J. L. Austin, 2nd revised ed., Northwestern University Press, Evanston, 1968.
Henkin, L.: 1959, ‘Some Remarks on Infinitely Long Formulas’,Infinitistic Methods, Proceedings of the Symposium on Foundations of Mathematics, Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe and Pergamon Press, Warsaw, 1961, pp. 167–183.
Higginbotham, J. and R. May: 1981, ‘Questions, Quantifiers and Crossing’,The Linguistic Review 1, 41–79.
Hintikka, J.: 1973, ‘Quantifiers vs. Quantification Theory’,Dialectica 27, 329–358; Linguistic Inquiry5, 1974, 153-177.
Hintikka, J.: 1976, ‘Partially Ordered Quantifiers vs. Partially Ordered Ideas’,Dialectica 30, 89–99.
Lindenbaum, A. and A. Tarski: 1935, ‘On the Limitations of the Means of Expression of Deductive Theories’, in A. Tarski, Logic,Semantics, Metamathematics, 2nd ed., Hackett, 1983.
Lindstrom, P.: 1966, ‘First Order Predicate Logic with Generalized Quantifiers’,Theoria 32, 186–195.
May, R.: 1985, Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.
May, R.: 1989, ‘Interpreting Logical Form’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 387–435.
Mostowski, A.: 1957, ‘On a Generalization of Quantifiers’,Fundamenta Mathematicae 44, 12–36.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1970, Philosophy of Logic, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Sher, G.: 1989, ‘A Conception of Tarskian Logic’,Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 70, 341–368.
Sher, G.: 1989, ‘Generalized Logic: A Philosophical Perspective with Linguistic Applications’, Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University.
Stenius, E.: 1976, ‘Comments on Jaakko Hintikka's paper “Quantifiers vs. Quantification Theory”’,Dialectica 30, 67–88.
Tarski, A.: 1956,Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, 2nd. ed., 1983, edited and introduced by J. Corcoran, Hackett.
Tarski, A.: 1966, ‘What are Logical Notions?’, edited and introduced by J. Corcoran,History and Philosophy of Logic 7, 1986, 143–154.
Walkoe, W. J., Jr.: 1970, ‘Finite Partially-Ordered Quantification’,Journal of Symbolic Logic 35, 535–555.
Westerstahl, D.: 1987, ‘Branching Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’, inGeneralized Quantifiers: Linguistic and Logical Approaches, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is essentially part of my 1989 Columbia University dissertation, ‘Generalized Logic: A Philosophical Perspective with Linguistic Applications’. I wish to thank my dissertation Peter Sher, Johan van Benthem and two anonymous referees ofLinguistics and Philosophy for their helpful contributions. I would also like to thank the audiences at The Linguistic Institute (Summer 1986) and M.I.T. (Spring 1988) where I presented earlier versions of the paper. The current version was in part prepared while I was a Visiting Scholar at M.I.T. I am thankful to the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy for its hospitality.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sher, G. Ways of branching quantifers. Linguist Philos 13, 393–422 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00630749
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00630749