Skip to main content
Log in

Plucking or cutting Gelidium sesquipedale? A demographic simulation of harvest impact using a population projection matrix model.

  • 4. Resources
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A matrix model describes the annual dynamics of a commercial (harvested by plucking) Gelidium sesquipedale population off Cape Espichel, Portugal. Vital rates were measured from a frond population divided into size classes; annual transition probabilities among them were calculated. Transition probabilities under harvest by cutting are derived by assuming that all harvested fronds are cut to the first size class, and none are plucked. Simulations of the annual population dynamics for harvest by both plucking and cutting are used to assess which harvest strategy will optimize yields. Assuming the same efficiency for both strategies, cutting fronds to 7 cm (as mechanical harvesters do) results in a higher population growth rate (λ = 1.08 to 1.35) than occurs with the plucking technique (λ = 0.85). Simulations of population recovery show the number of fronds in each size class available the next harvest season will be higher when cut than plucked. This model can also optimize yields by predicting the more efficient season opening, and harvesting cutting height.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åberg, P., 1992. A demographic study of two populations of the seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum: Ecology 73: 1473–1487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, P. O. & R. E. De Wreede. 1990. Matrix models for algal life history stages. Marine Ecology Progress Series 59: 171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borja, A., 1987. Cartografia, evaluación de la biomassa y arribazones del alga Gelidium sesquipedale (Clem.) Born et Thur en la costa guipuzcoana (N España). Inv. Pesq. 51: 199–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H., 1989. Matrix Population Models: construction, analysis and interpretation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 328 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Craene, R. J. A., 1971. Les algues en général et leur exploration au Maroc. Revue de l'Agriculture 6/7: 815–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P., 1958. The structure and development of the thallus in the British species of Gelidium and Pterocladia. Ann. Bot. 22: 353–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, K. C., 1961. Morphological studies of the Gelidiales. Univ. Cal. Publ. Bot. 32: 315–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorostiaga, J. M., 1990. Aspectos demograficos del alga roja Gelidium sesquipedale (Clemente) Thuret. Discusión sobre su adequada gestión como recurso explotable. Ph. D. Dissertation, Universidad del Pais Vasco, Bilbao, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J. L. (1977). Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, London, 892 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juanes, J. A. & A. Borja, 1991. Biological criteria for the exploitation of the commercially important species of Gelidium in Spain. In J. A. Juanes, B. Santelices & J. L. McLachlan (eds), International Workshop on Gelidium. Developments in Hydrobiology 68. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 45–54. Reprinted from Hydrobiologia 221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juanes, J. A., B. Santelices & J. L. McLachlan, 1991. International Workshop on Gelidium. Developments in Hydrobiology 68. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 203 pp. Reprinted from Hydrobiologia 221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moloney, K. A., 1986. A generalized algorithm for determining category size. Oecologia 69: 176–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palminha, F., 1971. Exploração e utilização de Algas Marinhas na Plataforma Portuguesa e nas Ilhas do Arquipélago dos Açores. Junta Nacional de Fomento das Pescas 7: 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salinas, J. M., B. Reguera & R. Gancedo, 1976. Biometria en Gelidium sesquipedale (Rhodophyta). Primera Parte. Bol. Inst. esp. Oceanogr. 226: 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santelices, B., 1988. Synopsis of biological data on the seaweed genera Gelidium and Pterocladia (Rhodophyta). FAO Fisheries Synopsis, 145, 55 pp.

  • Santos, R., in press. A multivariate study of biotic and abiotic relationships in a subtidal algal stand. Marine Ecology Progress Series.

  • Santos, R. & P. Duarte, 1991. Marine plant harvest in Portugal.

  • Seoane-Camba, J., 1966. Algunos datos de interés en la recolección de Gelidium sesquipedale. Publ. técn. J. Est. Pesca 5: 437–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, G. J. & D. M. Tremblay 1985. A tagging technique for small macrophytes. Bot. mar. 28: 549–551.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santos, R. Plucking or cutting Gelidium sesquipedale? A demographic simulation of harvest impact using a population projection matrix model.. Hydrobiologia 260, 269–276 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049028

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049028

Key words

Navigation