Summary
When the wings of the conventional or four-wing Müller-Lyer figures are displaced away from the shaft, the apparent elongation of the wings-out figure decreases and the apparent contraction of the wings-in figure changes to apparent elongation. Worrall and Firth (1974) reported a different pattern of illusion change for two-wing Müller-Lyer figures containing wings at only one end of the shaft. Whereas moving the wings away from the shaft decreased the magnitude of the wings-in illusion, it changed the wings-out illusion from apparent elongation to apparent contraction. The effect of wing displacement upon the Müller-Lyer illusion was measured in three experiments. Illusion magnitude was assessed by obtaining judgments of either the length (Experiment 1) or the apparent midpoint (Experiments 2 and 3) of the shaft of four-wing (Experiment 1), two-wing (Experiments 1–3), and one-wing (Experiments 1 and 2) Müller-Lyer figures. Both measures of the illusion showed that displacement of the wings away from the shaft had similar effects on the four and two-wing Müller-Lyer figures. The results are discussed in the context of assimilation theories of the Müller-Lyer illusion, and a possible reason for the apparent inconsistency between Worrall and Firth's conclusions and the present findings is outlined.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brigell, M., Uhlarik, J., & Goldhorn, P. (1977). Contextual influences on judgments of linear extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 105–118
Day, R. H., & Dickinson, R. G. (1976). Apparent length of the arms of acute and obtuse angles, and the components of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Australian Journal of Psychology, 28, 137–148.
Greist-Bousquet, S., & Schiffman, H. R. (1981). The role of structural components in the Müller-Lyer illusion, Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 505–511.
Fellows, B. J. (1967). Reversal of the Müller-Lyer illusion with changes in the length of the inter-fins line. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 208–214.
Oyama, T. (1960). Japanese studies on the so-called geometrical optical illusions. Psychologia, 3, 7–20.
Predebon, J. (1992). Framing effects and the reversed Müller-Lyer illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 307–314.
Pressey, A. W. (1967). A theory of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 25, 569–572.
Pressey, A. W., & Bross, M. (1973). Assimilation theory and the reversed Müller-Lyer illusion, Perception, 2, 211–217.
Pressey, A. W., Di Lollo, V., & Tait, R. W. (1977). Effects of gap size between the shaft and fins of angle of fins on the Müller-Lyer illusion. Perception, 6, 435–439.
Pressey, A. W., & Pressey, C. A. (1992). Attentive fields are related to focal and contextual features: A study of Müller-Lyer distortions. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 423–436.
Sekuler, R., & Erlebacher, A. (1971). The two illusions of Müller-Lyer: Confusion theory reexamined. American Journal of Psychology, 84, 477–486.
Warren, R. M., & Bashford, J. A. (1977). Müller-Lyer illusions: Their origin in processes facilitating object recognition. Perception, 6, 615–626.
Worrall, N., & Firth, D. (1974). The components of the standard and reverse Müller-Lyer illusions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 342–354.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Predebon, J. The reversed Müller-Lyer illusion in conventional and in wing-amputated Müller-Lyer figures. Psychol. Res 56, 217–223 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419652
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00419652