Abstract
A matrix model describes the annual dynamics of a commercial (harvested by plucking) Gelidium sesquipedale population off Cape Espichel, Portugal. Vital rates were measured from a frond population divided into size classes; annual transition probabilities among them were calculated. Transition probabilities under harvest by cutting are derived by assuming that all harvested fronds are cut to the first size class, and none are plucked. Simulations of the annual population dynamics for harvest by both plucking and cutting are used to assess which harvest strategy will optimize yields. Assuming the same efficiency for both strategies, cutting fronds to 7 cm (as mechanical harvesters do) results in a higher population growth rate (λ = 1.08 to 1.35) than occurs with the plucking technique (λ = 0.85). Simulations of population recovery show the number of fronds in each size class available the next harvest season will be higher when cut than plucked. This model can also optimize yields by predicting the more efficient season opening, and harvesting cutting height.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Åberg, P., 1992. A demographic study of two populations of the seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum: Ecology 73: 1473–1487.
Ang, P. O. & R. E. De Wreede. 1990. Matrix models for algal life history stages. Marine Ecology Progress Series 59: 171–181.
Borja, A., 1987. Cartografia, evaluación de la biomassa y arribazones del alga Gelidium sesquipedale (Clem.) Born et Thur en la costa guipuzcoana (N España). Inv. Pesq. 51: 199–224.
Caswell, H., 1989. Matrix Population Models: construction, analysis and interpretation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 328 pp.
De Craene, R. J. A., 1971. Les algues en général et leur exploration au Maroc. Revue de l'Agriculture 6/7: 815–836.
Dixon, P., 1958. The structure and development of the thallus in the British species of Gelidium and Pterocladia. Ann. Bot. 22: 353–368.
Fan, K. C., 1961. Morphological studies of the Gelidiales. Univ. Cal. Publ. Bot. 32: 315–368.
Gorostiaga, J. M., 1990. Aspectos demograficos del alga roja Gelidium sesquipedale (Clemente) Thuret. Discusión sobre su adequada gestión como recurso explotable. Ph. D. Dissertation, Universidad del Pais Vasco, Bilbao, Spain.
Harper, J. L. (1977). Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, London, 892 pp.
Juanes, J. A. & A. Borja, 1991. Biological criteria for the exploitation of the commercially important species of Gelidium in Spain. In J. A. Juanes, B. Santelices & J. L. McLachlan (eds), International Workshop on Gelidium. Developments in Hydrobiology 68. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 45–54. Reprinted from Hydrobiologia 221.
Juanes, J. A., B. Santelices & J. L. McLachlan, 1991. International Workshop on Gelidium. Developments in Hydrobiology 68. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 203 pp. Reprinted from Hydrobiologia 221.
Moloney, K. A., 1986. A generalized algorithm for determining category size. Oecologia 69: 176–180.
Palminha, F., 1971. Exploração e utilização de Algas Marinhas na Plataforma Portuguesa e nas Ilhas do Arquipélago dos Açores. Junta Nacional de Fomento das Pescas 7: 25–36.
Salinas, J. M., B. Reguera & R. Gancedo, 1976. Biometria en Gelidium sesquipedale (Rhodophyta). Primera Parte. Bol. Inst. esp. Oceanogr. 226: 1–70.
Santelices, B., 1988. Synopsis of biological data on the seaweed genera Gelidium and Pterocladia (Rhodophyta). FAO Fisheries Synopsis, 145, 55 pp.
Santos, R., in press. A multivariate study of biotic and abiotic relationships in a subtidal algal stand. Marine Ecology Progress Series.
Santos, R. & P. Duarte, 1991. Marine plant harvest in Portugal.
Seoane-Camba, J., 1966. Algunos datos de interés en la recolección de Gelidium sesquipedale. Publ. técn. J. Est. Pesca 5: 437–455.
Sharp, G. J. & D. M. Tremblay 1985. A tagging technique for small macrophytes. Bot. mar. 28: 549–551.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santos, R. Plucking or cutting Gelidium sesquipedale? A demographic simulation of harvest impact using a population projection matrix model.. Hydrobiologia 260, 269–276 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049028
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00049028