Skip to main content
Log in

Ways of branching quantifers

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barwise, J.: 1979, ‘On Branching Quantifiers in English’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 47–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and R. Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’,Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, J.: 1986,Essays in Logical Semantics, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, J.: 1989, ‘Polyadic Quantifiers’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 437–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boolos, G.: 1984, ‘To Be Is to Be a Value of a Variable (or to Be Some Values of Some Variables)’,Journal of Philosophy 81, 430–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1973,Frege: Philosophy of Language, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enderton, H. B.: 1970, ‘Finite Partially-Ordered Quantifiers’,Z. f. math. Logik and Grundlagen d. Math. 16, 393–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enderton, H. B.: 1972,A Mathematical Introduction to Logic, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G.: 1975, ‘Do Quantifiers Branch?”,Linguistic Inquiry 6, 555–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1884, The Foundations of Arithmetic, tr. by J. L. Austin, 2nd revised ed., Northwestern University Press, Evanston, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, L.: 1959, ‘Some Remarks on Infinitely Long Formulas’,Infinitistic Methods, Proceedings of the Symposium on Foundations of Mathematics, Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe and Pergamon Press, Warsaw, 1961, pp. 167–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J. and R. May: 1981, ‘Questions, Quantifiers and Crossing’,The Linguistic Review 1, 41–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1973, ‘Quantifiers vs. Quantification Theory’,Dialectica 27, 329–358; Linguistic Inquiry5, 1974, 153-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1976, ‘Partially Ordered Quantifiers vs. Partially Ordered Ideas’,Dialectica 30, 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenbaum, A. and A. Tarski: 1935, ‘On the Limitations of the Means of Expression of Deductive Theories’, in A. Tarski, Logic,Semantics, Metamathematics, 2nd ed., Hackett, 1983.

  • Lindstrom, P.: 1966, ‘First Order Predicate Logic with Generalized Quantifiers’,Theoria 32, 186–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.: 1985, Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.: 1989, ‘Interpreting Logical Form’,Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 387–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostowski, A.: 1957, ‘On a Generalization of Quantifiers’,Fundamenta Mathematicae 44, 12–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1970, Philosophy of Logic, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher, G.: 1989, ‘A Conception of Tarskian Logic’,Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 70, 341–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sher, G.: 1989, ‘Generalized Logic: A Philosophical Perspective with Linguistic Applications’, Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University.

  • Stenius, E.: 1976, ‘Comments on Jaakko Hintikka's paper “Quantifiers vs. Quantification Theory”’,Dialectica 30, 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A.: 1956,Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, 2nd. ed., 1983, edited and introduced by J. Corcoran, Hackett.

  • Tarski, A.: 1966, ‘What are Logical Notions?’, edited and introduced by J. Corcoran,History and Philosophy of Logic 7, 1986, 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkoe, W. J., Jr.: 1970, ‘Finite Partially-Ordered Quantification’,Journal of Symbolic Logic 35, 535–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerstahl, D.: 1987, ‘Branching Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’, inGeneralized Quantifiers: Linguistic and Logical Approaches, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is essentially part of my 1989 Columbia University dissertation, ‘Generalized Logic: A Philosophical Perspective with Linguistic Applications’. I wish to thank my dissertation Peter Sher, Johan van Benthem and two anonymous referees ofLinguistics and Philosophy for their helpful contributions. I would also like to thank the audiences at The Linguistic Institute (Summer 1986) and M.I.T. (Spring 1988) where I presented earlier versions of the paper. The current version was in part prepared while I was a Visiting Scholar at M.I.T. I am thankful to the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy for its hospitality.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sher, G. Ways of branching quantifers. Linguist Philos 13, 393–422 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00630749

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00630749

Keywords

Navigation