Summary
In the bimodal detection task the observer must respond as soon as a signal is presented in either of two modalities (e.g., a tone or a flash). A typical finding is a facilitation of reaction time for redundant signal trials, that is, when both signals are presented simultaneously or with a short delay. Models advanced for this effect imply either statistical facilitation (separate activation) or intersensory facilitation (coactivation). This paper reports a study investigating whether part of the facilitation can be accounted for by coactivation in the motor component. An analysis of the distributions of reaction time differences between left and right hand responses from a double response paradigm gave some evidence in favor of this hypothesis. In particular, our data suggest a u-shaped functional dependence of the amount of facilitation in the motor component on the interstimulus interval.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annett, M., & Annett, J. (1979). Individual differences in right and left reaction times. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 393–404.
Ashby, F. G. (1982). Deriving exact predictions from the cascade model. Psychological Review, 89, 599–607.
Burbeck, S. L., & Luce, R. D. (1982). Evidence from auditory simple reaction times for both change and level detectors. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 117–133.
Colonius, H. (1986). Measuring channel dependence in separate activation models. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 251–255.
Gielen, S. C. A. M., Schmidt, R. A., & van den Heuvel, P. J. M. (1983). On the nature of intersensory facilitation of reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 161–168.
Kiefer, J. (1959). K-sample analogues of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramer-v. Mises test. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 30, 420–447.
Kohfeld, D. L., Santee, J. L., & Wallace, N. D. (1981). Loudness and reaction times: II. Identification of detection components at different intensities and frequencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 550–562.
Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times. Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287–330.
Meyer, D. E., Yantis, S., Osman, A., & Smith, J. E. K. (1984). Discrete versus continuous models of response: A reaction time analysis. In S. Kornblum, & J. Requin (Eds.), Preparatory States and Processes: Proceedings of the Franco-American Conference, Ann Arbor, MI, August, 1982. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247–279.
Nickerson, R. S. (1973). Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: Energy summation or preparation enhancement? Psychological Review, 80, 489–509.
Raab, D. H. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 24, 574–590.
Schmidt, R. A., Gielen, S. C. A. M., & van den Heuvel. P. J. M. (1984). The locus of intersensory facilitation of reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 57, 145–164.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention & Performance II. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.
Todd, J. W. (1912). Reaction to multiple stimuli. Archives of Psychology, 25, 1–65.
Ulrich, R., & Stapf, K. H. (1984). A double response paradigm to study stimulus intensity effects upon the motor system in simple reaction time experiments. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 545–558.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Diederich, A., Colonius, H. Intersensory facilitation in the motor component?. Psychol. Res 49, 23–29 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309199
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309199